Hi,
> sankeyLayout.js is mainly an improved implementation of the original d3
> sankey layout algorithm. We will add sankeyLayout.js to the list of files
> embed [d3.js](https://github.com/d3/d3) BSD 3-Clause in the LICENSE if
> needed.
Seems like it should be to me. Any modification of code are
Thanks Justin!
> LICENSE is probably missing:
> - MIT licensed sankey layout [1] in [2][3]
> - 2 clause BSD Heatmap layer [4] in [5]
I will try to explain these two concerns about LICENSE.
sankeyLayout.js is mainly an improved implementation of the original d3
sankey layout algorithm. We will
My vote is +1 binding.
But when I check the source file with github repo[1]. I found there are
> some directories are missed.
> I guess we can skip the benchmark, tests, but I'm not sure for the theme
> directory. Can you explain it?
> We need to make sure we can build the full function binary fro
+1 non-binding.
Regards,
Sheng
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 3:00 PM, Moaz Reyad wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The SINGA community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache
> SINGA 1.2.0 (incubating).
>
> The vote thread is at:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/singa-dev/201805.mbox/%3CC
Hi
I just tried to build the source according to the instruction in the mail,
it works.
But when I check the source file with github repo[1]. I found there are
some directories are missed.
I guess we can skip the benchmark, tests, but I'm not sure for the theme
directory. Can you explain it?
We ne
Hi,
+1 binding
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE is probably missing a few things (see below)
- NOTICE is good
- No binary files in release
- All source files have ASF headers
LICENSE is probably missing:
- MIT licensed sankey layout [1] i
Ty. I am +1 binding on rc4
On Wed, May 30, 2018, 13:11 SHUANG SU wrote:
> > When it is released, my point is that the rc4 is removed so some of ypur
> > text says you are releasing 4.1.0rc4. I would have it say release 4.1.0
> > and here is release candidate 4.
>
> Yes, it is the vote for the
In my case the wiki username is the same: javiroman
Best.
--
Javi Roman
Twitter: @javiromanrh
GitHub: github.com/javiroman
Linkedin: es.linkedin.com/in/javiroman
Big Data Blog: dataintensive.info
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 7:40 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> What is your wiki username? It is indepen
What is your wiki username? It is independent of your other ASF accounts
On Wed, May 30, 2018, 7:05 AM Javi Roman wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Could you please help me to get karma to edit:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/June2018
>
> Many thanks!
>
> (javiro...@apache.org)
>
> --
> Javi Roman
>
>
> When it is released, my point is that the rc4 is removed so some of ypur
> text says you are releasing 4.1.0rc4. I would have it say release 4.1.0
> and here is release candidate 4.
Yes, it is the vote for the release of 4.1.0, release candidate 4. I should
have made it clearly
in text.
> That
Thanks all for the comments and discussions!
The voting for the release of Apache ECharts 4.1.0 (release candidate 3) is
closed.
And a new voting for the release of Apache ECharts 4.1.0 (release candidate
4)
has been initialized in another thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/4a551cd183a7e
Hi,
> Firstly, I called a vote for 4.1.0.rc3 on "general@incubator.apache.org",
> and then received some comments.
> Then, I fixed the artifact according to those comments, and called a vote
> for 4.1.0.rc4 on "d...@echarts.apache.org",
> and then the vote passed.
> Then, I am calling a vote for 4
You are likely correct. Just a lot of rcs and I thought you would have
canceled some of the votes.
You don't have to finish the votes if you know you aren't going to release
it. And by an rc4 with a minor change like removing files, you could ask
your group how they feel about the voting process
Hi all!
Could you please help me to get karma to edit:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/June2018
Many thanks!
(javiro...@apache.org)
--
Javi Roman
Twitter: @javiromanrh
GitHub: github.com/javiroman
Linkedin: es.linkedin.com/in/javiroman
Big Data Blog: dataintensive.info
-
Kevin,
Sorry, I am being confused with the voting progress:
Firstly, I called a vote for 4.1.0.rc3 on "general@incubator.apache.org",
and then received some comments.
Then, I fixed the artifact according to those comments, and called a vote
for 4.1.0.rc4 on "d...@echarts.apache.org",
and then the
15 matches
Mail list logo
