Retaining trademarks isn't required, especially if they aren't attached to
strong project.
On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 10:50 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> The "wrong" part (from a project's PoV) is that ASF retains trademarks...
>
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 10:56 AM, P. Taylor Goetz
> wrote:
>
> > +
The "wrong" part (from a project's PoV) is that ASF retains trademarks...
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 10:56 AM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
> +1 for retirement.
>
> There's absolutely nothing wrong with a podling returning to the place
> from whence it came. I'm encouraged that that sentiment seems to be
+1 (binding)
Check:
- build
- signatures and headers
- checksums
- DISCLAIMER
Regards
JB
On 04/11/2017 11:33 AM, Karol Brejna wrote:
Hi IPMC Community,
The PPMC vote to release Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.3-RC1 has passed.
We would like to now submit this release candidate to the IPMC.
+1 for retirement.
There's absolutely nothing wrong with a podling returning to the place from
whence it came. I'm encouraged that that sentiment seems to be proliferating
among the IPMC.
-Taylor
> On Apr 16, 2017, at 11:33 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>
> Sounds like consensus is coming tog
Hi all,
This is a friendly reminder for the release voting of Apache PredictionIO
0.11.0-incubating-rc2. The voting will stay open until there are enough
votes for acceptance or rejection.
Regards,
Donald
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Donald Szeto wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The PredictionIO comm
Hi everyone --regarding the standard Apache Incubator logo (rectangular)
vs. standalone "Powered By", there often are projects/podlings that do
not have logos.
This would be a good way to promote such projects.
I suspect it won't be *widely* used, but the option is good to have.
Another wa
Hi all,
following the discussion thread, I think we can start the vote on accepting
Amaterasu into the Apache Incubator.
The ASF voting rules are described:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
A vote for accepting a new Apache Incubator podling is a majority vote for which
Sounds like consensus is coming together, then. Sound right?
On Apr 16, 2017 06:03, "larry mccay" wrote:
> H - interesting points about incubator vs github and overhead.
> I do think my statement was unclear though.
>
> I was saying exactly the same thing about struggling podlings.
> Much b
H - interesting points about incubator vs github and overhead.
I do think my statement was unclear though.
I was saying exactly the same thing about struggling podlings.
Much better to find out in the incubator than as a TLP that the apache way
isn't really going to work for them at the moment
On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 3:04 PM larry mccay wrote:
> Well said.
> It is healthy to not have a podling graduate and subsequently struggle as a
> TLP.
> This is actually a success of sorts.
>
> At least until a majority of podlings have trouble. :)
>
>
I may be reading Ted's email differently. Or
Le 16 avr. 2017 06:58, "Niclas Hedhman" a écrit :
One could also ask the question; Considering how hyped "devops" culture is
right now, the central role that monitoring and visualization of that is
for devops, How come this project can't attract hordes of people? Is there
something inherent in Ap
I ran the build from source and went through the source code, every thing
looks good.
Here is my +1.
Willem Jiang
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Karol Brejna
wrote:
12 matches
Mail list logo
