I’ve primarily used excludes in rat to exclude files that can’t include a
license header or that does have one but rat doesn’t recognize it (I’ve
seen this problem with a minified version of jquery for example).
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 03:31, 吴晟 Sheng Wu wrote:
> Justin
>
>
> Thanks for helping.
+1 binding
Compiled from source and ran all the unit tests.
LICENSE, NOTICE, ASF headers looks good to me.
Tim
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 5:15 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
>
> I checked:
> - name includes incubating
> - DISCLAIMER exists
> - LICENSE and NOTICE all good
> - No unex
Hi All,
Since there are some issues in this release so we are closing off this vote
thread.
Thanks All for your support.
Regards
Asif
On 2018/03/23 09:16:37, Mohammad Asif Siddiqui wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This is a call for vote to release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis
Justin
Thanks for helping.
Sheng Wu
---Original---
From: "Justin Mclean"
Date: Sat, Mar 24, 2018 16:21 PM
To: "general";
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking (incubating)
version5.0.0-alpha(2nd round)
Hi,
> Right now, I updated our rat exclude config as following, is this allow
Hi,
> Right now, I updated our rat exclude config as following, is this allowed?
Rat is just a tool, so anything is allowed. It’s up to you to check it complies
with ASF policy.
> The concern may about JSON file for our test cases data and frontend/UI
> dependency descriptions, but JSON format
