On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I don't have a vote here, but I"m now confused about what problem is being
> solved
As Craig indicates, the goal is to reject ambigous grants, which
require interpretation to figure out what's actually being granted.
-Bertrand
Hi Craig,
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Craig Russell wrote:
> ...I do not intend to accept any more such overly ambiguous grants
Ok, so you think this vote is not needed?
That's fine with me as long as we have a mechanism to avoid ambiguous
grants in the future.
As our secretary I think
Awesome! Good job guys
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017, 2:00 PM Raymundo Panduro wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The Apache Spot (Incubating) Team is proud to announce the release of
> Apache Spot 1.0-incubating.
>
>
> This is the first official Spot Release after entering the Apache
> Incubator.
>
>
> Apache Spot
Hello incubator PMCs,
The Apache Mnemonic community PPMCs and developers have voted and approved
the proposal to release Apache Mnemonic 0.9.0 (incubating).
Apache Mnemonic is an advanced hybrid memory storage oriented library, it's
proposed a non-volatile/durable Java object model and
durable com
Hi All,
The Apache Spot (Incubating) Team is proud to announce the release of
Apache Spot 1.0-incubating.
This is the first official Spot Release after entering the Apache Incubator.
Apache Spot (Incubating) leverages insights from flow and packet
analysis. It helps enterprises and service pro
-1 for an overly broad restriction that needs a bit of discretion.
The situation that caused this issue to be raised is that a grant was made of a
specific set of files contained in a .zip archive. That set of files contained
no non-donated IP. The issue is that the grant had a list of excluded
I don't have a vote here, but I"m now confused about what problem is being
solved. Is it, as Stian says, that an entity is being lazy and did not
attempt to review the contents of the grant before donating? I thought
the goal is to just keep folks from bothering us with additional language
on the
+1
On 07.09.2017 10:32, Ted Dunning wrote:
+1
On Sep 7, 2017 10:11, "Jacques Le Roux"
wrote:
+1 (not binding, not part of IPMC)
Jacques
Le 07/09/2017 à 10:07, Bertrand Delacretaz a écrit :
Hi Incubator PMC.
We recently received a software grant pointing to an archive file for
the code
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 12:07 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> ...Considering that the IPMC is not the one who accepts software grants, what
> is your goal here?...
Grants are received and accepted by the ASF's secretary, right? Or
what do you have in mind?
Anyway, the Incubator PMC can make a recommen
Bertrand,
Considering that the IPMC is not the one who accepts software grants, what
is your goal here?
John
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 4:08 AM Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi Incubator PMC.
>
> We recently received a software grant pointing to an archive file for
> the code donation, but mentioni
+1 (binding)
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 07.09.2017 um 10:07 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz :
>
> Hi Incubator PMC.
>
> We recently received a software grant pointing to an archive file for
> the code donation, but mentioning that some material contained in that
> archive might not be donated.
>
> This
+1
However it should be OK (and perhaps even encouraged) for the archive
to list in NOTICE or similar that some of the files are not legally
owned by the donating entity, for instance other open source files
that have been used – legally they can’t be part of the IP grant
(unless the donating ent
OK, I ll try to fix.
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 8:57 PM John D. Ament wrote:
> Yuri,
>
> Can you fix the report? Looks like you created a bunch of conflicts.
>
> John
>
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 1:47 PM Apache Wiki wrote:
>
> > Dear Wiki user,
> >
> > You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki categ
+1
On Sep 7, 2017 10:11, "Jacques Le Roux"
wrote:
> +1 (not binding, not part of IPMC)
>
> Jacques
>
>
> Le 07/09/2017 à 10:07, Bertrand Delacretaz a écrit :
>
>> Hi Incubator PMC.
>>
>> We recently received a software grant pointing to an archive file for
>> the code donation, but mentioning t
+1 (not binding, not part of IPMC)
Jacques
Le 07/09/2017 à 10:07, Bertrand Delacretaz a écrit :
Hi Incubator PMC.
We recently received a software grant pointing to an archive file for
the code donation, but mentioning that some material contained in that
archive might not be donated.
This wa
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> ...Have people seen similar cases before...
That doesn't look to be the case and I've just started a VOTE here to
reject such grants in the future.
-Bertrand
-
To un
Hi Incubator PMC.
We recently received a software grant pointing to an archive file for
the code donation, but mentioning that some material contained in that
archive might not be donated.
This was discussed on the PMC private list and it looks like we have
consensus for rejecting such grants in
17 matches
Mail list logo
