Hi Paul,
I'm one of the NLPCraft project members, let me chime in here.
1. The project is very interested in native Groovy/Kotlin/Scala model APIs.
It is a bit unclear for now how much work needs to be done specifically for
these languages given that NLPCraft provides a very plain (and
Scala-frien
Paul, I think five is the charm! Groovy has been my favorite language for near
a decade so I would love you to join the group of mentors. And I think I am
expressing the unspoken consensus of the rest of us :) So, welcome!
As for the use of Commons Clause: thanks for the good catch. Let's look int
Looks like you have close to a full house for mentors. I could certainly
put my hat in the ring if you need another, otherwise I will certainly be
an interested community member. It seems like an interesting project. I
would have a particular interest in Groovy/Micronaut integration.
I did notice
Dave,
appreciate the offer - having someone of your caliber on the team is a huge
help. I will update the proposal shortly!
Welcome and thank you!
--
Cos
On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 04:59PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> This is very interesting. You’ve got a good set of mentors!
>
> If you are looking fo
This is very interesting. You’ve got a good set of mentors!
If you are looking for a fourth mentor then I volunteer if you are interested.
Regards,
Dave
> On Feb 3, 2020, at 4:43 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
> Good time of the time to all!
>
> I'd like to bring this new interesting project
Good time of the time to all!
I'd like to bring this new interesting project for the discussion, comments
and feedback with the aim of starting a formal [VOTE] of its acceptance into
Incubator.
People behind this project aren't new to Apache: some of them were behind the
Apache Ignite incubation,
I could use some help from anyone that has experience in downloading Google
Protobuf-3.11.1 for Java and getting it to work in Eclipse as a Maven
project?
Cheers,
Lee.
lee...@apache.org
I do not have answers to those questions, which seems like good ones.
I just wanted to break the loop, which I think I might have ;-)
On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 5:13 PM David Nalley wrote:
>
> My sense from reading this thread is that it was a 'work-for-hire' and
> that the contributors are not owner
My sense from reading this thread is that it was a 'work-for-hire' and
that the contributors are not owners. Otherwise, why have they been
bothering to talk to Walmart Labs? Why is a company (as opposed to
project or indivudal(s)) listed as the copyright holder in source
code?
The copyright heade
I think what Robert is highlighting was that collectively, the
contributors are still owners and have granted permission to use
another license.
On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 4:59 PM David Nalley wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 9:27 PM Justin Mclean wrote:
> >
> > HI,
> >
> > I agree with what John w
On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 9:27 PM Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> HI,
>
> I agree with what John wrote, part of the code is EPL which is not compatible
> with the ALv2, you need the owner permission to change the license on that..
>
> My understanding of "Let me try to get in contact with Walmart Labs to g
HI,
I agree with what John wrote, part of the code is EPL which is not compatible
with the ALv2, you need the owner permission to change the license on that..
My understanding of "Let me try to get in contact with Walmart Labs to get an
SGA for the Takari Maven Wrapper.” was that the next step
Hi Justin,
No, we've got agreements from all significant contributors and I assumed it was
clear that this was all we needed. "The takari CLA only grants Takari and hence
also Walmart equal access to the code. As such the contributors all own
copyright to the code and can assign to Apache."
Ev
Hi,
> Vote succeeded by lazy consensus.
Has Walmart Labs siogned an SGA?
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Vote succeeded by lazy consensus.
I will continue the process.
thanks,
Robert
On 24-1-2020 11:05:15, Robert Scholte wrote:
Although there wasn't an explicit -1, I noticed some concerns.
I would like to complete the process properly so would like to see from John
and Justin if we can continue?
Hi,
> The report has a new question that I am not sure Tuweni looked into: "Is the
> PPMC managing the podling's brand / trademarks?”
> Pretty sure we haven’t done much in that department.
>
> Is there a guideline or a process we can follow?
See [1] for a start, Shane gave a great talk on this
16 matches
Mail list logo
