[VOTE] Superset Proposal for Apache Incubator

Dear Apache Incubator Community, We have updated the Superset proposal (copied below) for Apache Incubation with an additional mentor (Luke Han - luke@apache.org), and would like to start a vote thread for acceptance into the incubator. Our

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PredictionIO 0.11.0 (incubating) RC2

No, you are free to make this release provided there is an issue tracking the RAT check failures and a promise to fix them for the next release. > On Apr 23, 2017, at 8:50 AM, Pat Ferrel wrote: > > Many thanks! > > I for one was not aware we could change an RC without a podling vote, which

Re: [VOTE] Apache Trafodion (incubating) release 2.1.0 RC 3

Hi, On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Sandhya Sundaresan wrote: > ...The Trafodion 2.1.0 release is awaiting just one more binding vote before > we can move forward with this release Did your mentors review the release and vote? I don't see any of the names listed at [1] as having voted in t

Re: [VOTE]: Apache Weex-incubating Release 0.12.0-RC2

john, I'll take the work and make NOTICE and LICENSE(s) right. Thanks for this discussion, which will be a good lesson for our newbies. The full-licensed file(SimpleWeexActivity.java) is in old branch, we have fix that in dev. I'll push to master after we have our first RC. On Sun, Apr 23, 20

View archive on podling private@ list

Hi, May I ask who has karma to view archives of podling private@ list? I'm weex-incubating committer, but can't view archive of private. When I try to open https://lists.apache.org/list.html?priv...@weex.apache.org , it's redirect to commits@ list. I need to get permalink of a vote thread. --

RE: [VOTE] Apache Trafodion (incubating) release 2.1.0 RC 3

Hello IPMC community, The Trafodion 2.1.0 release is awaiting just one more binding vote before we can move forward with this release. We have 3 +1 votes and 2 binding votes so far. Could I request one of you to please take a look at the vote message below and help move this along ? Thank

Re: The state of Sirona

Sounds totally right to me. On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 5:28 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > I let this sit for a couple of days to see if anything changed either on > this thread or within Sirona. While I can see there being some concerns > with those who are semi-active within Sirona, there's been n

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PredictionIO 0.11.0 (incubating) RC2

Many thanks! I for one was not aware we could change an RC without a podling vote, which seems better in any case. These issues will be fixed asap in master and the live site. On Apr 22, 2017, at 6:28 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: I was just trying to get something moving. Glad to see it. +1

Re: Incubator Governance Change

Pat Ferrel wrote on 4/22/17 11:46 AM: > Probably the wrong place for this but… > > What do people think about a governance change for approving releases > through the IPMC to wit: > > A week of no vote activity over the release proposal of a podling > should be considered a passing vote. In other

Re: The state of Sirona

I let this sit for a couple of days to see if anything changed either on this thread or within Sirona. While I can see there being some concerns with those who are semi-active within Sirona, there's been no concrete path forward. So I want to propose the following, give Sirona time to identify a

Re: Incubator Governance Change

On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 7:46 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >... > I'm starting to wonder whether the real solution here should be along the > lines > of what a board would do to a TLP if its active PMC shrinks to less > than 3 people. > Oh, that's easy, and has been done quite a few times. The Boa

Re: Incubator Governance Change

On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 7:13 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > > Your proposal violates foundation policy on releases and is therefore a > > nonstarter. The ipmc isn't empowered to restructure release policy. > > Specifically, the problem Joe is po

Re: [VOTE]: Apache Weex-incubating Release 0.12.0-RC2

On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 9:43 PM Niclas Hedhman wrote: > John, > thanks for pointing me to the issue. I argue against Marvin on it, based on > "this is a tool" that is made conveniently available for those who are not > paranoid. > > NOTICE; Ok, let's rename the file. > NOTICES-POSSIBLY-NEEDED-FOR

Re: Incubator Governance Change

On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 12:05 AM Niclas Hedhman wrote: > On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Roman Shaposhnik > wrote: > > I don't > > think releasing something out of ASF that hasn't had at least 3 binding > votes > > would be advisable. > > AFAIK, projects "publish" to > https://repository.apach