Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 3]

Hi, -1 (binding) I’ve not checked everything yet on this release but I as it contains compiled code I can’t vote +1. I don’t think these are OK except perhaps the first one: ./platform/autoupdate.services/test/unit/src/org/netbeans/api/autoupdate/data/empty.jar ./platform/autoupdate.services/t

Re: Roster setting of ShardingSphere.

Hi Craig Thanks for taking care of this. BTW, I just added the Zhao Jun who just got the committer right recently into PPMC. Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 3:15 AM Craig Russell wrote: > > I've just now created the LDAP structure and added the four in

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.6 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

Hi, +1 binding but there’s a LICENSE issue than needs to be fixed in the next release. I checkered: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes correct - DISCLAIMER exists (although name of the project inside is a little odd) - LICENSE and NOTICE have a few minor issues (see below) - No unexpec

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 1.10.1 (incubating)

Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE correct - No unexpected binary files - All ASF source code has ASF headers I don’t have the setup to test if it compiles. One minor thing I’d remove the "Apache Airflow contain

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache Dubbo (Incubating) 2.6.5 [RC1]

HI, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE good - No binary files in source release - Can compile from source Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: How to review so-called "binary releases"?

+1 to what Bertrand wrote. Solves the problem very neatly. Thank you, Bertrand. It goes a long way towards answering my original question, because “What should voters check for when reviewing binary artifacts?” is now a matter for each PMC, not a matter for the Foundation. +1 to Roman’s suggest

Re: How to review so-called "binary releases"?

On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 6:59 AM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > > > On Nov 15, 2018, at 2:41 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > > wrote: > > > > > > I see this as a two-level thing: > > > > a) The source release is an Act of the Foundation, it is what the > > foundation produces > > > > b) For the binaries, t

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 1.10.1 (incubating)

+1 (binding) * Sig/checksums look good * DISCLAIMER/NOTICE/LICENSE good * Spot check on headers passed * Install succeeded. -Jakob On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 11:39 AM Hitesh Shah wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Looked at the source tar ball: > - DISCLAIMER looks good > - rat-check was clean > - L

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.6 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

Now provided sha256 checksum checked to be correct. Hereby changing my vote back to +1 (binding) Regards, Ate On 19/11/2018 15.40, Ate Douma wrote: Sorry about overlooking this before, but as Henk P. Penning indicated release artifacts now MUST be accompanied by a SHA-256 and/or SHA-512 checks

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 3]

Thanks, Laszlo. sha256 checksum checked to be correct. Hereby reconfirming my previous +1 (binding) Regards, Ate On 20/11/2018 19.56, Laszlo Kishalmi wrote: SHA256 checksum has been provided. I've not removed the SHA1 ones from this staging area, but wont move them over to the final release a

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 1.10.1 (incubating)

+1 (binding) Looked at the source tar ball: - DISCLAIMER looks good - rat-check was clean - License and NOTICE files look good. - Signatures and checksums verified thanks Hitesh On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 3:45 AM Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > Done, (and updated our project scripts to not

[jira] [Created] (INCUBATOR-227) The Release of OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: OpenWhisk composer

Dave Grove created INCUBATOR-227: Summary: The Release of OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: OpenWhisk composer Key: INCUBATOR-227 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-227 Project: Incubator

Re: Roster setting of ShardingSphere.

I've just now created the LDAP structure and added the four initial committers who have Apache ids. As new committers file their iclas we will need to track the status page to keep it in sync. Craig > On Nov 20, 2018, at 11:08 AM, Chris Lambertus wrote: > > Part of the podling bootstrapping

Re: Roster setting of ShardingSphere.

Part of the podling bootstrapping process is having someone with appropriate karma create the LDAP entry via Whimsy at https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/shardingsphere . For a brand new podling, there will be a button that says “create L

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 3]

SHA256 checksum has been provided. I've not removed the SHA1 ones from this staging area, but wont move them over to the final release area. So the SHA256 sum for the package we are voting on is: 289e750c2c70799b9cd4673b70879ccb086d6b365f8889f94b99ab7d0d887809 incubating-netbeans-10.0-vc3-sour

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-222) Donation of ibm-functions/composer code to Apache OpenWhisk

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16693538#comment-16693538 ] Bertrand Delacretaz commented on INCUBATOR-222: --- Incubator PMC vote pass

[RESULT][VOTE][LAZY][IP CLEARANCE] OpenWhisk Composer

On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 4:38 PM Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > ...The OpenwWhisk podling would like to accept a donation of the Composer > module, as per https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-222 > See http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/openwhisk-composer.html ... This vote passes b

I'd like to volunteer for mentoring S2Graph

Hi, I'd like to volunteer for a mentor for S2Graph project. I think there's only one mentor remaining there, so I'd like to help the community and project have a positive journey together and represent themselves better. I became a member this year and IPMC member recently. I am a PMC member for P