Sorry Justin,
Previously I read
`
PMC members have formally binding votes, but in general community members
are encouraged to vote, even if their votes are only advisory.
`
I learned now. Thanks!
Justin Mclean 于2018年11月8日周四 下午7:15写道：
> Hi,
>
> > On 9 Nov 2018, at 11:07 am, Fu Maosong wrote:
>
Hi -
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 8, 2018, at 3:43 AM, Myrle Krantz wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 7:10 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
>>
>> Hi -
>>
...I propose this:
If someone has done several of the following:
- has been involved in an incubating project from start to fin
Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signature and hashes fine, but you may want to check the file extensions as
policy changed a little while back to what was allowed
- LICENSE and NOTICE good
- no binary files
- no source files, but poms have ASF headers
- can compile from “sourc
+1
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 12:18 PM Gilbert Song wrote:
> +1 (non-binding).
>
> - Gilbert
>
> On 2018/11/07 17:44:21, Raja Sundaram Ganesan wrote:
> > +1 (Non Binding)
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed 7 Nov, 2018, 11:02 vintagewang >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > XIAORUI Wang
> > >
> > > zhangli...@
Hi,
> And on that note: those 72hours elapses today. Any IPMC votes would be
> greatly appreciated!
Your mentors are IPMC member and can vote on this release, given it basically
contains nothing I’m not sure why they haven’t.
Thanks,
Justin
-
Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name (although I notice the pip package doesn’t - is this a
limitation?)
- signatures and hashes all good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE file
- all source files have ASF headers
- No binary files in release
- Can compile from source
Thanks,
Hi,
> On 9 Nov 2018, at 11:07 am, Fu Maosong wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
Thanks, for voting but Just a reminder that only IPMC votes are binding.
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
Hi,
> This vote has been open for 8 days. If you have some time, please provide
> any feedback to help us improve.
I suggest you contact your mentors (you have 4) and ask them to vote as they
are IPMC members.
Thanks,
Justin
-
Hi,
>Tue November 13 -- Mentor signoff due by end of day
There a few podlings that still don’t have sign off and only a few days to go
(Tuesday) until that is due, the report will be submitted on next Wednesday.
Podlings without sign-off will need to report agin next month.
Thanks,
Justin
I am willing to help.
On Fri, 9 Nov 2018 at 3:36 AM, lewis john mcgibbney
wrote:
> Hi Folks,
> We are looking for new motivated mentors for the Apache SensSoft
> (Incubating) project [0] look at that kick ass Website :)
> In a nutshell SensSoft is a generalized user behavioral logging platform
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Wei Chen updated INCUBATOR-225:
---
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
> Missing Link on Incubator Website
> --
Wei Chen created INCUBATOR-225:
--
Summary: Missing Link on Incubator Website
Key: INCUBATOR-225
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-225
Project: Incubator
Issue Type: Bug
+1(binding)
Willem Jiang
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 3:28 AM Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> Hi -
>
> This is a VOTE to accept the brpc Project into the Apache Incubator.
>
> It will last for at least 72 hours and will pass if at least 3 +1 IPMC Votes
> and more IPMC Vot
+1 (binding)
Neng Lu 于2018年11月8日周四 下午3:43写道：
> Hi All,
>
> This vote has been open for 8 days. If you have some time, please provide
> any feedback to help us improve.
> Thank you very much!
>
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:31 AM Neng Lu wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > This is the 5th release candid
Hi All,
This vote has been open for 8 days. If you have some time, please provide
any feedback to help us improve.
Thank you very much!
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:31 AM Neng Lu wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This is the 5th release candidate for Apache Heron, version
> 0.20.0-incubating. Thanks everyone
Please vote to approve the release of Apache Toree 0.3.0-incubating (RC1).
The podling dev vote thread:
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@toree.incubator.apache.org/msg01914.html
And the result:
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@toree.incubator.apache.org/msg01927.html
Tag: v0.3.0-incubating-rc1 (
Hi Folks,
We are looking for new motivated mentors for the Apache SensSoft
(Incubating) project [0] look at that kick ass Website :)
In a nutshell SensSoft is a generalized user behavioral logging platform
for web pages and thin-client applications.
The podling was accepted into the Apache Incubato
+1 non-binding
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 4:25 AM Justin Mclean wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>
The Jim we are in strongly agreement then :-)
Willem
Yes I think that’s the word “DISCLAIMER”, was the concept and idea I was
describing.
I think it depends on the binary (ie npm tgz, jar, docker image, dll,
executable) and location (website, sftp, maven, npm registry, nuget, etc) on
where to
+1. (binding)
Willem Jiang
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 3:47 PM hxd wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Sorry for the previous mail with bad format.
> I'd like to call a VOTE to accept IoTDB project, a database for managing
> large amounts of time series data from IoT sensors in
+1 (Binding) though I vote we call it Apache Burp or Apache Hiccup ;-)
On 11/8/2018 2:43 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 at 13:30, Julian Hyde wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>>> On Nov 8, 2018, at 11:29 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Da
Hi,
> @Justin I understand the need for this to be transitive but what if the
> artifact has contracting licenses, e.g. as mentioned BSD-c2 vs BSD-c3? I
> assume it is not our problem to figure this out but just put whatever is in
> there in our LICENSE file?=
I would probably put both in the
+1 (binding)
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 5, 2018, at 10:41 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> on behalf of Sharding-Sphere community, I'd like to call
> a VOTE to accept it into the Apache Incubator. The full
> proposal is available on the wiki:
>https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Sha
+1 (non-binding).
- Gilbert
On 2018/11/07 17:44:21, Raja Sundaram Ganesan wrote:
> +1 (Non Binding)
>
>
>
> On Wed 7 Nov, 2018, 11:02 vintagewang
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > XIAORUI Wang
> >
> > zhangli...@apache.org 于2018年11月7日 周三09:30写道：
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > Thanks,
>
+1 (binding)
On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 at 13:30, Julian Hyde wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> > On Nov 8, 2018, at 11:29 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dave
> >
> >> On Nov 8, 2018, at 11:25 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi -
> >>
> >> This is a VOTE to accept the brpc P
+1 (binding)
> On Nov 8, 2018, at 11:29 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
>> On Nov 8, 2018, at 11:25 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>
>> Hi -
>>
>> This is a VOTE to accept the brpc Project into the Apache Incubator.
>>
>> It will last for at least 72 hours and will p
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Dave
> On Nov 8, 2018, at 11:25 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> Hi -
>
> This is a VOTE to accept the brpc Project into the Apache Incubator.
>
> It will last for at least 72 hours and will pass if at least 3 +1 IPMC Votes
> and more IPMC Votes are +1 than -1.
>
> [ ] +1, a
Hi -
This is a VOTE to accept the brpc Project into the Apache Incubator.
It will last for at least 72 hours and will pass if at least 3 +1 IPMC Votes
and more IPMC Votes are +1 than -1.
[ ] +1, accept the brpc proposal.
[ ] -1, reject the brpc proposal
Regards,
Dave
= brpc Proposal =
=== Ab
Cancelling due to incorrect subject.
> On Nov 8, 2018, at 11:06 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> Hi -
>
> This is a VOTE to accept the brpc Project into the Apache Incubator.
>
> It will last for at least 72 hours and will pass if at least 3 +1 IPMC Votes
> and more IPMC Votes are +1 than -1.
>
>
I think autocorrect messed with the subject line of this call-to-vote.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Fisher
Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2018 11:06 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Accept burp into the Apache Incubator
External
Hi -
This is a VOTE to accept the brpc
Darn acid reflux!
Thanks Julian
> On Nov 8, 2018, at 11:17 AM, Julian Hyde wrote:
>
> Dave,
>
> You’ll want to cancel this vote. The subject line is an unfortunate victim of
> auto-correct.
>
> Julian
>
>
>> On Nov 8, 2018, at 11:06 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>
>> Hi -
>>
>> This is a VOTE
Dave,
You’ll want to cancel this vote. The subject line is an unfortunate victim of
auto-correct.
Julian
> On Nov 8, 2018, at 11:06 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> Hi -
>
> This is a VOTE to accept the brpc Project into the Apache Incubator.
>
> It will last for at least 72 hours and will pass
+1 (binding)
> On Nov 8, 2018, at 11:06 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> Hi -
>
> This is a VOTE to accept the brpc Project into the Apache Incubator.
>
> It will last for at least 72 hours and will pass if at least 3 +1 IPMC Votes
> and more IPMC Votes are +1 than -1.
>
> [ ] +1, accept the brpc
Hi -
This is a VOTE to accept the brpc Project into the Apache Incubator.
It will last for at least 72 hours and will pass if at least 3 +1 IPMC Votes
and more IPMC Votes are +1 than -1.
[ ] +1, accept the brpc proposal.
[ ] -1, reject the brpc proposal
Regards,
Dave
= brpc Proposal =
=== Ab
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 7, 2018, at 11:10 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> brpc also includes third party code in the source tree.
>>
>> * https://github.com/brpc/brpc/tree/master/src/butil/third_party (BSD, MIT,
>> MPL, and Public Domain)
>
> Being category B the MPL code may b
Hi,
I also think any negative votes -1 are veto for committer and PMC.
Assigning roles in a community is a very sensitive subject so allowing veto
seems natural for me, but playing democracy is dangerous. We still have for
example -0.9 vote that means not a veto but disagreement.
Sincerely,
Dmitr
@Alex @Julian ok, I understand the convenience argument.
@Vincent thanks for the input, the licenses in an extra folder is certainly
an option to consider.
@Justin I understand the need for this to be transitive but what if the
artifact has contracting licenses, e.g. as mentioned BSD-c2 vs BSD
Hi,
> brpc also includes third party code in the source tree.
>
> * https://github.com/brpc/brpc/tree/master/src/butil/third_party (BSD, MIT,
> MPL, and Public Domain)
Being category B the MPL code may be an issue as it probably can’t be included
in a source release. [1]
Thanks,
Justin
1.
h
Looks like I forgot to include duration in my initial message. Of
course, this will run for at least the customary 72hours.
And on that note: those 72hours elapses today. Any IPMC votes would be
greatly appreciated!
- Josh
On 11/5/18 2:09 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
IPMC,
Please vote on the foll
Hi Ariam, I got your voicemail again Feel free to ping me back at
703.798.0171 and we can coordinate a face to face meeting. Regards,
KAM
--
Kevin A. McGrail
VP Fundraising, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 7:10 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
> Hi -
>
> >> ...I propose this:
> >>
> >> If someone has done several of the following:
> >> - has been involved in an incubating project from start to finish
> >> - has been a release manager
> >> - has assembled LICENSE and NOTICE files
> >> -
41 matches
Mail list logo
