That goes into a direction I was about to ask anyway, the development model:
Is it CTR (commit-then-review) or RTC (review-then-commit).
Means do committers directly push to the cannonical repo master branch and
before doing a release there is a manual stabilisation phase? Or do you only
apply
Transferring my +1 from dev vote here.
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Poorna Chandra wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.9.0-incubating,
> release candidate 1. This is the second release of Tephra.
>
> Apache Tephra community has voted and approved the
Hi all,
This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.9.0-incubating,
release candidate 1. This is the second release of Tephra.
Apache Tephra community has voted and approved the release.
Vote thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-dev/201609.mbox/%3CCAC9o21R
Of the 32 repos in Mercurial, not all are active. We assume we'll have
Git-style development under Apache, with pull requests. That is, however, a
different working/infrastructure style than we have had in Oracle, with
parallel integration (http://wiki.netbeans.org/HgParallelProjectIntegration).
Th
Thanks. Contacting him.
More info, this time statistics:
Total Physical Source Lines of Code = 8,281,256
Total Number of Files = 64927
Thanks,
Geertjan:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 1:22 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Geertjan Wielenga
> wrote:
> > Notes on the NetB
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> Notes on the NetBeans infrastructure from the NetBeans build engineer. Who
> from Apache infra is going to do 1:1 discovery?
Daniel Gruno will - feel free to reach out directly to him at
humbed...@apache.org
In the meantime, this is a g
I'm sure the physical machines themselves will not be donated. But the
space on them might, i.e., we could decide that some of the artifacts
should stay where they are. The source code, i.e., the active Mercurial
repos, should move to Apache Git, mirrored on Apache GitHub, ideally. The
process will
Sorry for top posting (phone), but of the machines listed, are any
available to be migrated or donated to the ASF? Or expected to be?
Mac builds is an interesting topic on this as well.
On Sep 15, 2016 6:36 PM, "Geertjan Wielenga" <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Notes on the NetBea
Notes on the NetBeans infrastructure from the NetBeans build engineer. Who
from Apache infra is going to do 1:1 discovery?
Public servers:
- www.netbeans.org: The core of the netbeans.org project, as well as user
management, bugzilla, and mailing lists.
- hg.netbeans.org: 1 VM with 32 Mercurial re
Mitch Claborn wrote on 9/15/16 11:07 AM:
> I'm very new in this type of thing. I have zero experience with ASF,
> etc, so if this is out of line, please forgive and I'll keep silent.
>
> I've seen a lot of discussion about the HOW in terms of moving NetBeans
> to the Apache project, but not much/a
David Nalley wrote on 9/15/16 11:28 AM:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 8:15 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>> Hi Incubator PMC,
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
>> wrote:
>>> ... https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NetBeansProposal ...
>>
>> At this point I ask anyone with conc
Thanks a lot for the input, Leonardo! Great to have you part of the future
Apache NetBeans community. :-)
Gj
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 8:51 PM, Leonardo Loch Zanivan
wrote:
> As a NetBeans community contributor and plugin maker, I'll try to clarify
> some points about how plugins work on NetBeans
As a NetBeans community contributor and plugin maker, I'll try to clarify
some points about how plugins work on NetBeans and how they're important.
1. Plugins can either upload a binary (NBM) or just an advertisement (with
link to another site)
2. Plugins that upload a binary (NBM) can be downloa
As a NetBeans community contributor and plugin maker, I'll try to clarify
some points about how plugins work on NetBeans and how they're important.
1. Plugins can either upload a binary (NBM) or just an advertisement (with
link to another site)
2. Plugins that upload a binary (NBM) can be downloa
I think one-on-one discovery would indeed be good -- not sure how that
progresses from here, though I can put you in touch directly with the
NetBeans build engineers who will be able to provide all the missing info.
[And, again, this is precisely one big benefit of NetBeans in Apache: we
will have
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Mitch Claborn wrote:
> ...I've seen a lot of discussion about the HOW in terms of moving NetBeans to
> the Apache project, but not much/any discussion about WHY
The "why" is that the current NetBeans owner (Oracle) has expressed a
desire to move it here,
Very glad to see this proposal!
On 13 Sep 2016 8:40 a.m., "Geertjan Wielenga" <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> Attached to this message is a proposed new project - Apache NetBeans, a
> development environment, tooling platform, and application framework.
> == Sou
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 8:15 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi Incubator PMC,
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
> wrote:
>> ... https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NetBeansProposal ...
>
> At this point I ask anyone with concerns or questions that haven't
> been addressed so
Yes, I think this is outside the scope of this discussion. The WHY is
defined clearly: netbeans.org/community/apache-incubator.html
Feel free to drop me a mail off-thread about this.
Gj
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Mitch Claborn wrote:
> I'm very new in this type of thing. I have zero expe
I'm very new in this type of thing. I have zero experience with ASF,
etc, so if this is out of line, please forgive and I'll keep silent.
I've seen a lot of discussion about the HOW in terms of moving NetBeans
to the Apache project, but not much/any discussion about WHY. I'm not a
NetBeans cod
Yes, the timing is quite good, given what's happening with Kenai. I imagine
that everything will transfer from NetBeans to Apache in stages, as
outlined near the start/middle of this thread. Indeed, plugins.netbeans.org
would be one of the last things to migrate, though many solutions are
imaginabl
On 2016-09-15 14:15, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi Incubator PMC,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
... https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NetBeansProposal ...
At this point I ask anyone with concerns or questions that haven't
been addressed so far and would prevent us
On 09/15/2016 02:15 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi Incubator PMC,
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
> wrote:
>> ... https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NetBeansProposal ...
>
> At this point I ask anyone with concerns or questions that haven't
> been addressed so far and
It really does sound like these licensing and distribution concerns can be
solved in one way or another. Also, from the NetBeans side, we're going to
do everything we can to fit into the most optimal Apache approach to
structuring our infrastructure under Apache. We want to end up in a
situation wh
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Wade Chandler wrote:
> NetBeans has installers, and those installers inevitably bake in some things.
> ATM they provide both Tomcat and
> Glassfish. I assume that could be changed to TomEE or what ever, but would
> like to know what limits to bundling
> of v
On Sep 15, 2016, at 08:15, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
> Hi Incubator PMC,
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
> wrote:
>> ... https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NetBeansProposal ...
>
> At this point I ask anyone with concerns or questions that haven't
> been addressed so f
Hi Incubator PMC,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> ... https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NetBeansProposal ...
At this point I ask anyone with concerns or questions that haven't
been addressed so far and would prevent us from voting on this
proposal to chime in.
Based
Hi David,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 5:14 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> ...While it may not be a requirement to enter incubation, I do want us to
> understand plugins.netbeans.org (and any other pieces of their
> infrastructure)...
> ...I think this is similar to Maven Central - yes, we license maven
>
Technically NetBeans is both an RCP, first technically, and an IDE, so it
is a library, and an application, but no, there is no separate TCK. All the
tests are in the build infrastructure you get when you clone the
repository. There are some infrastructure things which the community uses
to validat
I don't personally have any products using the name necessarily. I do have
a plugin that uses the word NetBeans as part of its name, but it is only
used in NetBeans, and freely available in the portal, but is the only one,
and could be renamed if plugins also have this restriction; may impact
other
30 matches
Mail list logo
