+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019, 10:15 PM Furkan KAMACI wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> 28 Şub 2019 Per, saat 08:40 tarihinde Henry Saputra <
> henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
> şunu yazdı:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 8:44 PM Markus Weimer wrote:
> >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> >
+1 (binding)
28 Şub 2019 Per, saat 08:40 tarihinde Henry Saputra
şunu yazdı:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 8:44 PM Markus Weimer wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > we've discussed the proposal for the TVM project in [1]. The proposal
> > itself can
> > be found on the wiki [2].
> >
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 8:44 PM Markus Weimer wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> we've discussed the proposal for the TVM project in [1]. The proposal
> itself can
> be found on the wiki [2].
>
> According to the Incubator rules[3] I'd like to call a vote to accept the
> new
> TVM project as
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:44 PM Markus Weimer wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> we've discussed the proposal for the TVM project in [1]. The proposal
> itself can
> be found on the wiki [2].
>
> According to the Incubator rules[3] I'd like to call a vote to accept the
> new
> TVM project
+1 (binding)
On 27.02.19 23:44, Markus Weimer wrote:
Hi everyone,
we've discussed the proposal for the TVM project in [1]. The proposal itself can
be found on the wiki [2].
According to the Incubator rules[3] I'd like to call a vote to accept the new
TVM project as a podling in the Apache Incu
I agree, this will be good learning experience for the podling PPMC.
Thanks Craig.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 1:02 PM Craig Russell wrote:
> I think this is a good opportunity for me to suggest:
>
> As part of mentorship, review of releases is a requirement.
>
> This vote passed in the podling wit
+1 (non-binding)
-sz
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 8:44 PM Markus Weimer wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> we've discussed the proposal for the TVM project in [1]. The proposal
> itself can
> be found on the wiki [2].
>
> According to the Incubator rules[3] I'd like to call a vote to accept the
> new
> TVM p
Bit more clarifications, as new podling in Apache, the initial members of
PPMC consist of mentors and initial commiters of the project.
I understand TVM already work mirroring ASF meritoracy [1] but we need to
change the proposal to follow Apache guidelines to help us cross check
membership later
+1 (binding)
NOTICE, LICENSE, and DISCLAIMER files exist
ASF Header exists and correct
No executable files in source artifact
- Henry
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 9:54 AM Piyush Ghai wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks everyone for spending the time to test and vote.
>
> This vote passes with 5 +1 votes (4
Hi everyone,
we've discussed the proposal for the TVM project in [1]. The proposal itself can
be found on the wiki [2].
According to the Incubator rules[3] I'd like to call a vote to accept the new
TVM project as a podling in the Apache Incubator.
A vote for accepting a new Apache Incubator podl
yay! so many goodies in this release, looking forward to see it out.
Kudos to everyone who assisted in the release...
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 9:54 AM Piyush Ghai wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks everyone for spending the time to test and vote.
>
> This vote passes with 5 +1 votes (4 binding) and no 0
On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 at 07:43, David P Grove wrote:
>
> Or in the case of the current OpenWhisk podling voting thread [1], our only
> mentor has already voted +1, but after a week we still need two more IPMC
> votes to be able to proceed.
>
> Please help
>
As of sometime over the past day or so,
I think this is a good opportunity for me to suggest:
As part of mentorship, review of releases is a requirement.
This vote passed in the podling with zero votes from mentors.
There is no evidence that I could find in the podling vote thread that anyone
actually reviewed the release artifacts.
Thanks Markus! Will be ready for the help!
27 Şub 2019 Çar, saat 20:32 tarihinde Henry Saputra
şunu yazdı:
> Thanks, Marcus. Looking forward for the VOTE thread.
>
> This would be great addition to Apache Software Foundation.
>
> - Henry
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 9:56 AM Markus Weimer wrote:
Hi all,
Thanks everyone for spending the time to test and vote.
This vote passes with 5 +1 votes (4 binding) and no 0 or -1 votes.
+1 votes
Henri Yandell / binding
Jason Dai / binding
Justin Mclean / binding
Michael Wall / binding
Sheng Zha
0 votes
No votes
-1 votes
No votes
I will move forw
Thanks, Marcus. Looking forward for the VOTE thread.
This would be great addition to Apache Software Foundation.
- Henry
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 9:56 AM Markus Weimer wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the discussion thus far. Based on it, I have uploaded
> an updated proposal here:
>
> https://wiki
Thanks, Jason. Will work with team to help follow up with the release
artifacts
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 1:52 AM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Thanks a lot for pointing us to issues we have currently.
>
> If you need a hand with anything or have any questions just ask.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
>
The voting is closed and has passed with 3 +1, 1 +0, and no -1 votes.
+1 Bertrand Delacretaz, Kevin McGrail, Justin McLean
+0 Sheng Wu
Justin noted that the end year in the notice file should be updated to 2019 in
the next release; this has been fixed in master and will be correct in the next
I will grant it to you.
Regards
JB
Le 27 févr. 2019 à 12:53, à 12:53, Liang Chen a écrit:
>Hi
>
>I am new IPMC, helping a new project. Request the right to create new
>proposal on incubator wiki
>https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ProjectProposals
>
>Thanks in advance.
>
>Regards
>Liang
>
>
>
>--
I would consider it a mentor responsibility, just like any other advise on
the way towards graduation. There could be explicit mention in the maturity
assessment / checklist.
--
sent from mobile
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019, 11:33 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > But my proposal to move towards offe
Hi
I am new IPMC, helping a new project. Request the right to create new
proposal on incubator wiki
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ProjectProposals
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Liang
--
Sent from: http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/
Hi,
> Thanks a lot for pointing us to issues we have currently.
If you need a hand with anything or have any questions just ask.
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional c
Craig,
replies inline,
> Apologies if these comments cross other discussions. It's hard to keep
> track of all the threads that have forked from the original discussion.
I'm struggling to keep up too :-/
> This is really sad, because in most of these cases the mentors have not
> voted. And
Hi,
Thanks a lot for pointing us to issues we have currently.
Will fix it asap.
> On Feb 27, 2019, at 04:26, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry but I’m also -1 (binding) as there is a number of issues here, there’s
> compiled code in the release, the LICENSE and NOTICE files need some wo
> On the one side we have lengthy discussions about non-mentors from
> resisting to interfere, but on the other hand podlings are begging for
> such "interference".
> Guess there are always two sides of the discussion.
I politely disagree with you Chris.
What I raised was that cold interfere
I would be super interested in these topics as we're also considering
joining the Apache Incubator with MorphL Community Edition:
https://github.com/Morphl-AI/MorphL-Community-Edition
Big +1!
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:58 AM Mick Semb Wever wrote:
>
> > An Incubator Welcome Wagon could be a Gui
> An Incubator Welcome Wagon could be a Guide of Guides and include
> introductory information about:
>
> (0) Onboarding
> (1) Community Development
> (2) Infrastructure and Builds
> (3) Legal Policy
> (4) Release Policy
> (5) Press
> (6) Foundation Structure
+1 from me.
I think also the men
>From a point of view of Myriad - 2 - Benjamin Hindman, Ted Dunning. I
have to say, the only active mentor is Ted, unfortunately Benjamin is
not active in this project. So we need more mentoring in order to
unlock the rebooting of the project, in my opinion.
Any help would be appreciated!
--
Javi
28 matches
Mail list logo
