Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.10-incubating (RC2)

2016-12-13 Thread Mike Jumper
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 5:07 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 6:05 PM Mike Jumper > wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:40 AM, Justin Mclean >> wrote: >> > >> >> Would organizing the artifacts into separate "source/" and "binary/" >> directories suffice? >> > >> > That seems

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.10-incubating (RC2)

2016-12-13 Thread John D. Ament
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 6:05 PM Mike Jumper wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:40 AM, Justin Mclean > wrote: > > > >> Would organizing the artifacts into separate "source/" and "binary/" > directories suffice? > > > > That seems like an excellent solution. > > > > Excellent. Will do. > > Am I c

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.10-incubating (RC2)

2016-12-13 Thread Mike Jumper
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:40 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > >> Would organizing the artifacts into separate "source/" and "binary/" >> directories suffice? > > That seems like an excellent solution. > Excellent. Will do. Am I correct in assuming that this is not a difficulty which blocks further r

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.10-incubating (RC2)

2016-12-13 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > The source artifacts are guacamole-client-0.9.10-incubating.tar.gz and > guacamole-server-0.9.10-incubating.tar.gz. The other artifacts are > convenience binaries which are built from guacamole-client. Thanks for that. > In the context of the project website, I believe there is already a >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.10-incubating (RC2)

2016-12-13 Thread Mike Jumper
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:11 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Can you clarify which of the release artefact are source releases. > Hi Justin, The source artifacts are guacamole-client-0.9.10-incubating.tar.gz and guacamole-server-0.9.10-incubating.tar.gz. The other artifacts are convenience b

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.10.0-incubating [rc1]

2016-12-13 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 binding I checked: - incubating in artefact names - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE good - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers - Can compile from source You might want to consider signing the artefact with an apache email address rather than a gmail one.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.10-incubating (RC2)

2016-12-13 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Can you clarify which of the release artefact are source releases. It might be a good idea to add “-src” or “-bin” to the artefact names to make this clearer. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@inc

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Eagle to top level project

2016-12-13 Thread Henry Saputra
Good input, I was kind of on a fence with the "etc" word. I also recommend to remove it when sending it as official resolution to board. Thanks also for catching the typo. - Henry On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 9:22 PM, Edward Zhang > wrote