Re: ASF hosted binaries collecting user data without an explicit opt-in

On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 7:15 AM, Greg Stein wrote: >... Do no evil... Of course. As long as everybody agrees on the definition of "evil" ;-) Hence my proposal to briefly document best practices about how to collect user data in a non-evil way. Maybe adding a few notes to https://issues.apache.or

Re: ASF hosted binaries collecting user data without an explicit opt-in

Hi Roman, Greg, * Am .06.2017, 07:20 Uhr, schrieb Roman Shaposhnik : On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 10:15 PM, Greg Stein wrote: I recall a company that started to list out each of things NOT to do. Item after item after item, to develop a policy. After a few dozen such, one guy piped up, "this is

Re: ASF hosted binaries collecting user data without an explicit opt-in

Haha... I'm no Director any more. Such policy is above my pay grade :-P On Jun 8, 2017 22:20, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote: On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 10:15 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > I recall a company that started to list out each of things NOT to do. Item > after item after item, to develop a policy. A

Re: ASF hosted binaries collecting user data without an explicit opt-in

On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 10:15 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > I recall a company that started to list out each of things NOT to do. Item > after item after item, to develop a policy. After a few dozen such, one guy > piped up, "this is ridiculous" ... It just isn't tractable. So he suggested > a simple rep

Re: ASF hosted binaries collecting user data without an explicit opt-in

I recall a company that started to list out each of things NOT to do. Item after item after item, to develop a policy. After a few dozen such, one guy piped up, "this is ridiculous" ... It just isn't tractable. So he suggested a simple replacement: Do no evil. On Jun 8, 2017 21:13, "Roman Shapos

Re: ASF hosted binaries collecting user data without an explicit opt-in

On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: >> ...Who owns release policy? I presume it's VP Legal, which would suggest >> legal-discuss... > > I don't think our release policy is relevant here. Actually, that's what I'm tryin

Re: [VOTE] Merge DistributedLog as the subproject of Apache BookKeeper

On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 8:50 PM Sijie Guo wrote: > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 5:47 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 8:44 PM Sijie Guo wrote: > > > > > Sure. > > > > > > The discussion email thread between BookKeeper PMC and DistributedLog > > PPMC: > > > > > > https://mail-sea

Re: [VOTE] Merge DistributedLog as the subproject of Apache BookKeeper

On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 5:47 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 8:44 PM Sijie Guo wrote: > > > Sure. > > > > The discussion email thread between BookKeeper PMC and DistributedLog > PPMC: > > > > https://mail-search.apache.org/pmc/private-arch/ > bookkeeper-private/201706.mbox/%3CCA

Re: [VOTE] Merge DistributedLog as the subproject of Apache BookKeeper

On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 8:44 PM Sijie Guo wrote: > Sure. > > The discussion email thread between BookKeeper PMC and DistributedLog PPMC: > > https://mail-search.apache.org/pmc/private-arch/bookkeeper-private/201706.mbox/%3ccao2ydyzu+r1eaepyhzufxe_w0qakhnyxnnmn5+zx6q520uz...@mail.gmail.com%3E > > T

Re: [VOTE] Merge DistributedLog as the subproject of Apache BookKeeper

Sure. The discussion email thread between BookKeeper PMC and DistributedLog PPMC: https://mail-search.apache.org/pmc/private-arch/bookkeeper-private/201706.mbox/%3ccao2ydyzu+r1eaepyhzufxe_w0qakhnyxnnmn5+zx6q520uz...@mail.gmail.com%3E The BookKeeper PMC VOTE email thread (it is still ongoing): htt

Re: [VOTE] Merge DistributedLog as the subproject of Apache BookKeeper

Sije, Can you provide links to the PPMC and PMC votes going on for this move? John On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 8:21 PM Sijie Guo wrote: > ( /cc bookkeeper dev@ and incubator general@ for awareness ) > > Hi all, > > There was a joint discussion between BookKeeper PMC and DistributedLog PPMC > about

[VOTE] Merge DistributedLog as the subproject of Apache BookKeeper

( /cc bookkeeper dev@ and incubator general@ for awareness ) Hi all, There was a joint discussion between BookKeeper PMC and DistributedLog PPMC about moving the development of DistributedLog as part of Apache BookKeeper. The reasons behind it are: First, DistributedLog is born as an extension t

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Atlas Project from Incubator

Hi sebb, Have removed 0.7.1-incubating as well since there are no future releases planned on this release line. Thanks Suma On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 3:31 AM, sebb wrote: > On 8 June 2017 at 01:03, Suma Shivaprasad > wrote: > > Sebb, > > > > The 0.8-incubating has major product updates and there

[VOTE] Impala 2.9.0 release candidate 1

Impala 2.9.0 release candidate 1 has passed a PPMC vote; this email is a call for an IPMC vote. The PPMC vote thread is: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f913ab0376f997fedd9a018715ce4b 3e88da67226e26751ea0e1f105@%3Cdev.impala.apache.org%3E http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/impala-dev/20

Re: Editing reports page

Done. On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 5:01 PM Ryan Blue wrote: > Can someone grant me permission to edit the incubator reports? I'd like to > submit one for Toree but I don't have permission. My user is RyanBlue. > Thanks! > > -- > Ryan Blue >

Editing reports page

Can someone grant me permission to edit the incubator reports? I'd like to submit one for Toree but I don't have permission. My user is RyanBlue. Thanks! -- Ryan Blue

Re: subsribribe

Please send this to general-subscr...@incubator.apache.org On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Taras Bobrovytsky wrote: > >

subsribribe

[PROPOSAL] Heron

Dear Apache Incubator Community, We are excited to share our proposal for discussion and feedback for entering Apache Incubation. Heron is a real-time, distributed, fault-tolerant stream processing engine. Our proposal can be found at https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/HeronProposal and is includ

Re: ASF hosted binaries collecting user data without an explicit opt-in

Out of curiousity: Do we ever let domains like this expire? Greets, Myrle On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote: > Makes sense to me. > > Cheers, > Chris > > > > > On 6/8/17, 1:42 AM, "Greg Stein" wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 3:10 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz < > bdelacr

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - Container Service

+1 On 8 June 2017 at 16:49, Richard Downer wrote: > Apache Brooklyn is receiving a code for the "Container Service", an > extension to Brooklyn which the authors and the Brooklyn PMC would like to > integrate into the Brooklyn project. > > See http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/brooklyn- >

Re: ASF hosted binaries collecting user data without an explicit opt-in

Makes sense to me. Cheers, Chris On 6/8/17, 1:42 AM, "Greg Stein" wrote: On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 3:10 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz < bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Raphael Bircher > wrote: > > Am .06.2017, 09:43 Uhr, schrieb Bertrand

[IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - Container Service

Apache Brooklyn is receiving a code for the "Container Service", an extension to Brooklyn which the authors and the Brooklyn PMC would like to integrate into the Brooklyn project. See http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/brooklyn-container-service.html Please vote to approve this contribution

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Atlas Project from Incubator

+1 (binding) Regards JB On 06/06/2017 10:06 PM, Suma Shivaprasad wrote: Dear Incubator members, Following the discussion in Atlas community on graduating Apache Atlas from incubation to a Top Level Project, starting this voting thread within the incubator community. Apache Atlas entered into i

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Atlas Project from Incubator

On 8 June 2017 at 01:03, Suma Shivaprasad wrote: > Sebb, > > The 0.8-incubating has major product updates and there are users still > using 0.7 major release. We need to provide the latest maint version and > upgrade path for the 0.7 release. Are there going to be any more 0.7.x releases? It doe

Re: ASF hosted binaries collecting user data without an explicit opt-in

On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 3:10 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz < bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Raphael Bircher > wrote: > > Am .06.2017, 09:43 Uhr, schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz > > : > >> ...Am I missing something? > > > > Yea, as far as I know it is in a old version w

[RESULT][VOTE]: Apache Weex-incubating Release 0.12.0-RC5

Hi IMPC, With 3 +1 and no -1, the vote has passed. Thanks to Raphael Bircher, John D. Ament and Josh Elser. It's our very first release which is meaning a lot to us. Thanks to people in previous vote thread too. -- Best Regards! sospartan http://weex.apache.org/

Re: ASF hosted binaries collecting user data without an explicit opt-in

On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote: > Am .06.2017, 09:43 Uhr, schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz > : >> ...Am I missing something? > > Yea, as far as I know it is in a old version who is in the archive, right. I > think this makes some difference... Ah yes you're right, we might want

Re: ASF hosted binaries collecting user data without an explicit opt-in

Hi all, Am .06.2017, 09:43 Uhr, schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz : On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: ...Who owns release policy? I presume it's VP Legal, which would suggest legal-discuss... I don't think our release policy is relevant here. The issue is a project releasing

Re: ASF hosted binaries collecting user data without an explicit opt-in

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: > ...Who owns release policy? I presume it's VP Legal, which would suggest > legal-discuss... I don't think our release policy is relevant here. The issue is a project releasing software that a) collects user data without an explicit opt-in, an