Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.0.0 release RC1

2017-12-01 Thread Meghna Baijal
Henri, I added your comments related to notice and licensing to the same issue here - https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/8913 and created a separate issue to track the submodules here - https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/8920. Thanks, Meghna Baijal On Fri, Dec 1, 2017

MXNet External Sources (was Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.0.0 release RC1)

2017-12-01 Thread John D. Ament
One question about the below. We've noted that much of the source code for MXNet is coming from the external DMLC repos. Are there plans to move those repos into the ASF? John On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 7:13 PM Hen wrote: > +1. > > Items I note should happen post release are: > > * Move the vario

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.0.0 release RC1

2017-12-01 Thread Hen
+1. Items I note should happen post release are: * Move the various git submodules into third-party/ or similar so it's simpler to see what is Apache original source when we review a release. * Deal with the Copyright statements in perl-package (copyright holder has approved doing this) * Lots of

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.0.0 release RC1

2017-12-01 Thread John D. Ament
+1 On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 7:45 PM Chris Olivier wrote: > Hello All, > > > This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.0.0, release > candidate 1. > > > Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release. > > > *Vote thread:* > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/568bf0c99

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.0.0 release RC1

2017-12-01 Thread Meghna Baijal
Hello Justin, Thank you for your vote. I have created a Github issue to track all your comments here - https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/8913 I will make sure all these issues are fixed soon after the 1.0.0 release. Thanks, Meghna Baijal On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 11:59 PM, Sebastian

Re: Podling user@ lists (was: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation)

2017-12-01 Thread Daniel Dekany
Friday, December 1, 2017, 9:03:31 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Mike Jumper wrote: >> ...Gaining >> experience conducting non-development user support/discussion via >> mailing lists was important, and seems to me to be exactly the sort of >> thing that should b

Re: Podling user@ lists (was: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation)

2017-12-01 Thread John D. Ament
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 3:36 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > On Dec 1, 2017, at 12:03 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz < > bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Mike Jumper > wrote: > > ...Gaining > experience conducting non-development user support/discussion via > mailing lists

Re: Podling user@ lists (was: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation)

2017-12-01 Thread Dave Fisher
> On Dec 1, 2017, at 12:03 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Mike Jumper wrote: >> ...Gaining >> experience conducting non-development user support/discussion via >> mailing lists was important, and seems to me to be exactly the sort of >> thing that should b

Re: Podling user@ lists (was: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation)

2017-12-01 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Mike Jumper wrote: > ...Gaining > experience conducting non-development user support/discussion via > mailing lists was important, and seems to me to be exactly the sort of > thing that should be done prior to graduation, not after What we've seen is that some

Re: Podling user@ lists (was: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation)

2017-12-01 Thread Mike Jumper
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 11:11 AM, sebb wrote: > On 1 December 2017 at 18:57, Mike Jumper wrote: >>... >> >> Speaking as a member of a recently-graduated podling that joined the >> Incubator with an established user base, I think we would not have >> done as well without a user@ list. > > So how di

Re: Podling user@ lists (was: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation)

2017-12-01 Thread sebb
On 1 December 2017 at 18:57, Mike Jumper wrote: > On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 10:06 AM, sebb wrote: >> On 1 December 2017 at 13:52, John D. Ament wrote: >> > ... >> > >> > At the same time, if we're saying we want to limit the creation of user@ >> > lists, if a podling is already established and usin

Re: Podling user@ lists (was: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation)

2017-12-01 Thread Mike Jumper
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 10:06 AM, sebb wrote: > On 1 December 2017 at 13:52, John D. Ament wrote: > > ... > > > > At the same time, if we're saying we want to limit the creation of user@ > > lists, if a podling is already established and using forums, discourse, > > slack, google groups, etc, do w

Re: Podling user@ lists (was: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation)

2017-12-01 Thread sebb
On 1 December 2017 at 13:52, John D. Ament wrote: > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 7:54 AM Greg Stein wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 3:51 AM, sebb wrote: >> >> > On 29 November 2017 at 13:44, John D. Ament >> wrote: >> > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 5:59 AM sebb wrote: >> > > >> > >> Top posting >>

Re: Podling user@ lists (was: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation)

2017-12-01 Thread John D. Ament
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 7:54 AM Greg Stein wrote: > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 3:51 AM, sebb wrote: > > > On 29 November 2017 at 13:44, John D. Ament > wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 5:59 AM sebb wrote: > > > > > >> Top posting > > >> > > >> The proposal includes a user@ mailing list. > > >