Hi,
This is a call for a releasing Apache Training Navigating the ASF Incubator
Process 1.0 (incubating)
This is the first release for the Apache Training product. The vote result can
be found here:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/350acb02776cbcdf164cc46d1bf250568a3a10182cd03ff522f578d1@%3
Hi,
Please keep the discussion here and not in the vote thread,
Even if not voting, mentors and IPMC members may want to talk a look at the
material as it is based on several years of talks at ApacheCon and elsewhere.
The idea here is that any IPMC person should be able to take this material an
Is there anything else I need to get looked at?
> On Jun 6, 2019, at 8:45 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
>
> Thanks Justin.
>
>> On Jun 3, 2019, at 14:30, Justin Mclean wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> If that’s no trouble, I’d rather have the text inlined and in the LICENSE
>>> file. Please let me know
Hi,
> I think it would be a mistake to include the word serious in the
> proposal that you are asking for board approval. That likely will
> result in a 'no' response. As would any request that that board
> approve anything that is illegal, like distributing code without
> complying with the ter
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 8:57 PM Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > 1) Is it legal to include GPL licensed software in releases? The
> > answer is yes... as long as we comply with the terms of that license.
> > In the case of strong copyleft licenses, that could mean that the
> > podling release it
I think my position is well-known, but I'll restate it for completeness:
(1) Podling releases are foundation releases; no exceptions. They are
distributed in the same way, adopted by a foundation PMC in the same
manner, and they being with word "Apache". We are responsible for them.
(2) IPMC desir
We’re trying to nail down the definition of “serious”. May I suggest that we
divide the guidelines into MAY, SHOULD and MUST. Anything with MUST is
mandatory for all podling releases.
The list may or may not be the same as for TLP releases.
Julian
Sent from my iPad
> On Jun 7, 2019, at 5:
+1
Best regards
Krzysztof
On 06.06.2019 10:49, James Thomas wrote:
Dear IPMC members,
This is a call for vote to release Apache OpenWhisk Runtime Node.js
v1.14.0 (incubating)
The Apache OpenWhisk community has voted on and approved a proposal to
release Apache OpenWhisk Runtime Node.js v1.14
