Re: [VOTE] Superset Proposal for Apache Incubator

2017-04-26 Thread Jeff Feng
Hello everyone, Thank you for checking out our proposal on Superset and for your consideration for the Apache Incubator. So far, I believe we have 8 binding votes and 2 non-binding votes. As Taylor mentioned earlier, we made a minor update to the wording in the "Source and Intellectual Property

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

2017-04-26 Thread Matteo Merli
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 7:49 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > Or not. Using other projects is not necessarily relevant to whether or not > the proposed podling has a community. > > I have to be careful about committing to Mentoring. I have some interest > in such a project. I'd want gave a technical conve

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

2017-04-26 Thread Matteo Merli
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 7:30 PM John D. Ament wrote: > Its great to see another messaging solution come to the ASF. Does your > platform support any formats like AMQP, STOMP? There are currently many messaging APIs and wire protocol specifications, but for Pulsar we have opted for a custom wir

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

2017-04-26 Thread Dave Fisher
Hi, Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 26, 2017, at 7:29 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > Joe, > > Its customary to bring in the entire body of the proposal in the discussion > thread. > > Its good to see that someone stepped up to be Champion. You still need > mentors. Was Bryan planning to also men

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

2017-04-26 Thread Bryan Call
I wan’t planning on being a mentor, but I might be able to be convinced otherwise. -Bryan > On Apr 26, 2017, at 7:29 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > Joe, > > Its customary to bring in the entire body of the proposal in the discussion > thread. > > Its good to see that someone stepped up to be

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

2017-04-26 Thread John D. Ament
Joe, Its customary to bring in the entire body of the proposal in the discussion thread. Its good to see that someone stepped up to be Champion. You still need mentors. Was Bryan planning to also mentor the project? While he is a foundation member, he is not on the IPMC. Its great to see anot

Re: [VOTE] Superset Proposal for Apache Incubator

2017-04-26 Thread Edward J. Yoon
+1 binding On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Naresh Agarwal wrote: > +1 (non-binding). > > Thanks > Naresh Agarwal > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 5:06 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Joe Witt wrote: >> >> > +1 (binding) >> > >> > On Tue, Apr 25

Re: [VOTE] Superset Proposal for Apache Incubator

2017-04-26 Thread Naresh Agarwal
+1 (non-binding). Thanks Naresh Agarwal On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 5:06 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Joe Witt wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Jitendra Pandey > > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > On 4/25/17,

Re: [VOTE] Superset Proposal for Apache Incubator

2017-04-26 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
There was a minor change to the proposal in the Incubator wiki, so technically what were voting on and the wiki don't match. I'm okay with that and don't think it should disrupt the vote. Highlighting the change in this thread should be enough. +1 (binding) I would recommend asking for/finding

Next Steps for Sirona

2017-04-26 Thread John D. Ament
Sirona Podling, After discussing the current state of the project on the Incubator's general list, we've come to the conclusion that while the project is stable, it lacks the core needs of a TLP - a voting PMC. At this time, we would like to ask you to identify a new TLP sponsor to graduate in to

Incubator PMC Board Report - May 2017

2017-04-26 Thread John D. Ament
May 2017 Incubator report timeline: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/May2017 Wed May 03 -- Podling reports due by end of day Sun May 07 -- Shepherd reviews due by end of day Sun May 07 -- Summary due by end of day Tue May 09 -- Mentor signoff due by end of day Wed May 10

Re: [VOTE] Superset Proposal for Apache Incubator

2017-04-26 Thread Ted Dunning
+1 (binding) On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Joe Witt wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Jitendra Pandey > wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > > > On 4/25/17, 1:27 PM, "Julian Hyde" wrote: > > > > +1 binding > > > > > On Apr 25, 2017, at 12:48 PM, moon soo Lee > wro

[PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

2017-04-26 Thread Joe Francis
Dear Apache Incubator Community, We would like to submit the Pulsar proposal to the incubator. Our draft is available at: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PulsarProposal A quick overview of Pulsar: Pulsar is a highly scalable, low latency messaging platform running on commodity hardware.

[ANNOUNCE] Apache DistributedLog 0.4.0-incubating Release

2017-04-26 Thread Sijie Guo
The Apache DistributedLog team would like to announce the release of Apache DistributedLog 0.4.0-incubating. Apache DistributedLog (incubating) is a high performance replicated log store. It provides replicated-log as the storage primitive for building real-time services. Its serves as a fundament

Re: [PROPOSAL] Superset Proposal for Apache Incubator

2017-04-26 Thread Raphael Bircher
Hi Max I wonder how many of the developers are Airhub emploiees and how many work for Hortoonworks. In many proposal you have a list with the initial committers who reveals there affiliation. Regards Raphael Am .04.2017, 01:42 Uhr, schrieb Maxime Beauchemin : Hi Raphael, what kind of

Re: Incubator Governance Change

2017-04-26 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi, On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > ...I have argued before for a single Mentor, with responsibilities just like > the PMC Chairs and if failing the duties, duly replaced by IPMC... Previous discussions led to proposals to have a "podling chair" with a similar role to th

Re: Incubator Governance Change

2017-04-26 Thread Joe Schaefer
What exactly are we trying to achieve here? There is a record number of podlings in incubation and the best ideas so far are to shame more labor out of the people that are already overloaded. Sure that will work, as if burnout wasn't already a problem for mentors. What is the lesson for the podl