+1 (binding)
Verified md5 of the source tarball.
Downloaded source, built successfully, ran a few unit tests.
On 5/21/18, 9:02 PM, "Josh Elser" wrote:
+1 (binding)
Things look good for the most part, a few things I noticed which can be
fixed next release:
* NOTICE nee
+1 (binding)
Things look good for the most part, a few things I noticed which can be
fixed next release:
* NOTICE needs an updated copyright year
* `mvn apache-rat:check` fails on the below files
apache-tephra-0.14.0-incubating/tephra-distribution/licenses/Aopa.PL
apache-tephra-0.14.0-incuba
On Mon, May 21, 2018, 21:12 Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Why does this need to be included at all? Why not just provide a pointer
> to
> > the canonical minified version?
>
> Most common occurrence (off the top of my head) is a minified version of
> bootstrap for project site / documentations
On 21 May 2018 at 23:51, James Taylor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.14.0-incubating,
> release candidate 1. This is the seventh release of Tephra. The Tephra dev
> community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Tephra
> 0.14.0-incubating, re
Hi all,
This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.14.0-incubating,
release candidate 1. This is the seventh release of Tephra. The Tephra dev
community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Tephra
0.14.0-incubating, release candidate 1.
PPMC Vote Call: https://s.apache.org/
+1 (transferring my vote over from dev list vote)
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Ohad Shacham
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> The Apache Omid community has voted on and approved a proposal
> to release Apache Omid 0.9.0.0-incubating.
>
> PPMC Vote Call:http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/omid-dev/
>
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:20 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Quote from Apache Legal FAQ:
> > https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#prohibited
> >
> > "[...] For example, using a GPL'ed tool during the build is OK, however
> > including GPL'ed source code is not.[...]"
> >
> > Apache N
On 21 May 2018 at 21:16, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I don't think there should be anything in the source release that is
>> not in the source repo.
>
> It reasonably common (from my review of 100’s of releases) that the build
> process may modify and/or add some files (e.g config files). I
+1 (binding).
With YARN services in Apache Hadoop 3.1 release, there is a good path forward.
Thanks
+Vind
> On May 20, 2018, at 10:59 AM, Billie Rinaldi wrote:
>
> After a long period of low activity, the Slider PPMC has recently decided
> upon retirement [1]. Please vote on whether we should
Hi,
> Quote from Apache Legal FAQ:
> https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#prohibited
>
> "[...] For example, using a GPL'ed tool during the build is OK, however
> including GPL'ed source code is not.[...]"
>
> Apache Netbeans uses external tools when building and at least GPLv2-
> CP
> co
Hi,
> I don't think there should be anything in the source release that is
> not in the source repo.
It reasonably common (from my review of 100’s of releases) that the build
process may modify and/or add some files (e.g config files). I wouldn’t expect
any code to change or be added.
Thanks,
Hi,
> Why does this need to be included at all? Why not just provide a pointer to
> the canonical minified version?
Most common occurrence (off the top of my head) is a minified version of
bootstrap for project site / documentations. So your view is that that
shouldn’t be included in a source r
Hi,
The Apache Omid community has voted on and approved a proposal
to release Apache Omid 0.9.0.0-incubating.
PPMC Vote
Call:http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/omid-dev/201805.mbox/%3cCAHuxFyOJZ8=ud2xuq2drbgpzznoqpvaunbxpxwyo5gs_xr+...@mail.gmail.com%3e
PPMC Vote Result:
http://mail-ar
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On 20/05/2018 19:59, Billie Rinaldi wrote:
After a long period of low activity, the Slider PPMC has recently decided
upon retirement [1]. Please vote on whether we should retire the Slider
podling. Here is my +1 (binding).
[ ] +1 Retire Slider
[ ] +0 No opinion
[ ] -1 D
+1
On 21 May 2018 at 12:10, Josh Elser wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks for pushing this to completion, Billie!
>
>
> On 5/20/18 1:59 PM, Billie Rinaldi wrote:
>
>> After a long period of low activity, the Slider PPMC has recently decided
>> upon retirement [1]. Please vote on whether we should
+1 (binding)
Thanks for pushing this to completion, Billie!
On 5/20/18 1:59 PM, Billie Rinaldi wrote:
After a long period of low activity, the Slider PPMC has recently decided
upon retirement [1]. Please vote on whether we should retire the Slider
podling. Here is my +1 (binding).
[ ] +1 Retir
On 21 May 2018 at 08:59, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> As I cannot build the binary without doing some changes on the pom file, I
>> had to vote -1 (binding) here.
>
> You don’t need to modify the pom file to compile you can specify
> -Dcheckstyle.skip to compile id check style is acting up for
The following are the version settings in the releasing step:
1. The version in sources and binaries to be such as: 5.0.0-beta
2. The tag in Github to be such as: 5.0.0-beta[RC1]
If the vote accepted then create a new tag named 5.0.0-beta or change the tag
from 5.0.0-beta[RC1] to 5.0.0-beta.
If
Yes, I saw here http://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html that
> .md5's in dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/ must be removed manually.
And I was planning on doing just that after the vote.
I've also wondered why we generate MD5s to begin with... I've added
https://issues.apache.org/j
Mike and Ted, thanks a lot for your detailed explanation!
I've been gradually understanding the way that the community thinks
about the "release". And I will fix the artifact soon.
Thanks,
Shuang
--
Su Shuang (100pah)
--
2018-05-21 14:
On 20 May 2018 at 23:33, Emilian Bold wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Apache NetBeans community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
> Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1.
>
> We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
> incubator release candidate.
>
>
[Resend incuding general@incubator.apache.org]
Hi Ate,
Am Montag, den 21.05.2018, 14:54 +0200 schrieb Ate Douma:
> a) nbbuild/licenses folder still has the GPL license file, which I
> thought/expected no longer should be needed with the fix from
> NETBEANS-305 [1]?
> Is there still a GPL usage l
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 12:52 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Javascript code that is minified or combined in any major way is much
> more
> > like binary code in that respect. It is true that somebody *could*
> inspect
> > the correlation, but it is not true that this inspection is either
>
On Mon, 21 May 2018 15:31:49 +0800, "吴晟 Sheng Wu" wrote:
> I understand in next time, we should add svn revision number. And do
> you suggest we should add checksum in the mail?
Yes, checksums in the vote email can be good as they are easy to
cross-check, say if there is an RC2 vote followed by
I'm inclined to vote positive on this RC1, overall looks great!
- verified the MD5 and SHA1, and PGP signatures with the ASC files.
- executed rat check (ant rat) and verified the report.
- build and run the source (using JDK8), and all seems fine.
However I still have two questions:
a) nbbuild
The Taverna PPMC has voted to release:
Apache Taverna Language 0.16.0-incubating
with +4 PPMC-binding votes. This email is the IPMC vote.
Vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/29405e13efcd3282e978982c2c4c02b1d1bf683460ce618c7248617a@%3Cdev.taverna.apache.org%3E
Result:
https://
We decide to withdraw this release vote, and redo this release. Not only
because we want a better release which honors feedbacks especially from
William and Justin, but also because we need to address one compatibility
issue found recently [1].
Thank you all for your feedback, hopefully we can st
Hi,
> As I cannot build the binary without doing some changes on the pom file, I
> had to vote -1 (binding) here.
You don’t need to modify the pom file to compile you can specify
-Dcheckstyle.skip to compile id check style is acting up for you.
Up to you if you want to vote -1 but I just want t
Hi,
> Javascript code that is minified or combined in any major way is much more
> like binary code in that respect. It is true that somebody *could* inspect
> the correlation, but it is not true that this inspection is either normally
> done or easily done.
Thanks Ted I’ve not thought of it in t
Hi Stian
I appreciate your very detail review for our release. I will move your points
to the GitHub issue under `beta2` for helping the project to provide better
release in next time.
> Remember 72 hours is not a time-out, but a minimum period to wait. :)
Yes. I know. I will be more patien
On Sun, 20 May 2018 17:08:31 +0800, "吴晟 Sheng Wu" wrote:
> Hi, IPMC
> I am asking the release vote, again. :) Haven't had one yet. Hope we can
> have enough vote in 72 hours.
Remember 72 hours is not a time-out, but a minimum period to wait. :)
> Voting will start now (May 18th, 2018) and wil
31 matches
Mail list logo
