+1 (binding)
verified build from source on ubuntu 16.04
Best,
Sebastian
On 08.05.2018 19:36, Anirudh wrote:
Hi all,
This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.0, release
candidate RC2.
Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release.
Vote thread:
https
Hi,
> @Justin - thanks for taking the time to review. Really appreciate it. Looks
> like there's some confusion, though. Prior to starting this vote, you
> approved the change on the JIRA here[1], but now you've -1'ed the release.
AFAICS this is still unanswered:
Not 100% certain but I think tha
Hi,
I would like to clarify more on a wider range.
Dubbo will always trying to follow the ASF release policy as much as possible.
The reason why the group id remains com.alibaba is for compatibility
purpose. It might take some time for Dubbo to to change the group id
as well as package name, we'
Hi,
> Maybe the first release should be Apache for the source with Alibaba making
> the binary release through their current Maven release process.
Which is my understanding of what they are going to do. They were also going to
vote on the binary to check it’s OK but not have that as part of th
Hi -
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 8, 2018, at 5:08 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> But nothing prevents Alibaba from publishing under coordinates that they
>> control.
>>
>> It needs to be clear however that it is alibaba publishing there, not
>> Apache.
>
> The has been discussed on l
Hi,
> But nothing prevents Alibaba from publishing under coordinates that they
> control.
>
> It needs to be clear however that it is alibaba publishing there, not
> Apache.
The has been discussed on list with Dubbo and that’s the approach they are
going to take with their first release. They a
Greg has it all correct.
But nothing prevents Alibaba from publishing under coordinates that they
control.
It needs to be clear however that it is alibaba publishing there, not
Apache.
On Tue, May 8, 2018, 13:56 Greg Stein wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I wanted to send a note that Infra has seen a coup
@Justin - thanks for taking the time to review. Really appreciate it. Looks
like there's some confusion, though. Prior to starting this vote, you
approved the change on the JIRA here[1], but now you've -1'ed the release.
At this point, we're trying to get clarification on OMID-44 so that when we
go
Hi all,
I wanted to send a note that Infra has seen a couple requests from podlings
to publish under third-party Maven groupId coordinates (com.alibaba and
org.netbeans). Unless/until the Foundation owns these domains, we cannot
allow publishing under those coordinates.
Needless to say, we'll nev
Hi all,
This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.0, release
candidate RC2.
Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release.
Vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ddc088a21aac179144350ea97353a7ea885b2765ccb98db08a03ba2d@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%
Looks good to me! +1
2018-05-05 18:39 GMT-07:00 Lionel Liu :
> Copy my vote from dev list
>
> I checked:
>
> signature files: OK
> hash files: OK
> LICENSE: OK for source release, no cat-X dependency, no cat-B bundled
> source.
> NOTICE: OK
> DISCLAIMER: OK
> compile: OK
>
> so +1
>
> Thanks,
> L
11 matches
Mail list logo
