Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache RocketMQ from podling to TLP

2017-08-24 Thread yukon
Hi Dave, We have noticed that, and provided a method to report security issues in RocketMQ website[1], also updated QU30, thanks for your reminding. [1]. http://rocketmq.apache.org/about/contact/#Security Issues Tracking [2]. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ROCKETMQ/Maturity+Evaluatio

Re: [VOTE] Release Livy 0.4.0-incubating based on Livy 0.4.0 RC2

2017-08-24 Thread Bikas Saha
+1 (binding) Built from source and ran some local tests manually. Spot checked a few random files for license and attribution. Bikas From: Marcelo Vanzin Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 9:04:46 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: d...@livy.incubator.apa

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache RocketMQ from podling to TLP

2017-08-24 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 1:06 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > ...please understand that the Apache Maturity Model is something that > helps the com dev team evaluate TLPs against. Its relevance to a > graduating podling is extremely small... FWIW, I disagree...I think the maturity model is a great too

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache RocketMQ from podling to TLP

2017-08-24 Thread Dave Fisher
Hi - Comdev recently updated QU30 to make sure that security issues are handled on a secure and private basis. The PPMC needs to change the answer to QU30 as JIRA is not a secure process. Regards, Dave > On Aug 24, 2017, at 4:00 AM, Von Gosling wrote: > > Hi, > > Of course, we have listed o

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache RocketMQ from podling to TLP

2017-08-24 Thread Von Gosling
Hi John, Thanks for you explanation for AMM, I would like to complement an individual -> company mapping in our ME[1]. As for security aspect, not just for assessment, we would like to establish private channel in the website later :-) [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ROCKETMQ/

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache RocketMQ from podling to TLP

2017-08-24 Thread John D. Ament
Also please understand that the Apache Maturity Model is something that helps the com dev team evaluate TLPs against. Its relevance to a graduating podling is extremely small. Also, if you want to discuss the AMM a bit, you have a bug in the security assessment that some other projects have hit a

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache RocketMQ from podling to TLP

2017-08-24 Thread John D. Ament
Hi, Could be that you have listed companies people work at. However, I'm looking for more of an individual -> company mapping. John On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 7:00 AM Von Gosling wrote: > Hi, > > Of course, we have listed our committer and PMC make-up in evaluation > list[1] :-) > > > [1] > http

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache RocketMQ from podling to TLP

2017-08-24 Thread Von Gosling
Hi, Of course, we have listed our committer and PMC make-up in evaluation list[1] :-) [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ROCKETMQ/Maturity+Evaluation Best Regards, Von Gosling > 在 2017年8月24日,18:55,John D

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache RocketMQ from podling to TLP

2017-08-24 Thread John D. Ament
Hi, Would you be able to talk about committer and PMC diversity a bit? When RocketMQ came to the incubator, most of the developers were from Alibaba. Please compare to [1] and let us know the affiliations of the prospective PMC members. [1]: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/RocketMQProposal On