+1 (non-binding)
Great to see Pulsar joining the ASF and more and more projects are built
over Apache BookKeeper!
- Sijie
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 7:39 PM, Bryan Call wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> As the champion for Pulsar, I would like to start a VOTE to bring the
> project in as Apache incubator podl
Hi All,
As the champion for Pulsar, I would like to start a VOTE to bring the
project in as Apache incubator podling.
The ASF voting rules are described:
https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
A vote for accepting a new Apache Incubator podling is a majority vote for
which
only
Will,
(moving general@incubator to BCC)
I'll point out that the expectations of a podling are skewed based on how
that podling is operating. If we see a high level of on list activity,
making it clear that its list first, it may make sense to graduate a less
diverse podling, simply because its c
Hi John, I'm glad you enjoyed the presentation, ApacheCon was a great
forum.
All mentors are currently active, and right now the way in which Edgent
most needs mentorship is in its outreach to developers. From a technical
perspective, I think Edgent is mature for its age and number of committers,
Thanks John.
By vendoring I did indeed mean duplicating code for the purpose of guaranteeing
availably and locking the particular revision in use.
I’ll clarify and check in with legal-discuss
—Eric
> On May 16, 2017, at 3:56 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> Eric,
>
> Some thoughts, and I'll b
On 5/16/17 2:17 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
William,
Great presentation this afternoon.
I'd like offer to help you guys as a mentor, you do currently have 4
mentors. Are all 4 mentors active in the project?
Hi John, I am not involved in the project from a technical perspective,
except I helpe
Hello Incubator PMC,
The vote has PASSED with 3 +1 binding votes from the Incubator PMC members,
and no 0 or -1 votes:
+1 Roman Shaposhnik
+1 Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik
+1 P. Taylor Goetz
On behalf of the MADlib community, thank you very much to the reviewers.
We will proceed with promoting this
William,
Great presentation this afternoon.
I'd like offer to help you guys as a mentor, you do currently have 4
mentors. Are all 4 mentors active in the project?
John
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 9:28 PM William Marshall wrote:
> Thanks for posting this, Kathey. For those who are interested in m
+1 (binding)
* Signature good.
* DISCLAIMER exists
* L&N files look good.
* Apache headers in source files where appropriate [1]
* No binaries in source archive
-Taylor
[1] Pretty complex licensing situation required some “light” reading to get the
full story (LEGAL-293 + background, etc.) ;)
Hi,
My apologies if this is the wrong forum to ask..Can someone please
add permission for the users dangogh and neuman to modify Jenkins
configuration for the incubator-trafficcontrol project?
thanks.. Dan
-
To unsubscribe
Eric,
Some thoughts, and I'll be honest this is a better discussion for
legal-discuss over general@incubator.
Generally speaking the ASF is cautious about hostile forks. However, it
looks like the author is comfortable with forks of the project for this
notion (https://bitbucket.org/liamstask/go
Thanks Roman.
Yes, that would be great to have a 3rd reviewer look and evaluate.
The MADlib community worked super hard to put up a very clean release,
as per all of the guidance and suggestions that we have received
as an incubating project and on the 1.11 RC's. So I think it is our best
releas
12 matches
Mail list logo
