Hi, community
The vote of release Apache Weex (Incubating) 0.26.0-RC2 has passed with
three +1 votes
binding vote:
- Myrle Krantz
- Greg Stein
- Justin Mclean
Vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/afde0ced9b4441e59cb582e99187ed56d4cb5c8f2c228e002418af21@%3Cgeneral.incubator
Hi,
I’m also a PPMC member (Apache Flagon). It seems the Incubator is at an
inflection point—been tracking how different threads on general@ are
capitulating on issues of identity and process. Gian’s points are SPOT on, but
so are Justin’s. I have some reconciliatory thoughts and suggestions, w
Hi,
> Signed off datasketches.
Thanks for that.
Justin
Signed off datasketches.
Kenn
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 3:32 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’ve submitted the incubator board report for this month.
>
> These podling reports are still missing sign off:
> - BatchEE
> - DataSketches
> - DLab
>
> They will be asked to report next month if they
Hi,
I’ve submitted the incubator board report for this month.
These podling reports are still missing sign off:
- BatchEE
- DataSketches
- DLab
They will be asked to report next month if they don’t get signed off. To sign
off these reports please do so in whimsey [1]
I'm a little concerned by
Hi,
> Speaking as a member of a currently-incubating project (Apache Druid) where
> we have always strived to do releases with no known licensing issues, the
> text sounds needlessly scary to downstream consumers.
And that may be the problem with a one solution fits all process. It has been
sugg
Hi,
> What is the requirement for this disclaimer text change?
> Is this coming from Legal? Or is this Incubator policy?
The incubator wold like to make it easies for podlings to make releases,
allowing realises with issues in them is a way of doing this. The legal
committee has been involved i
Hi Justin,
Not yet, I have reached out to them.
Thanks!
Best Regards
Lai
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 2:55 AM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Did you mentors or any other IPMC members vote on this release?
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
>
My thought is that having a scary incubator warning text is the price to be
paid for having an incubator release process that could allow releases with
problems.
The best solution to that is to graduate and get rid of the warning
entirely.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 9:50 AM Gian Merlino wrote:
>
Speaking as a member of a currently-incubating project (Apache Druid) where
we have always strived to do releases with no known licensing issues, the
text sounds needlessly scary to downstream consumers. Especially this part:
> If you are planning to incorporate this work into your
> product/proje
What is the requirement for this disclaimer text change?
Is this coming from Legal? Or is this Incubator policy?
Has this been decided on already or is this text suggestion to be used
for a decision?
J
Am Mi., 10. Juli 2019 um 15:50 Uhr schrieb Matt Sicker :
>
> Since this is sort of a post-relea
Since this is sort of a post-release set of info, I think it’d make sense
to have either a page specific to each version, or at least a section per
version all on a single page (similar to a security issues page might be or
a change log in general).
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 21:24, Justin Mclean
wro
Hi,
Did you mentors or any other IPMC members vote on this release?
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Dear community,
This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.5.0, release
candidate 2.
Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release.
Vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/50fe473a3e03c891caccb8cae8e5195bb740a4758f7688790dff70df@%3Cdev.mxnet.apa
Hello,
On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 at 13:18, Steve Lawrence wrote:
> Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
> (Thursday, 11 July 2019, 8am EST).
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
+1 (binding). I checked; name, sig and hashes, not
15 matches
Mail list logo
