Hello,
The IPMC vote passes.
The IPMC vote thread is here:
http://markmail.org/thread/skg4ttfwjhbq6wc5
Summary:
4 (binding) [+4]
0 [<= 0]
The following binding +1 votes were received:
- Ate Douma
- Matt Franklin
- Suneel Marthi
- Justin Mclean
Thanks,
Steve Blackmon
sblack...@apache.org
On Se
Hey Justin
Here is the Dockerfile and build commands I used to test the release with
which gave me a successful build for the Apache HTrace (incubating)
4.2.0-rc0 release candidate
-Jake
[INFO] Apache HTrace . SUCCESS
[2:49.326s]
[INFO] htrace-c ..
Hi,
+1 binding
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE good
- All source files have ASF headers
- No unexpected binaries in source
- Can compile from source
Convenience binary also looks good.
You may want to consider adding
Hi,
+1 binding but i did have a bit of trouble building from source
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signature and hashes good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE good
- All ASF file have ASF headers
- No unexpected binary files
- manage to compile on OSX
IMO It would be best if build inst
Dear IPMC,
Please vote for the following release candidate of Apache Fluo
1.0.0-incubating.
PPMC vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8b6ec5f17e277ed2d01e8df61eb1f1f42266cd30b9e114cb431c1c17@%3Cdev.fluo.apache.org%3E
Staged dist artifacts:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incu
Hi,
+0 binding as I had issues compiling (see below). Happy to change to +1 if I
can compile everything else is good.
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signature and hashes good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE is missing MIT licensed normalise.css bundled in several bootstrap
files. e.g. [2]. Ple
+1
-Jake
Checks:
- No unexpected binary file
- Name contains incubating
- Valid signatures and hashes
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE up to date
- ASF headers for all source files
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Mike Drob wrote:
> Resending this after being told that I used an inco
+1, release contents look good.
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 5:49 AM Thomas Draier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Unomi community has voted again for the release of Apache Unomi 1.1.0
> (incubating). Previous issue with license has been fixed, the dependency to
> lgpl library has been removed.
>
> The vote
Hi,
+1 binding
Checked for the source release:
- name contains incubating
- signatures and hashes good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE good
- NOTICE stills contains unneeded info re MIT licensed code [1]. While this is
a minor documentation issue please remove in the next release. Notice files
sh
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 1:16 PM Mike Drob wrote:
> Resending this after being told that I used an incorrect subject format.
>
> On 2016-09-29 21:20 (-0500), "Mike Drob" wrote:
> > Dear IPMC, please vote on our latest release candidate as an Apache
> Incubator project.
> >
> > Apache
Hi,
> This (an another couple of things in your review) might stay the same
> in the next release, but be allowed (as I read it) under the licensing
> rules.
As long as it not compile source files it should be fine. It's not not binary
files i.e. jpg and pngs and the like are ok. What does conta
I think the community behind this proposal is ready to accept defeat at this
point. With DataStax' objection, the project simply can't be brought under the
auspices of the ASF unless DataStax reverses its stance.
Personally, I'm somewhat discouraged to see a company I once held in high
regard i
Thanks to all participating.
Due to response from Datastax legal rep, this proposal at this moment
considered "hostile" fork and hence no longer open for discussion.
- Henry
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Henry Saputra
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Please find below a proposal for a new incubator po
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Gino Bustelo wrote:
> Just wanted to announce that the Apache Toree team was able to work with
> the JeroMQ (https://github.com/zeromq/jeromq) team to get their library
> relicensed as MPL v2. This is a key milestone for the Toree project, as it
> allow us to prod
+1 Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator
On 2016-09-27 16:30 (-0400), Ate Douma wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Now that the discussion thread on the NetBeans Proposal has ended,
> > please vote on accepting NetBeans into the Apache Incubator.
> >
> > The ASF voting rules are described at:
>
Hi IPMC,
HAWQ community has voted and passed RC4 build. Previous IP issues have all
been fixed.
The Vote thread can be found:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-hawq-dev/201609.mbox/%3CCABJ%3DBRr4xY_J0AY6Jfdvzd_uyOQAsEr9UrF6chOnRy2dEGMwmQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E
This is the 1st relea
+1 binding
Verified signatures & hashes
Verified compiles from source
Verified LICENSE & NOTICE
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 4:43 AM Suneel Marthi wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> Checked:
>
> 1. Signatures and hashes are correct
> 2. Compiles from source
> 3. Verified Apache headers
> 4. License and Notice
On 30 September 2016 at 11:39, Jim Apple wrote:
> Thank you for the review, Justin. I have changed the subject so as not
> to clutter the VOTE thread.
>
> > - One possible binary file that shouldn’t be in the source release? [15]
> (not sure what this is)
>
> This (an another couple of things in
Resending this after being told that I used an incorrect subject format.
On 2016-09-29 21:20 (-0500), "Mike Drob" wrote:
> Dear IPMC, please vote on our latest release candidate as an Apache Incubator
> project.
>
> Apache HTrace (incubating), has voted to release the below referenced Apache
>
Let's try this again (using lists.apache.org):
+1 (binding)
On 2016-09-27 16:30 (-0400), Ate Douma wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Now that the discussion thread on the NetBeans Proposal has ended,
> please vote on accepting NetBeans into the Apache Incubator.
>
> The ASF voting rules are descr
Thank you for the review, Justin. I have changed the subject so as not
to clutter the VOTE thread.
> - One possible binary file that shouldn’t be in the source release? [15] (not
> sure what this is)
This (an another couple of things in your review) might stay the same
in the next release, but b
Hi Carl - is this a +1 to the release or to Tom's note about
Strata/Hadoop World?
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Carl Steinbach wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
>
>> Hey Jim,
>>
>> Just a quick note: I think several of the mentors (myself included) might
>>
On Friday 30 September 2016, Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
> 28. 9. 2016 v 11:25, Greg Stein >:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Jaroslav Tulach <
> jaroslav.tul...@gmail.com
> >> wrote:
> >> ...
> >
> >> One idea that keeps puzzling in my mind is to reuse central Maven
> >> repository
> >> more
As Shane points out, such "Special exceptions" would in theory be good
enough for an open source project, but it restricts commercial
downstream users beyond the ASF license (which gives them the
"freedom" to NOT distribute the source)
https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved#category-x
However you
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 7:39 PM, jag wrote:
> +1 (expressing unbridled enthusiasm and glee!!)
Note: The above is James Gosling. :-)
- Gj
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 7:39 PM, jag wrote:
> +1 (expressing unbridled enthusiasm and glee!!)
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-in
Hi all,
The Unomi community has voted again for the release of Apache Unomi 1.1.0
(incubating). Previous issue with license has been fixed, the dependency to
lgpl library has been removed.
The vote thread can be found at :
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201609.mbox/%
+1 (expressing unbridled enthusiasm and glee!!)
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Accept-NetBeans-into-the-Apache-Incubator-tp51613p51725.html
Sent from the Apache Incubator - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I think Apache should not take an active part in any forks, as it could
ruin the long-standing approval with the commercial community.
However I think going the Jenkins fork route is the way for these
communities that want to move forward:
Move to GitHub, change the name & logo, clean up IP, acti
+1 binding
Checked:
1. Signatures and hashes are correct
2. Compiles from source
3. Verified Apache headers
4. License and Notice files are good
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 1:13 AM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
>
> Everything checked as pre previous email.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
>
I like the re-licensing threat get it forked on github and prove to
them there is a willing community out there!
Tom
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 4:17 AM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
> I'd leave it open for now. I imagine/hope there are enough people aware of
> this thread that the sentiments express
The Apache BatchEE and Incubator teams are pleased to announce the release
of Apache BatchEE 0.4-incubating.
The release passes the JBatch 1.0 TCK test 1.1-b03.
Sources are available on Apache download area (
https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/incubator/batchee) accessible through
BatchEE site
28. 9. 2016 v 11:25, Greg Stein :
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Jaroslav Tulach > wrote:
>> ...
>
>> One idea that keeps puzzling in my mind is to reuse central Maven
>> repository
>> more than we used to. If I understand correctly while the Maven central is
>> operated by Sonatype, it is j
32 matches
Mail list logo
