+1. cool
> 在 2016年11月25日，15:32，Stian Soiland-Reyes 写道：
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>> On 24 Nov 2016 10:47 pm, "Edward J. Yoon" wrote:
>>
>> Greetings!
>>
>> I would like to call a vote for accepting "Weex" for incubation in the
>> Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below. We ask the
+1 (binding)
On 24 Nov 2016 10:47 pm, "Edward J. Yoon" wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> I would like to call a vote for accepting "Weex" for incubation in the
> Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below. We ask the
> Incubator PMC to sponsor it, with myself (Edward J. Yoon) as Champion, and
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 11:47 PM, Edward J. Yoon
wrote:
...
> === Nominated Mentors ===
> * Luke Han ( luke.hq at gmail dot com )
> * Willem Jiang (willem.jiang at gmail dot com)
> * Stephan Ewen (sewen at apache dot org)
> * Niclas Hedhman (niclas at hedhman dot org)
...
Please list the
Hi,
+1 binding
For the source release checked:
- incubating in names
- signatures and hashes correct
- disclaimer exists
- NOTICE is OK (but has some extra text that could be removed)
- LICENSE is OK. It includes jQuery and bootstrap but these don’t seem to be
bundled and can be removed?
- Coupl
Gently reminder for the IPMC about this vote.
Thanks
Regards
JB
On 11/22/2016 05:13 AM, Kam Kasravi wrote:
Hi IPMC Community
The PPMC vote to release Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.2-RC2 has passed.
We would like to now submit this release candidate to the IPMC.
The PPMC vote thread is here
+1
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 6:47 AM, Edward J. Yoon
wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> I would like to call a vote for accepting "Weex" for incubation in the
> Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below. We ask the
> Incubator PMC to sponsor it, with myself (Edward J. Yoon) as Champion, and
> L
+1
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 6:47 AM, Edward J. Yoon
wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> I would like to call a vote for accepting "Weex" for incubation in the
> Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below. We ask the
> Incubator PMC to sponsor it, with myself (Edward J. Yoon) as Champion, and
> L
Greetings!
$B!!(B
I would like to call a vote for accepting "Weex" for incubation in the
Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below. We ask the
Incubator PMC to sponsor it, with myself (Edward J. Yoon) as Champion, and
Luke Han, Willem Jiang, Stephan Ewen, and Niclas Hedhman voluntee
Stephan,
What you suggest should work (if you add another dependency to provide the
needed classes).
You have to be careful, however, because your consumers may expect to get
the full json.org API.
I would suggest that exclusions like this should only be used while your
direct dependency still h
eBay legal has already reviewed this name before open source to github, there's
no trademark problem for griffin.
Thx
Alex
> 在 2016年11月24日，下午4:57，Jochen Theodorou 写道：
>
> just a remark on the name. Griffin is used in a lot of company names and is a
> family name. That may induce trademark pr
That's an issue. Want to let them know directly that their website needs
fixing?
On Nov 24, 2016 1:00 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > RE Justin - that's a potential issue, but is also how github works.
>
> It may be how GitHub works but it is IMO against release policy especially
> as on
Hi,
> RE Justin - that's a potential issue, but is also how github works.
It may be how GitHub works but it is IMO against release policy especially as
on their site they link to GitHub and not the Apache release area.
Thanks,
Justin
-
Hmm thought I voted +1 already
RE Julian's concerns - the artifact includes "incubating" so that passes
the incubator requirement. The requirement doesn't say that it has to
include it in the pom's version.
RE Justin - that's a potential issue, but is also how github works. Since
they're doing
Hi,
+1 binding
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- NOTICE good
- LICENSE is OK but could be improved (see below)
- Can compile from source
For the LICENSE rather than pointing to a URL of the license for Stix please
include the license in the relea
Understood. There's a discussion on legal-discuss you may want to join in
on. The current ruling is that you would have until April 30 2017 to
remove the dependency.
John
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 9:19 AM Karl Wright wrote:
> The Apache ManifoldCF project got an official Legal ruling on the jso
The Apache ManifoldCF project got an official Legal ruling on the json
license and accepted it many years ago.
Thanks,
Karl
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 7:11 AM, Guillaume Laforge
wrote:
> And Apache Groovy also has some great JSON support as well, with a super
> fast parser, and serializer as wel
And Apache Groovy also has some great JSON support as well, with a super
fast parser, and serializer as well.
So there's choice at Apache regarding JSON :-D
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Hendrik Dev
wrote:
> and of course there is also Apache Johnzon ;-)
> http://johnzon.apache.org/
>
> On T
On Wed, 23 Nov 2016, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
My Wiki username is SzeTszWo. Could you add me to the
ContributorsGroup? Thanks.
Karma granted, happy editing!
Nick
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
F
and of course there is also Apache Johnzon ;-)
http://johnzon.apache.org/
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> Just to be on the safe side:
>
> If project X depends on another project Y that uses json.org (and thus
> project X has json.org as a transitive dependency) is it suff
Hi,
My Wiki username is SzeTszWo. Could you add me to the ContributorsGroup?
Thanks.
Tsz-Wo
Just to be on the safe side:
If project X depends on another project Y that uses json.org (and thus
project X has json.org as a transitive dependency) is it sufficient to
exclude the transitive json.org dependency in the reference to project Y?
Something like that:
org.apache.hive.hcatalog
is that library able to deal with the jdk9 module system?
On 24.11.2016 02:16, James Bognar wrote:
Shameless plug for Apache Juneau that has a cleanroom implementation of a
JSON serializer and parser in context of a common serialization API that
includes a variety of serialization languages for
just a remark on the name. Griffin is used in a lot of company names and
is a family name. That may induce trademark problems, but I did not do
any research on that.
Well and I am not happy about Griffin and Griffon being so near
together, even though the later project most likely has no trade
23 matches
Mail list logo
