Re: Airflow voting on release artifacts

Hi John, Typically one handles a “release candidate” equal to a release, except for the fact that it hasn’t been fully tested and reviewed yet. In case everyone (all entities) is satisfied with the RC it is then just rebranded to Release. Unfortunately, in the python ecosystem the version infor

Re: [PROPOSAL] Superset Proposal for Apache Incubator

"Airbnb will submit a Software Grant Agreement (SGA) as Superset joins the incubator." Should I add this sentence in the proposal? Max On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 5:48 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > I missed this discussion. In your IP section, you list out: > > == Source and Intellectual Property Su

Re: [VOTE] Apache DistributedLog release 0.4.0-incubating (RC#4)

There are 3 binding approving votes and 2 non-binding votes, all of which are following: binding votes: - John D. Ament - Henry Saputra - Justin Mclean non-binding votes: - Ivam Firestone - Jia Zhai There are no disapproving votes. We will proceed with this release as staged. Thanks everyone

Re: [VOTE] Apache DistributedLog release 0.4.0-incubating (RC#4)

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 6:48 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 (binding) > > Checked the source packages: > - incubating in name > - signature and hashes correct > - DISCLAIMER exists > - LICENSE and NOTICE are good > - No unexpected binaries > - All source files have ASF headers > - Can comp

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache DistributedLog release 0.4.0-incubating (RC#4)

Thank you Justin! - Sijie On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Oh, my bad. I didn't check that. I was just counting the votes. So we > need > > one more binding vote for approving this release? > > You now have one more binding vote so can release. > > Thanks, > Jus

Re: View archive on podling private@ list

Dave, I am one of the Weex mentors, and I also don't understand this. I used to be pretty sure that the PPMC was a construct in Incubator without LDAP backing, but perhaps that changed during my absence from the Incubator. Wasn't even committership a matter of the Incubator LDAP group ? And wouldn'

Re: View archive on podling private@ list

Thank you. On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > You must be on the PPMC(podling), a Mentor, or an Apache Member for > private ML access. > > Mentors should be helping podlings with these tasks. > > Regards, > Dave > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Apr 24, 2017, at 7:02 PM, sospa

Re: View archive on podling private@ list

You must be on the PPMC(podling), a Mentor, or an Apache Member for private ML access. Mentors should be helping podlings with these tasks. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 24, 2017, at 7:02 PM, sospartan wrote: > > Yes, that the RESULT I need. Thank you. > But It's empty in conten

Re: View archive on podling private@ list

Yes, that the RESULT I need. Thank you. But It's empty in content when I open this address. I want make sure. So, Is there a specific rule that committer can not view these archives of private podling mail list? On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 2:41 AM, Josh Elser wrote: > To avoid disclosing the name in

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache DistributedLog release 0.4.0-incubating (RC#4)

Hi, > Oh, my bad. I didn't check that. I was just counting the votes. So we need > one more binding vote for approving this release? You now have one more binding vote so can release. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: ge

Re: [VOTE] Apache DistributedLog release 0.4.0-incubating (RC#4)

Hi, +1 (binding) Checked the source packages: - incubating in name - signature and hashes correct - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE are good - No unexpected binaries - All source files have ASF headers - Can compile from source I did notice two MIT licenses [1][2] but the other than the l

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache DistributedLog release 0.4.0-incubating (RC#4)

Oh, my bad. I didn't check that. I was just counting the votes. So we need one more binding vote for approving this release? - Sijie On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 5:11 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Sijie, > > I can't find anyone by the name of Ivam Firestone on the IPMC. Please > double check your bind

Re: Airflow voting on release artifacts

Do you need to cut a vote with something named rc? Why can't you just use the version #? On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 4:18 PM Chris Riccomini wrote: > Hey all, > > We've had a question arise in the Airflow project. We're currently cutting > release candidates (RCs), and voting on those. These RCs co

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache DistributedLog release 0.4.0-incubating (RC#4)

Sijie, I can't find anyone by the name of Ivam Firestone on the IPMC. Please double check your binding votes. http://home.apache.org/phonebook.html?ctte=incubator John On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 6:44 PM Sijie Guo wrote: > There are 3 binding approving votes, all of which are following: > > - Iv

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache DistributedLog release 0.4.0-incubating (RC#4)

There are 3 binding approving votes, all of which are following: - Ivam Firestone - John D. Ament - Henry Saputra There are no disapproving votes. We will proceed with this release as staged. Thanks everyone! - Sijie On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 11:55 PM, Sijie Guo wrote: > Hi all, > > Please

Airflow voting on release artifacts

Hey all, We've had a question arise in the Airflow project. We're currently cutting release candidates (RCs), and voting on those. These RCs contain an artifact with the suffix -rc0, -rc1, etc. The problem with this is that the final RC that passes the vote still has an -rcX in its version number.

Re: Incubator Governance Change

PS to make it clear: I was just refering to the point of podlings being able to let jenkins publish nightly builds to the ASF snapshots Maven repo. It was not meant as remark to any other of the discussed bullets. LieGrue, strub > Am 24.04.2017 um 21:14 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > Many dozen p

Re: Incubator Governance Change

Many dozen podlings do exactly that. Why should that not be allowed? Hell freezing over? LieGrue, strub > Am 23.04.2017 um 06:04 schrieb Niclas Hedhman : > > On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Roman Shaposhnik > wrote: >> I don't >> think releasing something out of ASF that hasn't had at least

Re: Incubator Governance Change

> On Apr 24, 2017, at 11:48 AM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > While podlings have an explicit set of mentors, the IPMC as a whole can be > thought of as an informal set of mentors. Reviewing and voting on podling > release candidates is one way for any IPMC member to help a podling whether a > men

Re: Incubator Governance Change

> On Apr 23, 2017, at 11:09 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote: > > Pat Ferrel wrote on 4/22/17 11:46 AM: >> Probably the wrong place for this but… >> >> What do people think about a governance change for approving releases >> through the IPMC to wit: >> >> A week of no vote activity over the release pro

Re: View archive on podling private@ list

To avoid disclosing the name included in the subject, here is a permalink to the RESULT message for a VOTE for a new committer sent by Adam Feng at 2017-04-24 02:51 (-0400). https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c26b89e59557ae8793bac1eddeb9d03bfa3e4203da0e50face55193b@%3Cprivate.weex.apache.org%

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache PredictionIO 0.11.0 (incubating) RC2

The vote passes with: +1's Andrew Purtell (binding) John D. Ament (binding) Luciano Resende (binding) Pat Ferrel (non-binding) No other votes. RAT issues is tracked by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-62. Thanks everyone! Regards, Donald On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Andrew Purt

RE: [VOTE] Apache Trafodion (incubating) release 2.1.0 RC 3

Hi, No not yet. I sent them a private reminder message as well. Devaraj Das Enis Söztutar Michael Stack Thanks ! Sandhya -Original Message- From: bdelacre...@gmail.com [mailto:bdelacre...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Bertrand Delacretaz Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2017 11:22 PM To: Incuba

Re: Incubator Governance Change

My plan for PPMC votes is to simply send out "friendly reminder" emails every 24 hours after the vote deadline has passed. On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote: > Pat Ferrel wrote on 4/22/17 11:46 AM: > > Probably the wrong place for this but… > > > > What do people think about

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Juneau 6.2.0-incubating-RC1

Bringing over my +1 On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 9:26 AM James Bognar wrote: > The Apache Juneau Incubator PPMC has voted *+5* to release Apache Juneau > 6.2.0-incubating RC1. This vote carries over *+2* binding votes from IPMC > mentors. > > Incubator PMC members please review and vote on this incub

[VOTE] Release Apache Juneau 6.2.0-incubating-RC1

The Apache Juneau Incubator PPMC has voted *+5* to release Apache Juneau 6.2.0-incubating RC1. This vote carries over *+2* binding votes from IPMC mentors. Incubator PMC members please review and vote on this incubator release. Apache Juneau is... - A toolkit for marshalling POJOs to a wide v

Re: [PROPOSAL] Superset Proposal for Apache Incubator

I missed this discussion. In your IP section, you list out: == Source and Intellectual Property Submission Plan == We do not expect any complications for the submission of the Superset code base. Our code is already in Github and there is only a single code base. This IMHO not clear. Does Airb

Re: [VOTE] Superset Proposal for Apache Incubator

+1 binding Love to see Superset to be new incubator project. Best Regards! - Luke Han On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 10:53 PM, Jeff Feng wrote: > Dear Apache Incubator Community, > > We have updated the Superset proposal > (co

Re: [VOTE]: Apache Weex-incubating Release 0.12.0-RC2

On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 7:26 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Sure - but there's still issues with it. And you still need a NOTICE file > in your source distribution. > True. But it would be a single "from Apache..." note, as we are not bundling anything else. > I thought about your points a bit mo