Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating

Hi, > Much of the text in the NOTICE is propagated from Apache Lucene > (https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/master/lucene/NOTICE.txt). > You may want to consider only including the bits that are needed as to reduce t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating

Justin, thanks for the quick review! Comments inline. > On Oct 21, 2016, at 5:15 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > +1 binding > > I checked: > - files name contain incubating > - signatures and hashes good > - DISCLAIMER exists > - NOTICE and LICENSE have some very minor issues (see below)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating

Hi, +1 binding I checked: - files name contain incubating - signatures and hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - NOTICE and LICENSE have some very minor issues (see below) - No unexpected binary files - All Apache files have ASF headers - Can compile from source Minor license issues: - How is this

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Fineract 0.4.0 (incubating)

+1 Release looks good. Thank you for resolving the past licensing issues. I suspect that your NOTICE file could use some polishing, I was unable to generate one for the binary output, see also http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#binary John On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:16 PM Nazeer Sha

Re: [VOTE] Apache S2Graph(incubating) 0.1.0 release RC6

+1 binding Checked hash and signature. Poked around the untar'd src dir. Ran RAT on top level. Got these complaints: ./.gitignore ./.rat-excludes Then found your instructions for how to run RAT (smile) and all looks good. Built from source. Had odd issue in hbase logs complaining couldn't fi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Fineract 0.4.0 (incubating)

Hi, +1 binding I checked: - name includes incubating - hashes and signatures good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE good (nice work there!) - No unexpected binary files - all source file have ASF headers - can compile from source Thanks, Justin ---

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.3.0-incubating [rc4]

Hi, A bit late as the result has been called but as I was 1/2 way through the review I thought I’d finish it. Everything looks good. In future it would be nice to indicate how many binding IPMC votes you had in the vote email. I checked - name contains incubating - signatures and hashes good -

[RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.3.0-incubating [rc4]

*Hi all,* After being opened for over more than 72 hours, the vote for releasing Apache Mnemonic 0.3.0-incubating passed with 3 binding +1s, 11 non-binding +1s and no 0 or -1. **Binding votes +1s:** Patrick Hunt (phunt) Henry Saputra (hsaputra) Gangumalla, Uma (umamahesh) **non-binding votes +1

Podling Shark Tank is coming to Seville near YOU!

Hi! Podling Shark is back and with 63 podlings to chose from http://incubator.apache.org/ everyone should consider giving a short pitch for a podling they are passionate about! If you're planning to attend ApacheCON in Seville please read through this and let us know (on the wiki or replying to t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating

The last statement should have said: Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Geode 1.0.0-incubating (rather than 1.0.0-incubating.M1). On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Swapnil Bawaskar wrote: > Hello, > > This is a call for a vote on the Apache Geode (incubating) release > 1.0.0-incuba

[VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating

Hello, This is a call for a vote on the Apache Geode (incubating) release 1.0.0-incubating. This release candidate, 1.0.0-incubating.RC2, has successfully passed a vote for a release on the geode developer mailing list. Vote thread: http://markmail.org/message/bjj6aumdkwsmaw2p Results: http:/