Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Saga (incubating) version 0.1.0

2018-03-25 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 9:41 PM, Mohammad Asif Siddiqui wrote: > Hello All, > > This is a call for vote to release Apache ServiceComb Saga (Incubating) > version 0.1.0 > > Apache ServiceComb (Incubating) Community has voted and approved the release. > > Vote Thread : > https://lists.apache.org/t

Re: [Vote] Release of Apache-Griffin-0.2.0-incubating [RC1]

2018-03-25 Thread Henry Saputra
Hank, I thought the reccomendation was you can include md5 as long as including other hash like sha? - Henry On Thu, Mar 22, 2018, 10:43 PM Henk P. Penning wrote: > On Fri, 23 Mar 2018, Lionel Liu wrote: > > > Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 03:13:24 +0100 > > From: Lionel Liu > > To: general@incubato

Re: [Vote] Release of Apache-Griffin-0.2.0-incubating [RC1]

2018-03-25 Thread William Guo
hi Justin, Thanks for voting. We will take this opportunity to have a session learning the license issue and make sure everyone know the verify process. Thanks, William On behalf of Apache Griffin PPMC On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 8:49 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > -1 for other reasons than

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking (incubating) version5.0.0-alpha(2ndround)

2018-03-25 Thread sebb
On 25 March 2018 at 21:23, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > If it is bundled and under a ALv2 license you can list it in LICENSE if you > want to but it’s not required. The document also says: "However, for completeness it is useful to list the products and their versions, as is done for products

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking (incubating) version5.0.0-alpha(2ndround)

2018-03-25 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, If it is bundled and under a ALv2 license you can list it in LICENSE if you want to but it’s not required. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: ge

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking (incubating) version5.0.0-alpha(2ndround)

2018-03-25 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, > I think this section means: List the apache-2.0 licensed dependency is not > necessary. Correct only bundled things need to be considered. The guiding principle makes that clear. [1] Thanks, Justin 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#guiding-principle

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking (incubating) version5.0.0-alpha(2ndround)

2018-03-25 Thread peng-yongsheng
BUNDLING AN APACHE-2.0-LICENSED DEPENDENCY Assuming once again that that the bundled dependency itself contains no bundled subcomponents under other licenses and thus the ALv2 applies uniformly to all files, there is no need to modify L

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking (incubating) version5.0.0-alpha(2ndround)

2018-03-25 Thread ???? Sheng Wu
When I recheck our release, we are using Apache HTTPComponent, should its license list in our distribution licenses? -- Sheng Wu Apache SkyWalking original creator and PPMC member -- Original -- From: "Matt Sicker"; Date: Sun, Mar 25, 201