Hi,
>> IMO, adding license information along with copyrights in NOTICE sounds
>> reasonable because comparing LICENSE with NOTICE is hard when divided
>> while it may be redundant.
>
> In general only LICENSE should contain license information [1] as the NOTICE
> file is informational only [2], (
HI,
+1 binding
I checked:
- incubating in name
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE is OK but missing a license [1][2]
- please update year in NOTICE
- all source files have ASF headers
- no unexpected binary files in release
- Can compile from source
I did get some failing tests btw, I just ran again
Hi,
Coral is a good name !
Does the code belong to Seoul National University ? In that case, in addition of
your ICLA, we would need a SGA (it's not blocker for the project bootstrapping
or code donation, but we, at least, will need it later for graduation). On the
other hand, if the committers a
February 2018 Incubator report timeline:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2018
Wed February 07 -- Podling reports due by end of day
Sun February 11 -- Shepherd reviews due by end of day
Sun February 11 -- Summary due by end of day
Tue February 13 -- Mentor signoff due
Hi,
> IMO, adding license information along with copyrights in NOTICE sounds
> reasonable because comparing LICENSE with NOTICE is hard when divided
> while it may be redundant.
In general only LICENSE should contain license information [1] as the NOTICE
file is informational only [2], (see d. "
On 30 January 2018 at 03:02, Makoto Yui wrote:
> Justin,
>
> 2018-01-30 11:33 GMT+09:00 Justin Mclean :
>> You should be careful following other TLPs as examples and follow the
>> instructions here. [1] If you want some good example that the HTTP project
>> or TomCat are I believe good ones to f
If Coral as our project name is fine, I will start voting in a couple of
days.
Let me know if you have any concern.
Thanks.
-Gon
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 6:17 PM, Byung-Gon Chun wrote:
> Thanks for the comments, JB!
> My replies are inlined below.
>
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 5:52 PM, Jean-Baptis
Thanks for the comments, JB!
My replies are inlined below.
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 5:52 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry to be a little bit late on this.
>
> It's a very interesting proposal. It sounds pretty close to the portability
> layer we want to add in Apache Beam. I would
Hi,
sorry to be a little bit late on this.
It's a very interesting proposal. It sounds pretty close to the portability
layer we want to add in Apache Beam. I would love to see interaction between the
two communities.
I have two minor questions:
1. about the name: Onyx sounds very generic and th
