On 9/17/16, 8:54 AM, "Jochen Theodorou" wrote:
>On 17.09.2016 10:23, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
>> Nightly builds is all that's needed, indeed, no one needs to announce
>>them,
>> they should simply be available. Agreed it's important to distinguish
>> between nightly builds and official releases
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Frank McQuillan wrote:
>
> Hello Incubator PMC,
>
> The Apache MADlib (incubating) community has voted on and approved the
> proposal to release MADlib v1.9.1-rc2.
>
> The voting result is available at:
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-madlib-de
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Can we be specific about what info is needed, or what further details
> specifically, before going into a vote for acceptance of the proposal? My
> concern is that each question we answer is answered by further questions to
>
On 17.09.2016 10:23, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
Nightly builds is all that's needed, indeed, no one needs to announce them,
they should simply be available. Agreed it's important to distinguish
between nightly builds and official releases, that's exactly how NetBeans
works currently. The #1 require
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 11:14 AM Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Geertjan Wielenga
> wrote:
> > ...Can we be specific about what info is needed, or what further details
> > specifically, before going into a vote for acceptance of the proposal?...
>
> Unless
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> ...Seeing as no one else from that PMC chimed in, I guess I'll be the
> punching bag here, Bertrand :) Count me in
Looking forward to that ;-)
I have added you as a mentor to
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NetBeansProposal
-Bertrand
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> ...Can we be specific about what info is needed, or what further details
> specifically, before going into a vote for acceptance of the proposal?...
Unless I missed something I see only David Nalley, speaking has VP
infra, who has r
Hi all,
Can we be specific about what info is needed, or what further details
specifically, before going into a vote for acceptance of the proposal? My
concern is that each question we answer is answered by further questions to
answer. Maybe we could do a phone conference with the NetBeans
infrast
Actually, I think a nightly build artifact would only be supported via
Jenkins. Travis can upload to things like nexus, but I don't believe we
publish our credentials outside of the environment.
This may also be a use case for jenkins pipelines, to orchestrate the build
steps required programmati
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> ...The #1 requirement here is that there should be nightly
> builds and that is supported, from your response here...
Yes, definitely, for that there's at least Jenkins at
https://builds.apache.org/ and Travis,
https://blogs.apache.org/
Nightly builds is all that's needed, indeed, no one needs to announce them,
they should simply be available. Agreed it's important to distinguish
between nightly builds and official releases, that's exactly how NetBeans
works currently. The #1 requirement here is that there should be nightly
builds
11 matches
Mail list logo
