[MENTORS] September podling reports due

Hi, Sorry for the delay in posting this, please take a couple of days past these dates to submit. Timeline for September Wed September 01 -- Podling reports due by end of day Sun September 05 -- Shepherd reviews due by end of day Sun September 05 -- Summary due by end of day Tue

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Maven - Mvndaemon

I agree in general, and due diligence is specifically warranted for the case you cite here: > often with software grants the license changes to ALv2 just before donation So to narrow the conversation for this specific case: The LICENSE file was added to the repo 2019-09-30 and all files in the r

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Maven - Mvndaemon

Hi, While some of that conversation may apply here, and I don’t think there is any issues, please note the conversation is in a slightly different context to a software grant. When contributing to an ASF project it is clear under what terms you are contributing. When contributing to a 3rd party

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Maven - Mvndaemon

On 9/5/21, 7:46 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: You’ll note [1] says "All contributors of ideas, code, or documentation to any Apache projects must complete, sign, and submit via email an Individual Contributor License Agreement(ICLA).’ however we do allow people to contribute without signing a

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Maven - Mvndaemon

Hi, > Is there any rule written somewhere? Because frankly "significant" > contribution is very subjective…. You’ll note [1] says "All contributors of ideas, code, or documentation to any Apache projects must complete, sign, and submit via email an Individual Contributor License Agreement(ICLA

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Maven - Mvndaemon

On 9/5/21, 7:16 PM, "Olivier Lamy" wrote: Again the project is already Apache license from the start so any contribution will be de facto ASF compliant *** Linked from the blog post I cited earlier justifies this statement. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-infrastructure-dev

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Maven - Mvndaemon

For context, https://github.com/mvndaemon/mvnd/graphs/contributors It looks to me like the not-top-2-contributors accounted for well under one percent of the code, and all of their contributions were under the Apache License 2.0. While not trivial, the other contributions seem to be simple an

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Maven - Mvndaemon

My concern is the habit of some using lines of code as a measure of significance. One can make a "significant" commit of a few lines, and an insignificant commit of thousands of lines. It is better to assess the intellectual property content of the submission. I did look through all contribut

[VOTE] Release Apache InLong(Incubating) 0.10.0-incubating RC1

Hello Incubator Community, This is a call for a vote to release Apache InLong(Incubating) version 0.10.0-incubating RC1 The Apache InLong community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache InLong(Incubating) version 0.10.0-incubating RC1 We now kindly request th

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Maven - Mvndaemon

On Mon, 6 Sept 2021 at 12:13, Daniel Widdis wrote: > Code size is not the only measure of significance. > > Without any specialty knowledge of the domain, I would consider this > security fix probably significant. > https://github.com/mvndaemon/mvnd/pull/391 fixing > https://github.com/mvndaemon/

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Maven - Mvndaemon

On Mon, 6 Sept 2021 at 12:03, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > looking at this https://github.com/mvndaemon/mvnd/graphs/contributors < > https://github.com/mvndaemon/mvnd/graphs/contributors> except the 2 main > contributors we can't really qualify other contributions as really > significant in t

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Maven - Mvndaemon

Code size is not the only measure of significance. Without any specialty knowledge of the domain, I would consider this security fix probably significant. https://github.com/mvndaemon/mvnd/pull/391 fixing https://github.com/mvndaemon/mvnd/issues/390 However, the AL2.0 license states: > Unless

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Maven - Mvndaemon

Hi, > looking at this https://github.com/mvndaemon/mvnd/graphs/contributors > except the 2 main > contributors we can't really qualify other contributions as really > significant in terms of code size :) You might want to look at each co

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Maven - Mvndaemon

I looked into every commit to this repository. https://github.com/mvndaemon/mvnd/graphs/contributors I understand from the thread there are CLAs from the two main contributors. Of the remaining 11 committers: - lanmaoxinqing had one substantive commit of +87/-9 lines. - Syquel had one substantiv

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Maven - Mvndaemon

On Mon, 6 Sept 2021 at 11:08, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > ?? You mean we need CLAs for every person who contributed a Pull Request > to > > an Apache License project? > > No we don’t, but it’s best to have them from everyone who has made a > significant contribution. > looking at this https

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc (Incubating) 1.0.0-rc02

Hi， Lorin the voting time has passed， you can reply to this mail with the closing vote. then you can open a new thread to announce the release. thanks. On 2021/08/31 12:52:40, Lorin Lee wrote: > Hello IPMC, > > > > The Apache brpc community has voted and approved the release of Apache > >

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Maven - Mvndaemon

Hi, > ?? You mean we need CLAs for every person who contributed a Pull Request to > an Apache License project? No we don’t, but it’s best to have them from everyone who has made a significant contribution. > we need to address the native part. Not sure how ATM You probably need to work this ou

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Maven - Mvndaemon

Hi Thanks for looking into this. On Mon, 6 Sept 2021 at 09:15, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > I have a couple of questions: > I see we have ICLAs for the two main contributors, do we have ICLAs for > any for the the other contributors? > ?? You mean we need CLAs for every person who contributed

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Maven - Mvndaemon

Hi, I have a couple of questions: I see we have ICLAs for the two main contributors, do we have ICLAs for any for the the other contributors? The repro includes GPL licensed code how is this going to be handled? (GPL is category X and not compatible with the Apache license). There also seems to

[IP CLEARANCE] Apache Maven - Mvndaemon

Hi The Apache Maven project has voted [1] the donation of the mvndaemon project [2]. Following the IP clearance process [3] this is a lazy consensus majority vote, open for at least 72 hours. Please vote to accept this contribution. Thanks, -- Olivier [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@maven

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Annotator (incubating) 0.2.0 release

On Fri, 3 Sept 2021 at 13:43, Gerben wrote: > > Dear community, > > The Apache Annotator (incubating) community is pleased to announce the > release of Apache Annotator (incubating) 0.2.0. > > Apache Annotator (incubating) provides libraries to enable annotation > related software, with an initial