Re: [VOTE] Recommend Apache Fluo graduation as TLP to Board

2017-07-11 Thread John D. Ament
+1 On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 4:44 PM Christopher wrote: > Hello IPMC, > > The recent DISCUSS thread on the topic of Fluo's graduation has been open > for at least 72 hours, and I believe all questions have been answered and > issues addressed at this point. > > With the discussion having settled d

Re: [VOTE] Recommend Apache Fluo graduation as TLP to Board

2017-07-11 Thread Billie Rinaldi
+1 (binding) On 7/10/17 4:44 PM, Christopher wrote: > Hello IPMC, > > The recent DISCUSS thread on the topic of Fluo's graduation has been open > for at least 72 hours, and I believe all questions have been answered and > issues addressed at this point. > > With the discussion having settled down

Re: [DISCUSS] Fluo graduation as TLP

2017-07-11 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Mike Walch wrote: > ...Below is a link to our the most commented issues from all Fluo repositories > to give you examples of our work flow:.. Thanks! https://github.com/apache/incubator-fluo/issues/230 is a nice example...which in the end looks very much like a m

Re: [DISCUSS] Fluo graduation as TLP

2017-07-11 Thread Mike Walch
> Code reviews happens after the fact but sometimes a wild idea needs to be discussed and fleshed out for a while before code can be written. > Could you provide an example of such a discussion? Links to the relevant messages are good enough, just to understand how/where things happen. Developers

Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release

2017-07-11 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Also, please note that I did not cast a vote on this release. I agreed > with Roman's sentiments on needed proper NOTICE/LICENSE/DISCLAIMER for the > RPMs, but did not get a chance to review the release contents. Ah sorry I missed that as well, but the vote still passes with 3 +1 votes. T

Re: Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release

2017-07-11 Thread John D. Ament
Also, please note that I did not cast a vote on this release. I agreed with Roman's sentiments on needed proper NOTICE/LICENSE/DISCLAIMER for the RPMs, but did not get a chance to review the release contents. John On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 3:48 AM Ruilong Huo wrote: > Thanks Julian for the clari

Re:Re: [VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release

2017-07-11 Thread HuoRuilong
Thanks Alan! Best regards, Ruilong Huo At 2017-07-11 06:29:00, "Alan Gates" wrote: >Forwarding my +1 from the dev list. > >Alan. > >On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Ruilong Huo wrote: > >> Hi IPMC member, >> >> >> The PPMC vote for the Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating release has passed. >> We kin

Re:Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release

2017-07-11 Thread Ruilong Huo
Thanks Julian for the clarification! Checked that: 1) Roman Shaposhnik; 2) John D. Ament; 3) Justin Mclean; 4) Alan Gates, are all PMC member of incubator. I have sent another email with their IPMC vote as binding vote for Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating release. Best regards, Ruilong Huo At

Re: [DISCUSS] Fluo graduation as TLP

2017-07-11 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi, On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 4:29 PM, Christopher wrote: > ...As a project which was born and raised on GitHub, Fluo makes very heavy use > of the issue tracker for day to day decision making and asyncronous > discussions, using GitHub issues and pull requests Ok, thanks for explaining. > ..