Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- release contains incubating
- signatures and hashes good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE OK
- Most files has ASF headers
- No unexpected binaries in release
- Can compile from source
Minor issues:
- year is wrong in NOTICE file
- year range in site footed d
+1 as well
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Jakob Homan wrote:
> +1 (binding) (carrying my vote over from the podling thread)
>
> -Jakob
>
>
> On 21 July 2016 at 10:55, Matthew Hayes wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The Apache DataFu community has voted on and approved the release of
> Apache
> > Da
+1 (binding) (carrying my vote over from the podling thread)
-Jakob
On 21 July 2016 at 10:55, Matthew Hayes wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Apache DataFu community has voted on and approved the release of Apache
> DataFu 1.3.1 (incubating):
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-datafu
Hi all,
The Apache DataFu community has voted on and approved the release of Apache
DataFu 1.3.1 (incubating):
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-datafu-dev/201607.mbox/%3CCAA4Vo8AQ_gbDvvVN49LcU%3DgdneSnjyc%2Bd%2BrfNd2u5imJUxBJUQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E
Results:
4 binding +1 votes
No
Good thought, Bertrand! I'll clear that up in a revision soon.
AnnotatorJS's code actually pre-dates (and is in part the reason for) the W3C's
Annotation Working Group (which I'm a part of fwiw). Now that we've got a
handful of specs out the door (much of it based on the influence of this code),
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 9:26 PM, Benjamin Young wrote:
> ... https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AnnotatorProposal
> Please let me know your thoughts on this proposal,...
Looks like a nice project with a diverse community and very experienced mentors!
As a nitpick, I had to read more than hal
