We are pleased to announce that Jean-Baptiste Onofré has agreed to provide
additional mentorship to the Apache Gearpump project [incubating].
Jean-Baptiste is active in many Apache projects including Apache Beam
[incubating] and we're very excited to partake in his future suggestions
and guidance (
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 6:49 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> I've recently had an inquiry from a former Sun employee who
> used to hack on NetBeans way back when: how was the list
> of initial committers determined? Or more importantly, if he
> wants to be added to that list up-front would that be O
Hi!
I've recently had an inquiry from a former Sun employee who
used to hack on NetBeans way back when: how was the list
of initial committers determined? Or more importantly, if he
wants to be added to that list up-front would that be OK?
Thanks,
Roman.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:40 AM, Geertja
As I understand things, the licensing information you provide in your
artifacts should reflect everything contained within that artifact. You do
not need to provide license/notice information for dependencies which are
not bundled in your artifact.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:01 PM Donald Szeto wro
On 9/20/16, 11:50 AM, "Donald Szeto" wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I am preparing my first Apache release and am wondering if I need to check
>licenses of all transitive deps if the release contains:
>
>- a single source tarball;
>- a few binary JAR artifacts on Nexus that contain no transitive deps in
>e
Sorry. I should have mentioned that I am preparing a release for
PredictionIO.
Regards,
Donald
On Tuesday, September 20, 2016, Donald Szeto wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am preparing my first Apache release and am wondering if I need to check
> licenses of all transitive deps if the release contains:
Hi all,
I am preparing my first Apache release and am wondering if I need to check
licenses of all transitive deps if the release contains:
- a single source tarball;
- a few binary JAR artifacts on Nexus that contain no transitive deps in
either binary or source form.
Would it be sufficient to
[ X ] +1 Accept Spot into the Apache Incubator
Jarcec
> On Sep 20, 2016, at 11:15 AM, Doug Cutting wrote:
>
> Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a vote on
> accepting Spot into the Apache Incubator.
>
> [] +1 Accept Spot into the Apache Incubator
> [] +0 Abstain.
> [] -1 Do
Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a vote on
accepting Spot into the Apache Incubator.
[] +1 Accept Spot into the Apache Incubator
[] +0 Abstain.
[] -1 Do not accept Spot into the Apache Incubator because ...
This vote will run for the usual 72 hours.
The proposal is attached,
Perfect, thanks John.
Bruce
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:31 AM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> Sorry Bruce, just got to it now. You should have access.
>
> John
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 7:54 AM Bruce Snyder
> wrote:
>
> > Hi John,
> >
> > Did you add me to the ContributorsGroup yet? I'm still seeing
Sorry Bruce, just got to it now. You should have access.
John
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 7:54 AM Bruce Snyder wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Did you add me to the ContributorsGroup yet? I'm still seeing the following
> page as ImmutablePage:
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/RocketMQProposal
>
> Bruce
Hi John,
Did you add me to the ContributorsGroup yet? I'm still seeing the following
page as ImmutablePage:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/RocketMQProposal
Bruce
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Bruce Snyder
wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> My username for MoinMoin is BruceSnyder.
>
> Bruce
>
> On M
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Mark Struberg
wrote:
> git clone of the Linus' repo takes 3 minutes.
>
> The hg clone of netbeans took 5 HOURS!
>
> Also checking out all the files or swapping branches in the git repo takes
> about 45 seconds in GIT, but much longer in hg.
>
> The repo s
Le 19/09/16 à 20:50, cowwoc a écrit :
> Mark Struberg-2 wrote
>> Linux never was on hg, so the comparison doesn't fit.
>>
>> To be more clear: I'm not concerned that GIT cannot handle the NetBeans
>> repo size.
> I actually concerned by this. A client I work for has a large Git repo. I
> doubt its
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 8:50 PM, cowwoc wrote:
> ...Out of curiosity, is there a reason that Apache projects can't use
> Mercurial?...
As the ASF doesn't have infinite resources, we have to stop somewhere.
Currently svn and Git are supported, and Git is what's being asked for
in https://wi
>
> git clone of the Linus' repo takes 3 minutes.
>
> The hg clone of netbeans took 5 HOURS!
>
This is surely dependent on the network and the server the git/hg client
talks to.
> The repo size is 3.6GB. But it contains many binaries which we could
> probably strip off.
> I really don't like to
git clone of the Linus' repo takes 3 minutes.
The hg clone of netbeans took 5 HOURS!
Also checking out all the files or swapping branches in the git repo takes
about 45 seconds in GIT, but much longer in hg.
The repo size is 3.6GB. But it contains many binaries which we could probably
strip of
Mark Struberg-2 wrote
> Linux never was on hg, so the comparison doesn't fit.
>
> To be more clear: I'm not concerned that GIT cannot handle the NetBeans
> repo size.
I actually concerned by this. A client I work for has a large Git repo. I
doubt its size is anywhere close to the Linux repo, but
Hello,
Infra have done a lot of the work on this now. They needed an ASF email
address to act as the release manager so I have used mine. We'll see how it
goes.
Cheers,
Ian
On 16 September 2016 at 09:43, Ian Dunlop wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks for all the advice. I have created https://issues.a
19 matches
Mail list logo
