Re: [VOTE] Release: Apache Eagle 0.4.0-incubating

+1 (binding) So far I've checked: signatures and digests, source releases file layouts, matched git tags and commit ids, incubator suffix and disclaimer, NOTICE and LICENSE files, license headers, build sources in a clean environment (Maven 3.3.9, OpenJDK 1.8.0_91 64-Bit, Debian amd64). On Thu,

Re: [VOTE] Release: Apache Eagle 0.4.0-incubating

Thank you John, I've logged your suggestions to my TODO list of the next release vote. BTW, do you mean in this sentence "Your PPMC vote includes some IPMC binding votes", I should count Julian's vote as IPMC vote and not listed in PPMC +1 group? On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 7:30 AM, John D. Ament wro

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC3

Thanks Ted, Justin. Your comments provide a reassuring backdrop to those of us in gearpump which are new to the voting process.We've made the corrections as suggested and will get 0.8.1-RC4 out in a timely manner. Kam On Monday, July 18, 2016 9:32 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: Hi, Thanks

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC3

Hi, Thanks Ted for a friendly explanation of all that. > Typically what happens in a smooth functioning project is that if somebody > points out a heinous problem (forgot to include the source code in a source > release, say), everybody (or nearly everybody) who previously voted +1 will > immedia

Re: [VOTE] Release: Apache Eagle 0.4.0-incubating

+1 Release contents look good. A few nit-picks (in addition to what Justin pointed out): - Your email uses many variables instead of the real links. - Your email doesn't include a link to the PPMC vote. - Your PPMC vote includes some IPMC binding votes - Your key is not in the repo's keys file: h

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC3

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > 4. Veto rule differences (or lack thereof) within the general@ voting > vs dev@ voting > > Releases can not be vetoed [3], a -1 is not a veto. 3 +1 are required and > more +1s than -1s. Typically what happens in a smooth functioning proj

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC3

Hi, > 1. A tie (and if the voting period will be extended when a tie occurs) Would not pass. For a release you need at least 3 +1 binding votes and more +1 votes than -1 votes. [1] > .2. Less than the required number of votes (+3 and how this will extend the > voting period) The vote lasts un

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC3

Thanks John, Craig and Ted for weighing in on this matter. I wasn't clear about a few of the rules related to voting including: 1. A tie (and if the voting period will be extended when a tie occurs).2. Less than the required number of votes (+3 and how this will extend the voting period)3. Whethe

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC3

> On Jul 18, 2016, at 8:43 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:20 AM Ted Dunning wrote: > >> A RESULT can still be given when the vote is cancelled. To my mind, the >> major purpose of the CANCEL is to shorten the vote period so that the next >> vote on the next iteration o

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC3

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:20 AM Ted Dunning wrote: > A RESULT can still be given when the vote is cancelled. To my mind, the > major purpose of the CANCEL is to shorten the vote period so that the next > vote on the next iteration of the release candidate can start immediately > without confusio

Re: Add committer to podling

Flavio, It should just be an incubator LDAP change. On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: > Hello! > > I'm wondering what the right way is to add committers to a podling with a > git repository. According to this page, we add them to the incubator ldap > group: > > http://

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC3

A RESULT can still be given when the vote is cancelled. To my mind, the major purpose of the CANCEL is to shorten the vote period so that the next vote on the next iteration of the release candidate can start immediately without confusion. On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Craig Russell wrote:

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC3

Hi John, Given the state of Apache documented processes, I think it was perfectly fine to close this vote with a RESULT. I was not confused after reading >>> We will correct the noted problems and submit a 0.8.1-RC4. Recognizing that this document is (still!) in draft status http://incubator.

Re: Add committer to podling

Hey John, depending on the help you are looking for, I may can give a hand. Let me know your plan and the things you like to improve. Cheers Markus On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 1:36 PM +0200, "John D. Ament" mailto:johndam...@apache.org>> wrote: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#wh

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.6.0 (incubating) - rc1

Incubator PMC, The vote has passed with 6 “+1” votes from IPMC members and no “0” or “-1” votes. +1 (binding): - Joe Witt - Josh Elser - Alan Gates - Julian Hyde - Luciano Resende - Colm O hEigeartaigh (voted +1 on Dev thread) +0: None -1: None I will proceed with official release. Thank y

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC3

ASF votes don't complete in 72 hours unless the required binding votes are placed. In this case you did not get +3 binding votes (you got +2 and -2, which yields 0). Its not clear from this email whether you're saying the vote has passed or not. Usually when a vote does not pass, the person init

Re: Add committer to podling

http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#who-auth-karma This section seems to only refer to websites, and would only be true for SVN based websites hosted under incubator. Most websites are either standalone in SVN or slowly moving to git. You would need Ted or another VP to add someone to

Re: [VOTE] Release: Apache Eagle 0.4.0-incubating

+1 (binding) - LICENSE, NOTICE files look good - Hash files look good - Signature file looks good - DISCLAIMER looks good - No exe binaries in source artifacts - Henry On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 7:11 AM, Michael Wu wrote: > Hi all, > > This is the incubator release of Apache Eagle, version 0.4.0

Re: [VOTE] Release: Apache Eagle 0.4.0-incubating

Forwarding my vote from the dev list: +1 (binding) Since Michael didn’t include it in his message, here’s a link to the result of the vote on the dev list: https://s.apache.org/3I2d Julian > On Jul 18, 2016, at 12:27 AM, Michael Wu wrote: > > Hi IPMC, > > Could you please give your judgeme

Re: [VOTE] Release: Apache Eagle 0.4.0-incubating

Hi IPMC, Could you please give your judgement on this vote? Thanks a lot! Currently, the vote has last for more than 72 hours, and seems that only Justin Mclean replied it with "+1 (binding)". Considering the time range of this vote includes a weekend, we'd like to lengthen 48 hours for People to

Add committer to podling

Hello! I'm wondering what the right way is to add committers to a podling with a git repository. According to this page, we add them to the incubator ldap group: http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#karma-podling but I wanted to confirm because