On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 11:37 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
> ...Clutch and SVN content is now once a day and regular site editing is
> quick...
Great, thank you very much Dave!
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@i
Hi all,
I have added DataSketches to podlings.xml with help from Dave Fisher [1].
The name search is underway, credit to Lee Rhodes [2].
Next steps as I understand them are to set up:
- podling status page
- DNS
- LDAP
- web site
- mailing lists
- git repo
I am not confident o
Hi IPMC,
The Apache Druid community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
Apache Druid (incubating) 0.14.0 (rc3).
We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
incubator release.
Project description: Apache Druid (incubating) is a high performance
analytics da
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16808168#comment-16808168
]
Dave Fisher commented on INCUBATOR-231:
---
Bertrand I had to follow your plan. The
Hi -
Website build is now functional.
Clutch and SVN content is now once a day and regular site editing is quick.
More later.
Regards,
Dave
> On Apr 2, 2019, at 12:35 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> I’m working on process to split the clutch and svn analysis and the normal
> git procedures.
>
>
I’m working on process to split the clutch and svn analysis and the normal git
procedures.
I ran into a problem (Bertrand warned me …). It’s going to take several hours
to fix. Mostly I’ve got some errands to run and I need to clear my mind.
Regards,
Dave
> On Apr 2, 2019, at 12:22 PM, Apache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dave Fisher updated INCUBATOR-231:
--
Comment: was deleted
(was: {quote}I'm not sure if you can push to the master branch from a J
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16808065#comment-16808065
]
Dave Fisher commented on INCUBATOR-231:
---
{quote}I'm not sure if you can push to
On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 19:28, Marcelo Vanzin wrote:
>
> The Apache Livy team is proud to announce the release of Apache Livy
> 0.6.0-incubating.
>
> Livy is web service that exposes a REST interface for managing long
> running Apache Spark contexts in your cluster. Livy enables
> programmatic, faul
(Apologies to all, this is the same announcement as previously, but
including the missing disclaimer.)
The Apache Livy team is proud to announce the release of Apache Livy
0.6.0-incubating.
Livy is web service that exposes a REST interface for managing long
running Apache Spark contexts in your c
The Apache Livy team is proud to announce the release of Apache Livy
0.6.0-incubating.
Livy is web service that exposes a REST interface for managing long
running Apache Spark contexts in your cluster. Livy enables
programmatic, fault-tolerant, multi-tenant submission of Spark jobs
from web/mobile
Note that ?filename only works with action=download; that will start
an immediate download.
However that does not allow users to change the mirror except by
reloading the URL.
On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 18:55, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> Hi Sebb,
>
> I’ve another place to fix - clutch2status.py - doing so
Hi Sebb,
I’ve another place to fix - clutch2status.py - doing so now - thanks!
Regards,
Dave
> On Apr 2, 2019, at 10:18 AM, s...@apache.org wrote:
>
> Author: sebb
> Date: Tue Apr 2 17:18:41 2019
> New Revision: 1856835
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1856835&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix d
Hi -
I recently added a detailed clutch analysis page for each podling. It is
helpful for these situations as it lists all the releases in a flat sorted
manner:
https://incubator.apache.org/clutch/openwhisk.html
Similar analysis could be added for TLPs …
It also shows OpenWhisk 51 git reposit
We have a fun layout in Logging:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/logging/
On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 07:46, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 2:39 PM David P Grove wrote:
> > ...For us, using the the version as the primary organizing metric in the
> > dist
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16807853#comment-16807853
]
Dave Fisher commented on INCUBATOR-231:
---
I think that the concern is that the au
On 02/04/2019 16.53, Ate Douma wrote:
On 02/04/2019 16.41, Ross Gardler wrote:
Myrle makes a good point. As a mentor (is been a long time though) I
tried to cast my vote after there were at least 3 views from the
community. Once I saw the ppmc catching issues I was missing, or I was
simpl
On 02/04/2019 16.41, Ross Gardler wrote:
Myrle makes a good point. As a mentor (is been a long time though) I tried to
cast my vote after there were at least 3 views from the community. Once I saw
the ppmc catching issues I was missing, or I was simply ratifying their view,
it was time to g
On 02/04/2019 13.58, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 11:30 AM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
...Maybe the PPMC and IPMC vote could run in parallel...
I think the reason for having two votes is to give an opportunity for
mentors to catch issues in the first one without both
I agree with the point from Myrle and Ross, I dislike the idea of parallel
votes.
Especially in the early stages we had multiple RCs which failed in the PPMC
Vote process.
I would not like to have them on the general@ list, as that adds a lot of noise.
Julian
Am 02.04.19, 16:41 schrieb "Ross G
Myrle makes a good point. As a mentor (is been a long time though) I tried to
cast my vote after there were at least 3 views from the community. Once I saw
the ppmc catching issues I was missing, or I was simply ratifying their view,
it was time to graduate.
The IPMC should have nothing to do w
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 2:09 PM Bertrand Delacretaz <
bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 11:30 AM Geertjan Wielenga
> wrote:
> > ...Maybe the PPMC and IPMC vote could run in parallel...
>
> I think the reason for having two votes is to give an opportunity for
> men
Hi Dave,
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 2:39 PM David P Grove wrote:
> ...For us, using the the version as the primary organizing metric in the dist
> isn't a great fit. Is there a precedent for doing otherwise (eg, first by
> component, then the active branches within each component)?...
As an example
"Henk P. Penning" wrote on 04/02/2019 07:13:11 AM:
>
>At the moment, OpenWhisk has in /dist/incubator/openwhisk/ :
>
>apache-openwhisk-0.9.0-incubating/
>apache-openwhisk-0.9.8-incubating/
>apache-openwhisk-0.10.0-incubating/
>apache-openwhisk-1.12.0-incubati
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 1:13 PM Henk P. Penning wrote:
>...If possbile, please remove 'older' releases from
> https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/openwhisk/ ...
Good point Henk!
Note that older releases are archived automatically under
http://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/open
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 11:30 AM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> ...Maybe the PPMC and IPMC vote could run in parallel...
I think the reason for having two votes is to give an opportunity for
mentors to catch issues in the first one without bothering the IPMC.
So maybe run parallel votes from the
Hi
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 9:20 PM James Thomas wrote:
> This is a call for vote to release Apache OpenWhisk Client JS (incubating)
> 3.19.0
+1 for the release of this archive, with a few minor things to fix for
the next release, see below.
SHA512(../openwhisk-client-js-3.19.0-incubating-source
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 1:20 AM Justin Mclean wrote:
> ...I notice that the project when compiled it downloads this file [1] (and
> other places), the text
> of which is still under copyright, it’s currently unclear how to deal with
> this.
> There is a discussion on legal-discuss about it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16807665#comment-16807665
]
Bertrand Delacretaz commented on INCUBATOR-234:
---
I agree with a page spe
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019, Dave Grove wrote:
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 16:01:05 +
From: Dave Grove
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] release Apache OpenWhisk Package Alarm,
Package Cloudant, and Package Kafka 2.0.0 (incubating)
Hi Dave,
We will proceed with the 2.0.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16807662#comment-16807662
]
Bertrand Delacretaz commented on INCUBATOR-231:
---
I'm not sure if you can
Parallel would solve our problem of delayed bookkeeping as well. good idea.
It is not so much about about the initial 72 hours, rather the pause
then another 72hrs that someone having to remember. Podlings have a
stateful experience during a release.. they have to know which are in
what stage. vot
Maybe the PPMC and IPMC vote could run in parallel -- a key reason why we
in Apache NetBeans are looking forward to graduation is that we'll not need
to go through the loop of (1) PPMC approves, (2) IPMC rejects, (3) PPMC
needs to put together a new release and vote on it again, (4) IPMC rejects
ag
Hi,
I like Craigs suggestion and I'm aware of the problem with the ASF Policy if we
would skip the formal IPMC Vote.
On the other hand in PLC4X we had a discussion about a regular release cycle to
bring new features to the users as fast as possible and decided to skip that
for now, to keep the
34 matches
Mail list logo
