+1. I concur, though I feel a bit saddened that it work out.
Best regards,
Pierre
On Sunday, June 18, 2017, Luciano Resende wrote:
> +1 for retirement
>
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 6:30 PM, John D. Ament >
> wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > This is a call to vote to retire the Blur podling. Blur has
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Raphael Bircher >
> wrote:
>
> > Jenkins maybe, but the idea for me is to make it easy for contributors
> >> to run the website generation locally for creating content.
> >>
> > For my point of view, an automa
I would love to contribute.
On Jun 22, 2017 8:05 AM, "John D. Ament" wrote:
> All,
>
> There's an ongoing discussion on the ActiveMQ dev list [1] to spin up a
> project focused on core, reusable messaging components. The feeling is
> that this is outside the realm of ActiveMQ for various reason
All,
There's an ongoing discussion on the ActiveMQ dev list [1] to spin up a
project focused on core, reusable messaging components. The feeling is
that this is outside the realm of ActiveMQ for various reasons and could be
leveraged by various messaging platforms, potentially even building out
s
Awesome! It's always nice seeing how projects grow between IPMC votes :)
On 6/21/17 1:09 PM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) wrote:
+1, great feedback. We will get this sorted very soon!
debo
On 6/21/17, 10:07 AM, "Wang, Gang1" wrote:
Hi Josh,
Thank you for the review and suggestion, Ye
Hello Incubator PMC,
The Apache Traffic Control community has voted on and approved a proposal
to release Apache Traffic Control 2.0.0. We now kindly request that the
Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release.
Changes since 1.8.1:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-traffi
+1, great feedback. We will get this sorted very soon!
debo
On 6/21/17, 10:07 AM, "Wang, Gang1" wrote:
Hi Josh,
Thank you for the review and suggestion, Yes it makes sense to construct a
set of pure Java memory services as fallback for the experience of first users.
we would add
Hi Josh,
Thank you for the review and suggestion, Yes it makes sense to construct a set
of pure Java memory services as fallback for the experience of first users. we
would add this feature to Mnemonic later, Thanks!
Best Regards
Gary
(323)801-6286 (WhatsApp)
-Original Message-
From: