Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.6.2 (incubating) - rc1

Hi, +1 binding I checked: - incubating in artefact name - signature and hash correct - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE have a couple of very minor issues - No unexpected binary files in source release - All Apache licensed file have ASF headers - Can compile from source For the LICENSE f

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams 0.4.0 incubating

Hi, -1 (binding) due to the inclusion of so-called Category X [3] GPL licensed files. These files [1][2] contain GPL licensed content and IMO can’t be included in a release. Other issues: - The files [2] also contains other licensed content (copyright UserLand Software and Scripting News) that

[VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.6.2 (incubating) - rc1

Incubator PMC: Apache Ranger community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache Ranger 0.6.2 (incubating). [VOTE RESULT] thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/11302204c77df6c9d86a3e75078ba0a9690a09bf186c5277acdce11b@%3Cdev.ranger.apache.org%3E Apache ranger-0.6.2-rc1

Re: [Incubator Wiki] Update of "November2016" by zhaijia

Thanks so much for your help. On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 10:30 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > Jia, > > I'll fix the conflicts. > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 10:30 PM Apache Wiki wrote: > > > Dear Wiki user, > > > > You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Incubator Wiki" > > for change noti

Re: [Incubator Wiki] Update of "November2016" by zhaijia

Jia, I'll fix the conflicts. On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 10:30 PM Apache Wiki wrote: > Dear Wiki user, > > You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Incubator Wiki" > for change notification. > > The "November2016" page has been changed by zhaijia: > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/N

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams 0.4.0 incubating

Hi, The artefacts are missing from the release area / are not the correct version. [1] This was brought up last release can you please fix. Thanks, Justin 1. https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ - To unsubscribe, e

Re: Initial Reminder - Incubator PMC Report - November 2016

I thought so. Just wanted to make sure. Thanks! On Tuesday, November 1, 2016, John D. Ament wrote: > Hi James, > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 9:45 PM James Bognar > > wrote: > > > Hi John, > > > > I don't see Juneau listed in the incubator report. Do we not need to > > report this month? > > > >

Re: Initial Reminder - Incubator PMC Report - November 2016

Hi James, On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 9:45 PM James Bognar wrote: > Hi John, > > I don't see Juneau listed in the incubator report. Do we not need to > report this month? > No. Podlings only need to report monthly for their first 3 months. Beyond that, its once per quarter. Per [1], Juneau is do

Re: Wiki write access

Added, happy editing! On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 9:27 PM Marius van Niekerk < marius.v.niek...@gmail.com> wrote: > My user (mariusvniekerk) needs wiki access to author the podling report for > Apache Toree. > > regards > Marius van Niekerk > > > -- > regards > Marius van Niekerk >

Re: Initial Reminder - Incubator PMC Report - November 2016

Hi John, I don't see Juneau listed in the incubator report. Do we not need to report this month? On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 6:59 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > November 2016 Incubator report timeline: > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2016 > > Wed November 02 -- Podling reports due

Wiki write access

My user (mariusvniekerk) needs wiki access to author the podling report for Apache Toree. regards Marius van Niekerk -- regards Marius van Niekerk

[VOTE] Release Apache Streams 0.4.0 incubating

Hi Incubator PMC, The Apache Streams community has voted and approved the proposal to release Apache Streams 0.4.0 (incubating). We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members to review and vote on this incubator release. Thread [VOTE] : https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/104310391acd0c4ad009

Re: Release License Audit

Hi Eric, > On Nov 1, 2016, at 9:30 AM, Eric Friedrich wrote: > > Many of the release guidelines mention a license audit of the released > source files. > > Are there any particular requirements as to how this audit is performed? No. The requirement is that all files be examined to determine if

Release License Audit

Many of the release guidelines mention a license audit of the released source files. Are there any particular requirements as to how this audit is performed? Can the audit be done manually? I've seen references to using the Apache RAT tool. Is this use required or just suggestion? How do other

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache S2Graph 0.1.0-incubating release

Congratulations, S2Graph! On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 11:46 PM DO YUNG YOON wrote: > The Apache S2Graph team is pleased to announce the release of Apache > S2Graph 0.1.0-incubating. > > Apache S2Graph(incubating) is a graph database designed to handle > transactional graph processing at scale. Its RES

[ANNOUNCE] Apache S2Graph 0.1.0-incubating release

The Apache S2Graph team is pleased to announce the release of Apache S2Graph 0.1.0-incubating. Apache S2Graph(incubating) is a graph database designed to handle transactional graph processing at scale. Its REST API allows you to store, manage and query relational information using edge and vertex