Thanks Ted.
FYI, "Apache Trafodion" is part of the logo. I'm not putting the project
through another round of voting on that one. :)
It strikes me that the left (or right) part of a project's web site menu
could contain "Apache Incubator Project" as a standard. Such an approach
wouldn't impede we
Suggestion; If such new Incubator logo is to be incorporated on podling
sites, could it also be standardized to have a "hover popup" containing the
standard text and possibly links to further information (both
Incubator-specific as well as podling-specific)?
Cheers
Niclas
On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 1
Gunnar,
Think that page looks pretty good (not referring to the standards, just
looking at the page).
Having the word incubator near the logo might be slightly nicer, but that
isn't such a big deal since you have that on the project name just above
the logo and you have the Incubator logo in the
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:42 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:23 PM Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:06 PM, John D. Ament
>> wrote:
>> > All,
>> >
>> > As a follow up to the current discussions happening, I wanted to get
>> > opinions from the IPMC on wh
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> Sounds just right to me.
>
> I just spend a few minutes going through incubator sites. The number of
> sites that had the incubator logo was definitely less in my cursory
> examination than the number that made it clear that they were incubating
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Joe Witt wrote:
>>> Is this what you're looking for
>>>
>>>http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list
>>
>> That's the
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:23 PM Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:06 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > As a follow up to the current discussions happening, I wanted to get
> > opinions from the IPMC on whether or not the Incubator logo should be
> > included in podling
Sounds just right to me.
I just spend a few minutes going through incubator sites. The number of
sites that had the incubator logo was definitely less in my cursory
examination than the number that made it clear that they were incubating,
but the number of sites that didn't make it incubation stat
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Joe Witt wrote:
>> Is this what you're looking for
>>
>>http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list
>
> That's the MPV check list ;-) but I thought we had a much more expanded on
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:06 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> As a follow up to the current discussions happening, I wanted to get
> opinions from the IPMC on whether or not the Incubator logo should be
> included in podling websites.
Here's how I would summarize the spirit of the policy:
1. It should
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:06 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> All,
>
> As a follow up to the current discussions happening, I wanted to get
> opinions from the IPMC on whether or not the Incubator logo should be
> included in podling websites.
>
> Take https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BrandingAuditJune2
Hi,
Perhaps this is what you are looking for?
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/release.html
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apa
Hi,
> As a follow up to the current discussions happening, I wanted to get
> opinions from the IPMC on whether or not the Incubator logo should be
> included in podling websites.
+1 It gives a clear indication that the project is under incubation at the ASF.
Bonus points for it linking to somewh
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Tim Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:43 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>> Mike,
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:12 PM Mike Jumper wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Gunnar Tapper
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Let me offer up a concrete example since I str
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 5:39 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Some notes, but again only my opinion.
>
> <3
>
> My only nit pick with the disclaimer placement is that its even below your
> normal footer. The more appropriate place is the about section on the home
> page. My interpretation is that this
All,
As a follow up to the current discussions happening, I wanted to get
opinions from the IPMC on whether or not the Incubator logo should be
included in podling websites.
Take https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BrandingAuditJune2016 as a summary
of podling status.
29 podlings presently show th
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:43 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Mike,
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:12 PM Mike Jumper wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Gunnar Tapper
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Let me offer up a concrete example since I struggle with the issue of
>> > branding: http://trafodion.apache.o
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:38 PM Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 8:47 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:19 PM Greg Chase wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Marvin Humphrey <
> mar...@rectangular.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Ju
Mike,
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:12 PM Mike Jumper wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Gunnar Tapper
> wrote:
>
> > Let me offer up a concrete example since I struggle with the issue of
> > branding: http://trafodion.apache.org/documentation.html
> >
> > I chose the following approach based
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 8:47 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:19 PM Greg Chase wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Marvin Humphrey >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Greg Chase wrote:
> > >
> > > > The branding guidelines do not address feedback
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Gunnar Tapper
wrote:
> Let me offer up a concrete example since I struggle with the issue of
> branding: http://trafodion.apache.org/documentation.html
>
> I chose the following approach based on input from out mentor Stack:
>
> - Added (incubator) to the menu bar
Some notes, but again only my opinion.
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 6:44 PM Gunnar Tapper
wrote:
> Let me offer up a concrete example since I struggle with the issue of
> branding: http://trafodion.apache.org/documentation.html
>
> I chose the following approach based on input from out mentor Stack:
>
Let me offer up a concrete example since I struggle with the issue of
branding: http://trafodion.apache.org/documentation.html
I chose the following approach based on input from out mentor Stack:
- Added (incubator) to the menu bar
- Added the incubator logo on the top of the page
- Placed the di
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 6:13 PM Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Joe Witt wrote:
> > Is this what you're looking for
> >
> >http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list
>
> That's the MPV check list ;-) but I thought we had a much more expanded
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Joe Witt wrote:
> Is this what you're looking for
>
>http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list
That's the MPV check list ;-) but I thought we had a much more expanded one
on a wiki some place. It is totally possible, thought, that I'm
Is this what you're looking for
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I remember we used to have a checklist of things published
> somewhere, but I can't find it anymore? What I'm talking about
>
Hi!
I remember we used to have a checklist of things published
somewhere, but I can't find it anymore? What I'm talking about
is something along the lines of:
signature and hashes good?
DISCLAIMER is good?
NOTICE is good?
LICENSE is good?
incubatin
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:16 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 4:52 PM Greg Chase wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > This email encrypted by tiny buttons & fat thumbs, beta voice
> recognition,
> > and autocorrect on my iPhone.
> >
> > > On Jul 1, 2016, at 1:41 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
> > >
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 1:07 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
> It's ok for a podling to change its name at any time during the
> incubation process, but the earlier the better IMO, by far. If you
> don't get a timely answer to PODLINGNAMESEARCH-105 I suggest starting
> a vote here for renaming t
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 4:52 PM Greg Chase wrote:
>
>
> This email encrypted by tiny buttons & fat thumbs, beta voice recognition,
> and autocorrect on my iPhone.
>
> > On Jul 1, 2016, at 1:41 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 4:35 PM Tim Williams
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri
This email encrypted by tiny buttons & fat thumbs, beta voice recognition, and
autocorrect on my iPhone.
> On Jul 1, 2016, at 1:41 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 4:35 PM Tim Williams wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Marvin Humphrey
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Ju
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 4:35 PM Tim Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Marvin Humphrey
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Greg Chase wrote:
> >
> >> The branding guidelines do not address feedback such as "logo in
> footer" or
> >> "disclaimer is buried deep or below the
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Greg Chase wrote:
>
>> The branding guidelines do not address feedback such as "logo in footer" or
>> "disclaimer is buried deep or below the fold".
>
> Incubation disclaimers are intended to be substantive.
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:47 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:19 PM Greg Chase wrote:
>
> ...
> >
> > Spirits can be hard to grasp. As I suggested before. If being
> > prescriptive is too difficult, then force new podlings into a
> standardized
> > web template that meets re
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:19 PM Greg Chase wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Marvin Humphrey
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Greg Chase wrote:
> >
> > > The branding guidelines do not address feedback such as "logo in
> footer"
> > or
> > > "disclaimer is buried deep or be
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Greg Chase wrote:
>
> > The branding guidelines do not address feedback such as "logo in footer"
> or
> > "disclaimer is buried deep or below the fold".
>
> Incubation disclaimers are intended to be substan
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Greg Chase wrote:
>
> > The branding guidelines do not address feedback such as "logo in footer"
> or
> > "disclaimer is buried deep or below the fold".
>
> What would be best is if podlings just understood
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Greg Chase wrote:
> The branding guidelines do not address feedback such as "logo in footer" or
> "disclaimer is buried deep or below the fold".
Incubation disclaimers are intended to be substantive. They are not CYA legal
boilerplate that can be are buried in fi
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:22 AM, John D. Ament
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Is the status page accurate? Only one added committer and no releases
> while
> >> under incubation?
> >>
> >
> >
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:22 AM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
>> Is the status page accurate? Only one added committer and no releases while
>> under incubation?
>>
>
> Yes, just one added committer so far.
>
> We've had five releases during incub
Hi Nick,
The "name" which I use for loggin in to
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/July2016 page is Nabarun Nag.
Please do let me know if you need any other information.
Regards
Nabarun Nag
*From:* Nick Burch
*Date:* June 30, 2016 at 4:07:03 PM PDT
*To:* general@incubator.apache.org
*Subject:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:22 AM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> Is the status page accurate? Only one added committer and no releases while
> under incubation?
>
Yes, just one added committer so far.
We've had five releases during incubation (3 minor releases with new
features, and two bug-fix releases
The Apache Kudu (incubating) team is happy to announce the release of
Kudu 0.9.1!
Kudu is an open source storage engine for structured data which
supports low-latency random access together with efficient analytical
access patterns. It is designed within the context of the Apache Hadoop
ecosystem
Is the status page accurate? Only one added committer and no releases while
under incubation?
John
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 1:19 PM Jake Farrell wrote:
> A graduation vote has been started for Apache Kudu
>
> -Jake
>
> Graduation vote: https://s.apache.org/5hpx
> Project status page: http://incub
A graduation vote has been started for Apache Kudu
-Jake
Graduation vote: https://s.apache.org/5hpx
Project status page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/kudu.html
Graduation discussion: https://s.apache.org/T8Uj
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:35 PM Greg Chase wrote:
> Thanks for doing the audit.
>
> The Geode PPMC has noted the finding in the wiki with our site.
>
> However, we'd like to see a good example of a compliant website.
>
> The branding guidelines do not address feedback such as "logo in footer" or
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
>
>
> * Although redirections are correctly handled, I'd remove all getkudu.io
> links in the documentation to use the new canonical domain kudu.apache.org
>
> * I noticed you incubating releases are not clearly marked (version suffix)
> at
I had to hop over to Hipchat last week to poke infra about lists for Pirk.
Thankfully, Daniel made some time and knocked it out for me shortly
after asking. Not sure if there is a reason for the delay, but a
light-hand will probably help sort it out :)
John D. Ament wrote:
Sounds like a ques
On 2016-07-01 07:37 (-0700), Shane Curcuru wrote:
>
> In particular, any feedback on our published policies/guidelines is very
> important. As we scale, we need to ensure that most podlings can figure
> out the right thing to do from the docs, and not as much from direct
> pushes by our volun
Thanks for doing the audit.
The Geode PPMC has noted the finding in the wiki with our site.
However, we'd like to see a good example of a compliant website.
The branding guidelines do not address feedback such as "logo in footer" or
"disclaimer is buried deep or below the fold".
Considering the
John D. Ament wrote on 6/29/16 7:36 AM:
> Hey guys
>
> I'm starting to go through the podlings to identify branding issues.
> Touched the first 12 projects, for those that had websites, 4 were not
> within branding requirements.
>
> I'm not sure if other scan give a hand here on contacting podlin
+1
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 8:00 AM Jan van Doorn wrote:
> Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting
> Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator.
>
> [] +1 Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator
> [] +0 Abstain.
> [] -1 Do not accept Traffic Control into t
The Apache Taverna (incubating) team is pleased to announce the release of:
apache-taverna-commandline 3.1.0-incubating
apache-taverna-engine 3.1.0-incubating
apache-taverna-commonactivities 2.1.0-incubating
This is the first major release of Apache Taverna since joining the
Apache Software Foun
Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting
Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator.
[] +1 Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator
[] +0 Abstain.
[] -1 Do not accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator because ...
This vote will be open for at least
Sounds like a question better for infra. They have been through a number
of hiccups this week.
John
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 8:46 AM Flavio Junqueira wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm wondering how long it typically takes infra to create the mailing
> lists for a podling. I have requested the creation
Hi there,
I'm wondering how long it typically takes infra to create the mailing lists for
a podling. I have requested the creation of the lists for the DistributedLog
podling, but I haven't seen any response. We typically receive the notification
via the private list, and how much longer I shou
John,
It seems to me you just defined a (potential) solution direction.
Best regards,
Pierre
On Friday, July 1, 2016, John D. Ament wrote:
> Its definitely an option, once we have a clear sign in place. Just don't
> forget, clutch isn't magic. Unless we build some smarts that can visit the
Its definitely an option, once we have a clear sign in place. Just don't
forget, clutch isn't magic. Unless we build some smarts that can visit the
podling page, look at the webpage and see if the incubator logo are
present, its going to be based on a flag in podlings.xml. I can actually
think o
Hi John, All,
My suggestion is to improve the incubator clutch, so that the overview
http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html reflects whether podlings are:
1. Compliant with ASF Branding regulations
2. Compliant with ASF Incubator Branding regulations.
Best regards,
Pierre Smits
ORRTIZ.
59 matches
Mail list logo
