Switching this to a +1 (binding)
"sjanc" on IRC was able to point me in the right direction enough to
make me (think) that I have compiled everything from source :) (at least
for one target)
This would be a good area to include some clarity in the docs.
Josh Elser wrote:
+0 (binding)
* L&N
That's no problem Josh, we will resubmit a vote through dev and get the
next rc out on general early this week.
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
> I'm so sorry, Marc.
>
> I didn't want to force you to have to roll another RC after the LEGAL
> issue John pointed out -- re-readi
+0 (binding)
* L&N pretty good (caveat below)
* sigs/xsums OK
* Was able to build all but mynewt-core (thus the +0). Am still trying
to figure this out so I can switch to a +1.
* Didn't see any binaries in source release(s)
* DISCLAIMER is present
* Website has incubator reference
* incubating
Hi all,
After being opened for over more than 72 hours, the vote for releasing Apache
Airflow 1.8.0-incubating passed [1] with 4 binding +1s, and no 0 or -1.
* Binding votes +1s: *
Chris Douglas
Jakob Homann
Jitendra Pandey
John D. Ament
Thanks to everyone who reviewed, we really appreciate yo
The 72 hour window has elapsed and the vote is now CLOSED. With 2
additional binding +1 votes on this list added to the 3 IPMC +1s from the
dev vote, this vote is ***successful***.
Binding Vote Summary:
+1: 5
+0: 0
-1:0
IPMC Voting Record (** Voted on dev list):
Matt Franklin: +1
+1 (binding)
* xsums/sigs OK
* rat check passed and can build from src (for both projects)
* Spot checked included files
* Commit is published in scm
* DISCLAIMER is OK
* L&N seem appropriate
* Spot checked dependencies
One suggestion for the future is to prune your RAT plugin
configurations' e
I'm so sorry, Marc.
I didn't want to force you to have to roll another RC after the LEGAL
issue John pointed out -- re-reading my last message, I didn't clearly
state my intent to switch my vote from -1 to +1 (I'll blame that on
being under the weather).
Marc Spehlmann wrote:
Hello IPMC,
T
