Re: Creating a podli...@incubator.apache.org mailing list

+1 for moderation. -Taylor > On Apr 6, 2017, at 5:21 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > > I agree to both points. I've already started on the script, based on the > existing python scripts we use to generate our reports. > > How do others feel about the moderation? Its only for "official" > communic

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

Thanks for the info Greg! Ralph > On Apr 6, 2017, at 9:14 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 4:04 AM, Thorsten Schöning > wrote: > >... > > and I am not quite sure what the process is to move > > from svn to git without losing history. I guess I wil

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 4:04 AM, Thorsten Schöning wrote: >... > > and I am not quite sure what the process is to move > > from svn to git without losing history. I guess I will just create > > a Jira issue for infra and find out. > > From my understanding, a logging PMC needs to create the GIT r

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.6.2 (incubating)

We are still in need of two further +1 votes. Is there someone else so kind to support us, please? Thanks in advance, Svante ᐧ 2017-04-03 15:00 GMT+02:00 Tom Barber : > Compiles, RAT looks okay, artefacts look okay, sigs look okay. > > +1 from me > > Tom > > On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Svan

Re: Revisit policy that all IPMC members have commit privs to all incubator repositories.

John, your email confuses me for many reasons. On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 6:57 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > This solution describes one of the many reasons I feel the incubator itself > is broken. We're trying to rewrite policy, as a means to work around some > awkward setup sitting around, instead of

Re: Revisit policy that all IPMC members have commit privs to all incubator repositories.

John D. Ament wrote on 4/6/17 6:57 AM: > This solution describes one of the many reasons I feel the incubator itself > is broken. We're trying to rewrite policy, as a means to work around some > awkward setup sitting around, instead of just treating podlings as regular > projects, with some restri

Re: Revisit policy that all IPMC members have commit privs to all incubator repositories.

Hi I think this sounds very reasonable. +1 Regards Felix > Am 06.04.2017 um 07:06 schrieb Sam Ruby : > > Background, from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13804 > >> With this feedback and review, I believe we're still operating as expected. >> >> * Per current policy, IPMC member

Re: Revisit policy that all IPMC members have commit privs to all incubator repositories.

This solution describes one of the many reasons I feel the incubator itself is broken. We're trying to rewrite policy, as a means to work around some awkward setup sitting around, instead of just treating podlings as regular projects, with some restrictions in place. Create something in ldap that

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

Guten Tag Ralph Goers, am Donnerstag, 6. April 2017 um 07:10 schrieben Sie: > No. To be honest, I’m not 100% sure if the community wants to move > to git or not "We" want, as nobody objected in the discussion and Matts description of how to deal with GitHub PRs sounds very promising. > and I am

Re: Revisit policy that all IPMC members have commit privs to all incubator repositories.

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 7:06 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > ...I believe that the alternative is technically feasible: have each podling > manage a list of committers for that podling: > > https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/ Which is what they will have to do anyway after graduating, right? In which ca