So now the files in the maven-wrapper have all the correct headers?
So all I need to do is replace the versions in the Apache repos with that
version and add something to the Notice and/or license and we're all good?
I knew that binary files can't be checked in, therefore I wrote that pr that
e
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 9:52 PM Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> I think Kava is enough of a conflict that it will need to change,
> eventually. I think it is OK to keep it as Cava for entry into the
> incubator since it already exists but change ASAP:
>
Changing names is a real Pain for the Infra team.
I think Kava is enough of a conflict that it will need to change,
eventually. I think it is OK to keep it as Cava for entry into the
incubator since it already exists but change ASAP:
- Talk about "Apache Cava (incubating)" will not build the new project's
reputation as well (for example, I actua
For anyone who is interested from the Gradle side of things, you can look
at what we do for the Groovy project. We do include the (Gradle) wrapper
files in our git repo but NOT in our source distribution zip. There is one
extra step in our build process/line in our README that explains how to
popul
The request to donate the wrapper was closed won't fix (they did
adjust the license headers)
I've made a comment on a 3+ year old issue on maven itself, which had
excluded the wrapper due to perceived problems in performing change
inside the ASF
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-5937?focu
Hi Justin,
Can you please elaborate on release policy issues with Singa ?
I checked a few things but couldn't find the issue.
Thanks,
Thejas
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 5:51 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So I just checked the next bunch of podlings to report to see if we have
> any other iss
The Apache OpenWhisk community has voted to release Apache OpenWhisk
Composer (incubating) version 0.10.0. The voting thread can be found here:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/801edac7a4d58436a5411fc1fbca523f24056195bdb149f9c2cdc2b8@%3Cdev.openwhisk.apache.org%3E
We request that IPMC Membe
Thanks, everyone for helpful feedbacks. I would like to clarify a few
points being raised so far on behalf of the current TVM PMC.
> PMC vs PMC member
Thanks for pointing it out. This is something we overlooked and will update
the proposal to make the change accordingly.
> Champion
Markus has b
I'm trying to read up as much as I can on the Incubator (podling startup)
processes and it took me surprisingly long to find the podlings.xml file
that's referred to in some places.
This lead me to dig into the SVN structure and I found that the Incubator
also has a Git repository.
Can someone cl
All,
ASF policy states that:
"Apache projects must host official website content on an apache.org domain"
That said, if there are issues with access speeds from some locations
I'd strongly urge affected projects to engage with our infrastructure
team to find a solution. Maybe we can set up a
First, a heartfelt thank you to all for participating in this discussion.
I am tempted to keep Cava _for now_ given this late feedback, and proceed to
proposing the project.
To be more precise, I recommend we get the project into the incubator with this
name. We can change the name of the projec
Sure,will bring this once after starting mailing list.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 8:44 PM Lars Francke wrote:
> Would you mind bringing this up either in the DISCUSS thread or after we've
> started (it looks like we're good to go) on the mailing lists there. I
> touched on this in the proposal and
If the project is already known as Cava and is looking to move to Apache, I
would recommend starting off as Cava. I can see that there's already a
presence for it - https://github.com/ConsenSys/cava
However, I can see there's a pretty strong conflict on the name -
https://kava.io/
John
On Mon,
I agree that it doesn't matter if it "meant" something, you can simply
forget the original meaning.
So it could mean "Cryptographic Java"
Here are other suggestions, because I like have the block and/or in the name :)
- Blockava
- Blockva
- Chainava
Please note I didn't do any proper name searc
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 6:52 PM Michael Wall wrote:
> Interesting proposal. I would be interested in helping. Seems like you
> don't need anymore mentors so I can volunteer in any capacity you need.
>
> I think you are going to have trouble with the name though as
> https://cava.com/ is a great
Consensus Java :)
> On Feb 16, 2019, at 1:59 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
>
> I explained it in the proposal and the original thread, Cava stands for
> “ConsenSys Java”, after Guava.
>
> It’s not a bad name per se, so let’s add it to the proposals.
>
>> On Feb 16, 2019, at 9:58 AM, Henry Saputra
Would you mind bringing this up either in the DISCUSS thread or after we've
started (it looks like we're good to go) on the mailing lists there. I
touched on this in the proposal and received no comments during the
discussion phase.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 6:07 AM Brahma Reddy Battula
wrote:
> +
Hello everyone,
thank you for voting so far. We have already had more than the 72 hours but
I won't get around to do much until Wednesday this week so it doesn't hurt
to leave this open for two more days.
That said we already have more than enough vote for a successful outcome.
Thank you,
Lars
Thanks for the feedback. Sadly, It looks like really get the network issue.
In my mind, hosting `weex.io` site out ASF is not right.
--
Sheng Wu
Apache SkyWalking, ShardingSphere, Zipkin
Twitter, wusheng1108
-- Original --
From: "";
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 11:44 AM Justin Mclean wrote:
> > If the Apache License works for those artifacts I think that's fine...
>
> It probably doesn’t, but it's complex and INAL, but I have touched on this
> about this in IoT talks at previous ApacheCons...
FWIW the prior discussions that
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 7:05 AM Mick Semb Wever wrote:
> One of the tings I've noticed is that the vetos on a podling's first
> release can be a bit harsh.
>
> On releases I would rather see such vetos replaced with comments that are
> feedback, while still obvious that they are an issue that i
Hi,
> If the Apache License works for those artifacts I think that's fine, and
> personally I like it a lot if we're expanding into new fields.
It probably doesn’t, but it's complex and INAL, but I have touched on this
about this in IoT talks at previous ApacheCons. TLDR version is some aspects
Congratulations, at meantime it would be nice if you could share all of us
the plan of the next release.
-Ian.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 6:07 PM Minxuan Zhuang wrote:
> Hi community,
>
> The Apache Dubbo(incubating) team is pleasured to announce that the
> Apache Dubbo OPS (Incubating) 0.1 has ju
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 7:42 PM Markus Weimer wrote:
> ...(3) The project contains hardware as a software artifact. We are not
> aware of another ASF project like that and wonder if and how it
> affects its acceptance into the incubator...
If the Apache License works for those artifacts I th
> weex.apache.org is fast too from my network environment now.
The Chinese network status is strange, we all know. :) Right?
> We had received several complaint years ago from Chinese users that
weex.apache.org is slow, so we launched weex-project.io with the same
content of weex.apache.org. If
weex.apache.org is fast too from my network environment now.
We had received several complaint years ago from Chinese users that
weex.apache.org is slow, so we launched weex-project.io with the same
content of weex.apache.org. If this is against rules, I think we can make
it redirect to weex.apach
Hi
I don't know why it is slow, I just tried, very quickly.
--
Sheng Wu
Apache SkyWalking, ShardingSphere, Zipkin
Twitter, wusheng1108
-- Original --
From: "申远";
Date: Mon, Feb 18, 2019 04:33 PM
To: "general";
Subject: Re: Fwd: [DI
>
> 3. I don't think ASF websites are facing GFW issue.
ASF website is quite slow when accessing from China, I am not sure whether
this is a GFW issue or simply the server is on another continent without a
CDN.
We received complains about weex.apache.org from China mainland years ago,
so we deplo
Hi All,
We are pleased to announce the release of Apache Doris 0.9.0-incubating.
Apache Doris (incubating) is an MPP-based interactive SQL data warehousing
for reporting and analysis.
The release is available at:
http://doris.apache.org/downloads.html
Thanks to everyone who has contributed to t
29 matches
Mail list logo
