+1 (binding)
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
> +1 from me!
>
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:23 AM Daniel Gruno
> wrote:
>
> > Obviously a binding +1 from me :)
> >
> > With regards,
> > Daniel.
> >
> > On 08/08/2016 09:41 PM, Benjamin Young wrote:
> > > Hi all!
> > >
> >
Hi all, can you grant karma to "PhilSorber" to edit the incubator
wiki?
Thanks.
We're still missing sign off from Slider and TrafficControl.
TrafficControl's MLs don't seem to work yet, as a result this email
includes the mentors directly.
John
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 10:00 PM John D. Ament wrote:
> All,
>
> Below is the current draft of the IPMC board report.
>
> We're sti
This vote passes with +3 (johndament, jmclean, elserj), and no -1.
Thanks all!
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 4:27 PM Christopher wrote:
> Just a quick reminder about this vote, which expires tomorrow. So far,
> there are +3
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 1:38 PM Josh Elser wrote:
>
>> Forwarding my (bi
+1 from me!
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:23 AM Daniel Gruno wrote:
> Obviously a binding +1 from me :)
>
> With regards,
> Daniel.
>
> On 08/08/2016 09:41 PM, Benjamin Young wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > Thanks for everyone who's contributed to the discussion around the
> Apache Annotator proposal:
>
Obviously a binding +1 from me :)
With regards,
Daniel.
On 08/08/2016 09:41 PM, Benjamin Young wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Thanks for everyone who's contributed to the discussion around the Apache
> Annotator proposal:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AnnotatorProposal
>
> From what our Champion t
On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 19:41:29 +
Benjamin Young wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Thanks for everyone who's contributed to the discussion around the
> Apache Annotator proposal:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AnnotatorProposal
>
> From what our Champion tells me, we're now ready to go to a vote!
>
>
Thanks Billie and Taylor,
We've got https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-297 opened to
address this.
Thanks again,
-David..
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 2:05 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Checked:
> - signatures
> - “incubating” in filename
> - ALv2 license headers
> - bui
+1 (binding)
Checked:
- signatures
- “incubating” in filename
- ALv2 license headers
- build from source
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENCE and NOTICE look okay
As Billie mentioned, the license issue for the STIX extractor code still needs
to be addressed. Can you add a lira for that and correct it i
+1 binding
verified signatures and checksums
file name contains incubating
disclaimer is correct
L&N look good
tarball matches the tag
build successful
For the next release, please look into the issue that Justin brought up on
RC2:
"For the license I think this file [1] may incorrectly have an apa
> On Aug 9, 2016, at 4:46 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>
> Personally, I feel like those types of files definitely need to be
> included in the SGA.
> After all, Pivotal did own the modifications on top of the pristine PG
> source and it is
> important for the company to explicitly signal dona
11 matches
Mail list logo
