Thanks guys!
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> general@ is just fine...
>
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 1:47 AM, Harrison & Wells >
> wrote:
>
> > Guys, I need your help.If I wanted to send a proposal to the incubator
> > committee, whom do I send it to? The general mailing list
Hi,
> Guys, I need your help.If I wanted to send a proposal to the incubator
> committee, whom do I send it to? The general mailing list?
The general mailing list is fine but it probably best to tell us about your
project first before coming up with a more formal proposal.
For instance do you h
general@ is just fine...
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 1:47 AM, Harrison & Wells
wrote:
> Guys, I need your help.If I wanted to send a proposal to the incubator
> committee, whom do I send it to? The general mailing list?Or is there a
> special one?It's quite confusing.
> Thanks!
>
Guys, I need your help.If I wanted to send a proposal to the incubator
committee, whom do I send it to? The general mailing list?Or is there a
special one?It's quite confusing.
Thanks!
Thanks, Kasper.
William
From: Kasper Sørensen
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 12:06:13 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: d...@griffin.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Griffin-0.1.5-incubating [rc3]
+1 (binding)
Cheers, Kasper
2017
+1 (binding)
Cheers, Kasper
2017-07-13 23:36 GMT-07:00 William Guo :
> +1 from myself, non-binding.
>
>
> From: Henry Saputra
> Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 6:21:03 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: d...@griffin.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE
On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 7:34 PM sebb wrote:
> On 16 July 2017 at 23:25, John D. Ament wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 5:32 PM sebb wrote:
> >
> >> On 16 July 2017 at 21:22, John D. Ament wrote:
> >> > Sebb,
> >> >
> >> > I have no particular issue with including the file, and I'm not sure
>
On 17 July 2017 at 00:34, sebb wrote:
> On 16 July 2017 at 23:25, John D. Ament wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 5:32 PM sebb wrote:
>>
>>> On 16 July 2017 at 21:22, John D. Ament wrote:
>>> > Sebb,
>>> >
>>> > I have no particular issue with including the file, and I'm not sure why
>>> > you
On 16 July 2017 at 23:25, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 5:32 PM sebb wrote:
>
>> On 16 July 2017 at 21:22, John D. Ament wrote:
>> > Sebb,
>> >
>> > I have no particular issue with including the file, and I'm not sure why
>> > you think I or anyone else would. This is not the c
+1 (binding)
On July 13, 2017 at 2:40:37 PM, Ran Ziv (r...@gigaspaces.com) wrote:
Copying my non-binding +1 from the dev list as well.
-
Regarding not sending the vote to both general@ and dev@ - right, makes
sense. Sorry about that.
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 9:14 PM, Maxim Orlov wrote
On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 5:32 PM sebb wrote:
> On 16 July 2017 at 21:22, John D. Ament wrote:
> > Sebb,
> >
> > I have no particular issue with including the file, and I'm not sure why
> > you think I or anyone else would. This is not the canonical path for
> > podlings.xml though, and may be ou
Dear all,
The Apache Tamaya team would like to release version 0.3-incubating of
Apache Tamaya Extensions.
The new release of our extensions as it uses the new 0.3 release of
Apache Tamya API&Core.
The source distribution has been deployed to [1] and the Maven artefacts
are available at [2].
On 16 July 2017 at 21:22, John D. Ament wrote:
> Sebb,
>
> I have no particular issue with including the file, and I'm not sure why
> you think I or anyone else would. This is not the canonical path for
> podlings.xml though, and may be out of date. My recommendation is to do a
> 302 to the righ
Sebb,
I have no particular issue with including the file, and I'm not sure why
you think I or anyone else would. This is not the canonical path for
podlings.xml though, and may be out of date. My recommendation is to do a
302 to the right location, so that consumers are always getting the latest
No. Thanks.
So we have some outdated links on apache.org. Not sure where I have
found the previous link.
Oliver
Am 16.07.17 um 21:15 schrieb John D. Ament:
Did you try lists.apache.org ?
John
On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 2:57 PM Oliver B. Fischer
wrote:
Hi,
is the archive of our mailing li
Did you try lists.apache.org ?
John
On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 2:57 PM Oliver B. Fischer
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is the archive of our mailing lists down?
> (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/) I get only a while page.
>
> Does anyone knows more?
>
> Oliver
>
>
> --
> N Oliver B. Fischer
> A Schön
Hi,
is the archive of our mailing lists down?
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/) I get only a while page.
Does anyone knows more?
Oliver
--
N Oliver B. Fischer
A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
P +49 30 44793251
M +49 178 7903538
E o.b.fisc...@swe-blog.net
S
On 16 July 2017 at 11:47, John D. Ament wrote:
> Each of those services should be reading the file from SVN locations, e.g.
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings.xml
Perhaps they should, but the fact is that the URL
http://incubator.apache.org/podlings.xml
us
Each of those services should be reading the file from SVN locations, e.g.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings.xml
You can see it being done correctly in whimsy here:
https://github.com/apache/whimsy/blob/ed8acc34dff71ef811b2e11312866c2d1f971b67/www/incubator/mo
Looks like the following diff would sort this:
diff --git a/build_site.sh b/build_site.sh
index af56ce2..adc4d68 100755
--- a/build_site.sh
+++ b/build_site.sh
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ svn co $SVN_REPO $SVN_CO_DIR
mv $SVN_BUILD_DIR/ip-clearance $WORKDIR
mv $SVN_BUILD_DIR/projects $WORKDIR
The podlings.xml file used to be available from
http://incubator.apache.org/podlings.xml
Also the related .dtd and .xsl were there.
These URLs need to be restored as 3rd parties (such as Whimsy) use them.
On 13 July 2017 at 02:50, John D. Ament wrote:
> All,
>
> The website has been migrated.
21 matches
Mail list logo
