On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 10:24 PM Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 9:34 AM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 12:19 PM Marvin Humphrey >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 6:41 AM, John D. Ament
> >> wrote:
> >> > However, regarding the
> >> > binaries.
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 9:34 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 12:19 PM Marvin Humphrey
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 6:41 AM, John D. Ament
>> wrote:
>> > However, regarding the
>> > binaries. In a recent discussion (on legal-discuss) it was decided that
>> > this was
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 8:58 PM Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 5:47 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
> > [3]:
> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what-must-every-release-contain
>
> That document has been superseded. Official Release Policy, curated
> by VP Legal, is here:
>
Sorry, I'll clarify.
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 9:01 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > If you look in the tar.gz you'll see that it's R source code, and a JAR
> for
> > testing. Its not compiled code.
>
> Looks like the jars contain compiled code to me:
> ./sparkr-interpreter/src/main/resources/
Hi,
> If you look in the tar.gz you'll see that it's R source code, and a JAR for
> testing. Its not compiled code.
Looks like the jars contain compiled code to me:
./sparkr-interpreter/src/main/resources/sparkr_bundle.tar.gz - Contains R code
and a jar that contains class files.
./sparkr-inter
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 5:47 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> [3]: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what-must-every-release-contain
That document has been superseded. Official Release Policy, curated
by VP Legal, is here:
http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy
Marvin Humphrey
---
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 4:59 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Same thread. Specifically Mark T's response [1] and Craig's affirmation
> [2]
>
> Not sure that applies here as I think we have compiled code without the
> corresponding source. Can someone on the project confirm?
>
>
If you look i
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 8:51 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 8:25 PM Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 1:37 PM, Felix Meschberger
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Sam
>> >
>> > Like this very much. Thanks !
>> >
>> > Started doing that for OpenWhisk and realized some strange
Hi,
> Same thread. Specifically Mark T's response [1] and Craig's affirmation [2]
Not sure that applies here as I think we have compiled code without the
corresponding source. Can someone on the project confirm?
Even then I would expect that to be an unusual exception where there was no
other
+1 (non-binding)
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 5:20 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> > Hi Incubator folk,
> >
> >I would like to call a vote for accepting "MXNet" for incubation in
> the
> > Apache Incubator.
> >
> > The full proposal is availab
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 5:20 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Hi Incubator folk,
>
>I would like to call a vote for accepting "MXNet" for incubation in the
> Apache Incubator.
>
> The full proposal is available at this wiki link:
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MXNetProposal?action=recall&
11 matches
Mail list logo
