[VOTE] Release Apache HAWQ 2.1.0.0-incubating (RC4)

2017-02-21 Thread Ed Espino
Hello Incubator PMC (IPMC), The Apache HAWQ community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache HAWQ 2.1.0.0-incubating (source only release). We kindly request that the IPMC members review and vote on this incubator release. The PPMC VOTE thread is here: https://lists.apache.org/th

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Software grant for Ratis (incubating)

2017-02-21 Thread John D. Ament
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 8:43 PM Jitendra Pandey wrote: > A software grant document > (https://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt) from Hortonworks has > already been filed with secret...@apache.org, and has been ack-ed. > > Then other than verifying new license headers are in place, as ne

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Software grant for Ratis (incubating)

2017-02-21 Thread Jitendra Pandey
A software grant document (https://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt) from Hortonworks has already been filed with secret...@apache.org, and has been ack-ed. On 2/21/17, 5:28 PM, "John D. Ament" wrote: >Please note that IP Clearance is not for new projects, it is for code >donations.

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Software grant for Ratis (incubating)

2017-02-21 Thread John D. Ament
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 8:33 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Even going as far back as the first commit, it was licensed to the > Apache Software Foundation > > Perhaps a silly question. I expected the initial commit to be ALv2 but not > licensed to the ASF. Can you license something to the A

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Software grant for Ratis (incubating)

2017-02-21 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Even going as far back as the first commit, it was licensed to the Apache > Software Foundation Perhaps a silly question. I expected the initial commit to be ALv2 but not licensed to the ASF. Can you license something to the ASF without permission? Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Gobblin to enter Apache Incubator

2017-02-21 Thread Naresh Agarwal
+1 (non binding). We had used Gobblin in past and found it quite powerful. Looking forward to a exciting road-map ahead in Gobblin. Thanks Naresh On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:31 AM, Abhishek Tiwari < abhishektiwari.bt...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Abhishek > > On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Software grant for Ratis (incubating)

2017-02-21 Thread John D. Ament
Please note that IP Clearance is not for new projects, it is for code donations. In this case, we would expect an SGA from Hortonworks, or nothing since the project is already Apache licensed. Even going as far back as the first commit, it was licensed to the Apache Software Foundation - https://

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Software grant for Ratis (incubating)

2017-02-21 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Look fine to me, no binary files, source code has headers. BTW your LICENSE is referring to dependancies (including a EPL license one) rather than what is bundled inside the repo (which strangely are not mentioned), but that’s not an IP clearance issue. Thanks, Justin -

[IP CLEARANCE] Software grant for Ratis (incubating)

2017-02-21 Thread Jitendra Pandey
Please check the ip-clearance form for a software grant for Ratis source to the ASF by Hortonworks Inc. http://incubator.staging.apache.org/ip-clearance/ratis.html Thanks jitendra

Re: Podling Graduation Rally

2017-02-21 Thread Upayavira
I think that nothing is likely to change in the project - it is going to go on the same as this for a long time. If it is ready, it is right on the bottom of minimal. It does have enough prospective PMC members, but just enough - maybe 4 or 5. It has made a release, and it has just managed a sourc

Re: Podling Graduation Rally

2017-02-21 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:15 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 2:52 PM Roman Shaposhnik > wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Marvin Humphrey >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 6:31 AM, John D. Ament >> wrote: >> > >> >> So are we saying that the code modificatio

[CANCEL] [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.11.0-incubating [rc1]

2017-02-21 Thread Gokul Gunasekaran
I would like to cancel the vote for Apache Tephra 0.11.0-incubating release. This is because we found a last minute major bug TEPHRA-223. After fixing the bug, we will restart the release process with a new release candidate. Thanks, Gokul On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 3:45 PM, James Taylor wrote: >

Re: Podling Graduation Rally

2017-02-21 Thread John D. Ament
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 2:52 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Marvin Humphrey > wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 6:31 AM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > > >> So are we saying that the code modifications are sub-licensed? Or > >> re-licensed? > > > > Think of each fil

[VOTE] Apache Toree (incubating) 0.1.0-rc6 as 0.1.0

2017-02-21 Thread Chip Senkbeil
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Toree (incubating) version 0.1.0. A vote on this release has passed within the Toree PPMC. PPMC vote result thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/44231a84f4034482b81bd034d800e1f03243e21894da8550a75ae389@ PPMC vote thread: https://

Re: Podling Graduation Rally

2017-02-21 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 6:31 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > >> So are we saying that the code modifications are sub-licensed? Or >> re-licensed? > > Think of each file as the result of layering changesets on top of each > other. Each changes

Re: [VOTE] Gobblin to enter Apache Incubator

2017-02-21 Thread Abhishek Tiwari
+1 (non-binding) Abhishek On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hi Craig > > On 20 February 2017 at 00:23, Craig Russell > wrote: > > > Hi Olivier, > > > > Can you also post the link to this proposal on https://wiki.apache.org/ > > incubator/ProjectProposals ? > > > > Sure. do

Re: Podling Graduation Rally

2017-02-21 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 6:31 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > So are we saying that the code modifications are sub-licensed? Or > re-licensed? Think of each file as the result of layering changesets on top of each other. Each changeset has its own copyright holder and each copyright holder grants a l

Re: Adding committers to a PPMC

2017-02-21 Thread Henri Yandell
Doh - the UI meant I assumed I didn't have permissions as all I got on clicking + was a Search field. I will give that feedback to the whimsical project. I was also assuming that Whimsy gets the data from somewhere rather than being the original source. Thanks Craig, Hen On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at

[VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC11)

2017-02-21 Thread Dan Kirkwood
Hello Incubator PMC, The Apache Traffic Control community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating. We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release. The VOTE RESULT is here: https://lists.apache.org/th

Re: Podling Graduation Rally

2017-02-21 Thread John D. Ament
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:49 AM Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Mike Jumper > wrote: > > AFAIK, only the copyright holder can relicense a copyrighted work, > whereas > > others may sublicense under compatible terms so long as the original > > license grants that permis

Re: Adding committers to a PPMC

2017-02-21 Thread Craig Russell
Hi Hen, At the bottom of the PPMC list is a big bold “+”. If you click on that, you can add apache ids to the PPMC. HTH, Craig > On Feb 20, 2017, at 11:36 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > > When I look at https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/mxnet - I only see the > mentors for the project listed

Re: Adding committers to a PPMC

2017-02-21 Thread John D. Ament
This is probably a better question for dev@whimsical, the IPMC provided no input on how to implement this. There are no requirements from the IPMC to have people appear on these pages. John On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 2:36 AM Henri Yandell wrote: > When I look at https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/p