Re: Images in source code.

Hi James, Everything that is not explicitly called out in the top level NOTICE and LICENSE files are licensed under the Apache 2.0 license. Adding a file to this directory might mislead people into thinking that they need to perform more due diligence with other files in other directories. My

Request for write access to Apache Incubator Wiki

Hi, I just volunteered to be a mentor for the Apache Slider incubator project. Please grant me write access to Apache Incubator Wiki. My apache ID is vinodkv and my wiki user-name VinodKumarVavilapalli (old account but mysteriously dele

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Mynewt from podling to TLP

On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 2:37 PM, aditi hilbert wrote: > > On Jun 3, 2017, at 1:37 AM, sebb wrote: > >... > > Please also remove the non-current releases. > > The links to the source? or all reference altogether? Some orgs are still > working with 0.9 version, for example. > The tarballs in dist

Re: Images in source code.

Agreed. If I wasn't clear the first time, I did not mean to suggest to add a file named LICENSE* in the same directory as the images. This would be confusing for the reason Ted also mentioned. I concur with his suggestion of "README" :) On 6/2/17 6:16 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: I think a README

Re: Images in source code.

I think a README would be a better name for the explanatory file. On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 11:20 PM, James Bognar wrote: > Thanks! > > I haven't found a metadata editor that works yet, so I'll just add a > LICENSE.txt file to the directory. Hopefully that's enough. > > On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 4:

Re: Images in source code.

On 02/06/2017 22:20, James Bognar wrote: > Thanks! > > I haven't found a metadata editor that works yet, so I'll just add a > LICENSE.txt file to the directory. Hopefully that's enough. That is more than is necessary. It might even cause confusion at some point in the future. I would recommend a

Re: Images in source code.

Thanks! I haven't found a metadata editor that works yet, so I'll just add a LICENSE.txt file to the directory. Hopefully that's enough. On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > On 6/2/17 1:15 PM, James Bognar wrote: > >> I just added several png files to the source tree of our podl

Re: Images in source code.

On 6/2/17 1:15 PM, James Bognar wrote: I just added several png files to the source tree of our podling. I created them myself. Are there any best-practices on how to mark these as Apache licensed? I'm not sure of a good way to track this. I'm not sure if png supports arbitrary metadata whi

[VOTE] Apache HTrace 4.3.0 incubating release (rc3)

Hi IPMC, Please consider the release of Apache HTrace 4.3.0 Incubating Project [VOTE]: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6e60ba2574a853da59c3a150f18cd9bbd52051785380a7cc837b583e@%3Cdev.htrace.apache.org%3E Project [RESULT][VOTE]: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/fb2a68fcd9c80d9db4a483

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Mynewt from podling to TLP

> On Jun 3, 2017, at 1:37 AM, sebb wrote: > > On 2 June 2017 at 17:10, aditi hilbert wrote: >> Sebb, >> >> Thanks for catching the errors! Not sure what happened exactly but parts of >> the text reverted back to another resolution we were using as a base >> template. We have fixed the projec

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Mynewt from podling to TLP

On 2 June 2017 at 17:10, aditi hilbert wrote: > Sebb, > > Thanks for catching the errors! Not sure what happened exactly but parts of > the text reverted back to another resolution we were using as a base > template. We have fixed the project description: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/d

Images in source code.

I just added several png files to the source tree of our podling. I created them myself. Are there any best-practices on how to mark these as Apache licensed?

Re: [VOTE] - Approve the release of Apache Joshua incubating 6.1 (rc4)

Hi Justin, Excellent catch. Thank you for rebiewing the RC... it is really helping us out. To answer your question, I had to look back to the Joshua Tag for 6.0.4 (prior to it's entry into the Incubator as a podling) I managed to find the commit history for the file(s) in question... https://github

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Mynewt from podling to TLP

Sebb, Thanks for catching the errors! Not sure what happened exactly but parts of the text reverted back to another resolution we were using as a base template. We have fixed the project description: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MYNEWT/Resolution

Re: [VOTE] Livy to enter Apache Incubator

+1 On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 11:14 AM Hitesh Shah wrote: > +1 > > -- Hitesh > > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 6:03 AM, Sean Busbey wrote: > > > Hi folks! > > > > I'm calling a vote to accept "Livy" into the Apache Incubator. > > > > The full proposal is available below, and is also available in the wiki

Re: [VOTE] - Approve the release of Apache Joshua incubating 6.1 (rc4)

Hi, Just wondering if the "All rights reserved” may imply that it's not licensed under a permissive license? I’m unaware of the history / providence of that file so was enquiring if anyone on the project had any more info where it come from. Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] - Approve the release of Apache Joshua incubating 6.1 (rc4)

Hi, > The mentioned files should come from [1.2], which contains AL2 header. Sure I can see that but where did the files original come from and how where they originally licensed? For instance I can see the same(?) file here without an ASF header [1] Thanks, Justin 1. https://github.com/redpo

[VOTE][CANCEL]: Apache Weex-incubating Release 0.12.0-RC4

HI, We'll cancel this vote and start a new RC later. -- Best Regards! sospartan http://weex.apache.org/