Re: The role of a mentor

I try to be more aware early on and then ease up later after things start moving smoothly. I still watch a lot, however. On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 9:47 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz < bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 6:07 AM, Hen wrote: > > ...If you > > think of someone y

Re: The role of a mentor

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 6:07 AM, Hen wrote: > ...If you > think of someone you view as a mentor, they didn't spend all their time > looking over your shoulder. Instead you met with them from time to time and > discussed a topic that you were looking to find clarity on... That's how I see my role

Re: The role of a mentor

I liked Julian's description too. Yours worries me though - specifically the "but in fact they are reading every thread, watching every process being developed, thinking through every decision. Very occasionally (in an ideal world) they are saying nothing". My first concern is because that's not

Re: [VOTE] Retire the HTrace Podling

Hi Lewis, Feel sorry about HTRACE community has decided to retire. Already involved in discussion in dev@ My +1 no binding Sheng Wu ---Original--- From: "lewis john mcgibbney" Date: Thu, Apr 12, 2018 07:40 AM To: "general"; Cc: "dev"; Subject: [VOTE] Retire the HTrace Podling Hi Folks,

[VOTE] Retire the HTrace Podling

Hi Folks, Please excuse the error on my part, which essentially missed this important stage of VOTE'ing on general@ for official retirement of the HTrace Podling. However, we are here now. The VOTE will be open for a minimum of 72 hours. The previous community VOTE [0] took place on the HTrace dev@

Re: svn commit: r1828932 - in /incubator/public/trunk/content: podlings.xml projects/htrace.xml

Bugger. I missed that line and this is the first time I've initiated the process. Sorry about that folks and thank you John for the correction. I'll kick that thread off now... Damn. On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 4:28 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Lewis, > > In order to retire a podling, a vote must occu

Re: svn commit: r1828932 - in /incubator/public/trunk/content: podlings.xml projects/htrace.xml

Lewis, In order to retire a podling, a vote must occur on general@incubator. https://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html John On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 4:20 PM wrote: > Author: lewismc > Date: Wed Apr 11 20:20:39 2018 > New Revision: 1828932 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1828

Re: Challenges using Gitbox

On 04/11/2018 09:58 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: 3. The mailing list is a bit dated. Totally true. Pony helps a bit: https://lists.apache.org/ But not all that much. Spam shouldn't be much of a problem (it isn't on other lists that I have been part of). Aside from self-inflicted spam like noti

Re: Challenges using Gitbox

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 11:11 AM, Maxime Beauchemin < maximebeauche...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi general@incubator! > > This is an email discussing the challenges we are facing while using Github > / Gitbox for our ASF project and wanted to start a thread to discuss > solutions and ways we can mitiga

Re: Challenges using Gitbox

Hi - > On Apr 11, 2018, at 11:11 AM, Maxime Beauchemin > wrote: > > Hi general@incubator! > > This is an email discussing the challenges we are facing while using Github > / Gitbox for our ASF project and wanted to start a thread to discuss > solutions and ways we can mitigate. > > We're ver

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.1.0-rc3

On 04/11/2018 02:51 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 13:49, Steve Lawrence > wrote: > > The KEYS file was in dist/dev. I've moved it to dist/release, now > available here: > > https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/daffodil/KEYS > > >

Re: Challenges using Gitbox

On 04/11/2018 06:11 PM, Maxime Beauchemin wrote: > 3. The mailing list is a bit dated. I'm saying "a bit" here as an attempt ... > searchable. Something like Google Groups would be a huge step forward here. I'd suggest Groups.IO over Google Groups, if only because one of its features is: "Integra

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.1.0-rc3

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 13:49, Steve Lawrence wrote: > The KEYS file was in dist/dev. I've moved it to dist/release, now > available here: > > https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/daffodil/KEYS Thanks! > > Regarding the BSD-licenses, I don

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.1.0-rc3

The KEYS file was in dist/dev. I've moved it to dist/release, now available here: https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/daffodil/KEYS Regarding the BSD-licenses, I don't believe the RAT CLI can detect BSD licenses, or at least I haven't figured out how to get it to work if it can. I'd love to hea

Challenges using Gitbox

Hi general@incubator! This is an email discussing the challenges we are facing while using Github / Gitbox for our ASF project and wanted to start a thread to discuss solutions and ways we can mitigate. We're very grateful for Gitbox, but here are the challenges we're facing with it: 1. Our PMs

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.1.0-rc3

* Signatures ok * License, disclaimer, notice ok * Rat check ok (using sbt-rat locally, though it doesn't seem to detect some BSD-licensed source files as such) * Builds/tests ok * But there's no KEYS file! This should be at https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/daffodil/KEYS Please add the KEYS f

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Griffin-0.2.0-incubating [RC3]

* Signatures ok * Disclaimer, notice, license ok - As an aside, I like the formatting used in the license file. * Not exactly sure why you distribute the KEYS file with your sources, but it's not a problem. Keys inside the artifact can't be used to verify the artifact. * Rat check ok * Builds/tes

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.2.0-incubating (RC4)

* Signatures ok * License and disclaimer are fine * Notice included, but the copyright year needs to be updated to 2016-2018 * Rat check ok * I got a test failure locally for integration.interpreter.scala.AddExternalJarMagicSpecForIntegration "should be able to load

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.2.0-incubating (RC4)

For the .md5 file, we can simply not publish that file when copying the RC files. Please don't let that prevent you from checking this release! On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 8:41 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: > Here is my binding +1, any volunteers to help review the RC, we need one > more IPMC vote. > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.2.0-incubating (RC4)

Here is my binding +1, any volunteers to help review the RC, we need one more IPMC vote. On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 6:28 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > Please vote to approve the release of Apache Toree 0.2.0-incubating > (RC4). > > The podling dev vote thread: > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@toree