Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes fine
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE OK
- All source files have ASF headers
- No unexpected binary files
- Can compile from source
When voting it’s always a good idea to list what you have checked, a bare +1
gives
Hi,
I also find int a little odd that in the discussion on this release it was not
clearly pointed out that having compiled code in the source release is a
graduation blocking issue and that as a TLP this would not be allowed in a
release, especially given that the exact same issue occurred in
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 8:07 PM Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 12:12 PM Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 11:03 PM Alex Harui
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > But, IMO, the reason the question went to VP Legal is that it doesn't
> > > really matter what the IPMC thi
Hi, Jihoon,
Thanks for the running the release. +1 from me.
Jun
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:59 AM Julian Hyde wrote:
> Forwarding my vote from the dev list:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> I am grateful for Sebb’s thorough review but I don’t see anything that
> blocks the release (e.g. the commit hash is
Ah, I understand. Copyright attribution is misplaced in License file
altogether—appendix gives instruction for how to add a copyright to derivative
works. *palm-to-face*. Thanks and sorry for being thick!
Josh
> On Jun 25, 2019, at 9:10 PM, Joshua Poore wrote:
>
> Hi Justin,
>
> Dave Meik
HI,
> If you want to ask Infra a question, then ask on users@infra or
> private@infra.
Will do, thanks.
> And [1] is 13 years old.
And I said it was old, there are more recent emails along the same lines, but
I'm not able to find them right now. Not surprisingly searching for things
released
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:01 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I apologize for missing that question in the May report.
>
> I've ask esthe question several times over serval months (in slightly
> different forms) and not got a clear answer.
>
> The most recent conversations have been on Slack.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 12:12 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 11:03 PM Alex Harui wrote:
> >
> > But, IMO, the reason the question went to VP Legal is that it doesn't
> > really matter what the IPMC thinks if their "business decision" will have
> > an impact on the "Legal
Hi,
> I apologize for missing that question in the May report.
I've ask esthe question several times over serval months (in slightly different
forms) and not got a clear answer.
The most recent conversations have been on Slack. See for instance [2] or [3]
(where is seems that sometimes infra a
On 6/24/19, 9:12 AM, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote:
> What kinds of policy violations truly affect the legal shield if the
non-compliance:
You're asking the wrong question. You're still asking the TLP question.
I'm asking the TLP question to understand how big the difference is betwe
Hi,
> Dave Meikle and I worked to make the copyrights correct prior to this
> ReRelease.
>
> Our License File reads:
>
> © Copyright 2018 The Apache Software Foundation.
Which is not correct, just keep the original text in the appendix without
specifying a copyright owner. There’s no need
Hi Justin,
Dave Meikle and I worked to make the copyrights correct prior to this
ReRelease.
Our License File reads:
© Copyright 2018 The Apache Software Foundation.
Our Notice Fille reads:
Copyright 2019 The Apache Software Foundation
We thought that was consistent with
https://www.apa
HI,
> Copyrights are 2019 in V2.0.0 under vote now in dev@. Moving forward, we’ll
> be more careful.
Which would still be incorrect that line should say:
Copyright [] [name of copyright owner]
As it where a 3rd party put their copyright notice in their file headers.
Thanks,
Justin
---
Hi General@,
Another friendly reminder to please VOTE on the (Re)Release of Apache Flagon
UserALE (Incubating) 1.0.0.
We have +6 Community votes, +2 binding IPMC votes. We need one more IPMC VOTE
to release!!
Thanks!
> On Jun 24, 2019, at 10:33 AM, Joshua Poore wrote:
>
> Copy.
>
> Copyrig
Forwarding my vote from the dev list:
+1 (binding)
I am grateful for Sebb’s thorough review but I don’t see anything that blocks
the release (e.g. the commit hash is stated in the email even though not given
as a link; the extra text in NOTICE files is a “should” not a “must”). The
project sho
Hi Sebb,
those 2 PRs have been merged into master now. Thanks again for your help.
BTW, I'm wondering what your vote is.
Would you mind clarifying it?
Jihoon
On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 7:20 AM ซ่อยค่อย ลืมเขาแน่ <0989132858...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> ในวันที่ ส. 22 มิ.ย. 2019 04:21 Gian Merlino เขีย
16 matches
Mail list logo
