On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Mike Jumper wrote:
> On Aug 28, 2016 5:58 PM, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote:
>>
>> First of all, the way apache org is setup on GitHub make me 99% sure
>> that the only artifacts allowed there would be release ones.
>>
>> If we agree on that, I see no problem with
>>
On Aug 28, 2016 5:58 PM, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote:
>
> First of all, the way apache org is setup on GitHub make me 99% sure
> that the only artifacts allowed there would be release ones.
>
> If we agree on that, I see no problem with
>apache/incubator-foo
> naming of your *released* Docker ima
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 8:58 PM Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> First of all, the way apache org is setup on GitHub make me 99% sure
> that the only artifacts allowed there would be release ones.
>
> If we agree on that, I see no problem with
>apache/incubator-foo
> naming of your *released* Docker
First of all, the way apache org is setup on GitHub make me 99% sure
that the only artifacts allowed there would be release ones.
If we agree on that, I see no problem with
apache/incubator-foo
naming of your *released* Docker images.
Note that there was a separate discussion focused on where
Hello all,
We, Apache Guacamole (incubating), would like to migrate our project's
Docker images to something beneath the ASF, but I am unsure how to
proceed, nor the form that this migration would best take.
We currently have two repositories which provide Docker images:
incubator-guacamole-clien
