ส่งจากสมาร์ทโฟน Samsung Galaxy ของฉัน
ข้อความดั้งเดิม จาก: Kenneth Knowles
วันที่: 31/10/19 11:19 (GMT+07:00) ถึง: general
เรื่อง: Re: [VOTE] Accept TubeMQ into the Apache
Incubator
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 8:07 PM Goson zhang wrote:
> +1（non-binding）
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 8:07 PM Goson zhang wrote:
>+1（non-binding）
>
> 发件人： David Nalley
> Date: 2019年10月30日周三 上午9:48
> Subject: [VOTE] Accept TubeMQ into the Apache Incubator
> To:
>
>
> Hi folks,
>
> The [DISCUSS] thread on TubeMQ has died down.
>
> Accordingly, I would lik
+1（non-binding）
发件人： David Nalley
Date: 2019年10月30日周三 上午9:48
Subject: [VOTE] Accept TubeMQ into the Apache Incubator
To:
Hi folks,
The [DISCUSS] thread on TubeMQ has died down.
Accordingly, I would like to call a VOTE to accept TubeMQ into the
Apache Incubator.
Please cast your vote:
Cool!
I see you have mentors lined up. I would love to also be involved as mentor.
The list of initial committers seems a little small. Browsing the commit
history it does seem to be dominated by just a couple of contributors. I
see this is acknowledged (at least implicitly) in the proposal. I ex
https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/documents/grants/caskdata-tephra
On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 at 15:16, Alan Gates wrote:
>
> Regarding SGAs, here's the JIRA for Omid:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OMID-2
> According to
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/foundation/officers/grants.txt C
Hi all,
a short introduction to myself: My name is Dominik Riemer and I'm a
co-initiator of StreamPipes, an open source self-service toolbox for analyzing
IoT data streams. After presenting the tool at this year's ApacheCon NA,
followed by very friendly and fruitful discussions with many peop
Regarding SGAs, here's the JIRA for Omid:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OMID-2
According to
https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/foundation/officers/grants.txt Cask
(original creators of Tephra) submitted a SGA for it and it's one file, but
I don't know where the referenced file is kept.
A
Bertand, thanks for bringing this up. I'll chase those down.
Alan.
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 8:46 AM Bertrand Delacretaz <
bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 3:55 PM Josh Elser wrote:
> > ...My current expectation is that we'd just rename the existing Git
> > re
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 3:55 PM Josh Elser wrote:
> ...My current expectation is that we'd just rename the existing Git
> repositories and change the LDAP group which are used to determine write
> access...
>From the Incubator's point of view, I think an additional step is to
confirm and doc
I like the idea of opt-in for committership for the current podling
membership (without any "time to respond" limitation). I don't foresee
any concerns doing that, but will shout if that becomes an issue.
On 10/28/19 3:09 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
According to [4] the first step of gradua
(w/ VP Phoenix hat)
My current expectation is that we'd just rename the existing Git
repositories and change the LDAP group which are used to determine write
access. In other words, your Git repos will exist just as they do now,
but only at different coordinates.
On 10/25/19 12:27 AM, Ohad S
เมื่อ 30 ต.ค. 2019 12:06 PM "Jean-Baptiste Onofré"
เขียนว่า
> Thanks David !
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 30/10/2019 02:40, David Nalley wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 7:50 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi David,
>>>
>>> Very interesting proposal.
>>>
>>> How do you compare with Apach
เมื่อ 30 ต.ค. 2019 7:52 PM "申远" เขียนว่า
> FYI: If the initial committers really matter, maybe we could ask secretary
> to help us find out how many individuals signed the ICLA when Weex entered
> the Incubator.
>
> Best Regards,
> YorkShen
>
> 申远
>
>
> ซ่อยค่อย ลืมเขาแน่ <0989132858...@gmail.com
FYI: If the initial committers really matter, maybe we could ask secretary
to help us find out how many individuals signed the ICLA when Weex entered
the Incubator.
Best Regards,
YorkShen
申远
ซ่อยค่อย ลืมเขาแน่ <0989132858...@gmail.com> 于2019年10月30日周三 下午8:35写道：
> เมื่อ 30 ต.ค. 2019 7:16 PM "申远"
เมื่อ 30 ต.ค. 2019 7:16 PM "申远" เขียนว่า
> >
> > The PPMC needs to protect their brand in particular from their own
> company.
>
>
> Agree with that, and this is exactly why I am persuading project like
> Weex-UI [1] donated to ASF instead of making them changing their name to
> "XXX powered by A
>
> The PPMC needs to protect their brand in particular from their own company.
Agree with that, and this is exactly why I am persuading project like
Weex-UI [1] donated to ASF instead of making them changing their name to
"XXX powered by Apache Weex" and then pretend there is no problem.
Anyone
Hi,
It seems like there are two concerns around Weex, branding and independent
> community.
>
I'd still like to hear what your mentors think. Are they active?
For branding part, I understand this is a serious issue, and it takes me
> months to solve this kinds of issues
>
This needs to be the P
+1, binding
Best Regards,
Von Gosling
> On Oct 30, 2019, at 9:48 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> The [DISCUSS] thread on TubeMQ has died down.
>
> Accordingly, I would like to call a VOTE to accept TubeMQ into the
> Apache Incubator.
>
> Please cast your vote:
>
> [ ] +1, bring
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 2:48 AM David Nalley wrote:
> ...I would like to call a VOTE to accept TubeMQ into the
> Apache Incubator
+1, binding
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Woonsan
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 10:48 AM David Nalley wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> The [DISCUSS] thread on TubeMQ has died down.
>
> Accordingly, I would like to call a VOTE to accept TubeMQ into the
> Apache Incubator.
>
> Please cast your vote:
>
> [ ] +1, bring TubeMQ int
It seems like there are two concerns around Weex, branding and independent
community.
For branding part, I understand this is a serious issue, and it takes me
months to solve this kinds of issues, like donating weex-loader[1],
weex-cli [2] to ASF, upgrading POM meta [3], changing package name [4],
+1 Binding
-KAM
On 10/30/2019 3:08 AM, Kevin Ratnasekera wrote:
> +1 ( binding )
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 10:38 AM vintagewang wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 9:48 AM David Nalley wrote:
>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> The [DISCUSS] thread on TubeMQ has died down.
>>>
>>> Accordingly,
+1 ( binding )
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 10:38 AM vintagewang wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 9:48 AM David Nalley wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > The [DISCUSS] thread on TubeMQ has died down.
> >
> > Accordingly, I would like to call a VOTE to accept TubeMQ into the
> > Apache Incubator.
23 matches
Mail list logo
