Re: [VOTE] Accept SensSoft into the Apache Incubator WAS Re: [VOTE] Accept

+1 (binding) On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 1:24 AM, Henry Saputra wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Good luck guys! > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < > lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Title here should be [VOTE] Accept SensSoft into the Apache Incubator > > > > On Mon, Jun 13

[RESULT] WAS Re: [VOTE] Accept SensSoft into the Apache Incubator WAS Re: [VOTE] Accept

Hi general@, 72 hours has come and gone I am therefore closing off this VOTE'ing thread. Thank you to everyone that was able to VOTE. [4] +1 Accept SensSoft into the Apache Incubator Lewis John Mcgibbney* Chris A Mattmann* Tom Barber* Henry Saptura* [0] +/-0 Not overly bothered either way [0] -1

[CANCEL] [VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion 2.0.1 (incubating)

Thanks Justin, John and Pierre for your input. I really appreciate you taking the time to review these packages and for pursuing these issues in both the general and legal forums. The Trafodion community is committed to getting all the legalities correct. I will cancel the vote since Apache Trafo

Re: [VOTE] Accept SensSoft into the Apache Incubator WAS Re: [VOTE] Accept

+1 (binding) Good luck guys! On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Title here should be [VOTE] Accept SensSoft into the Apache Incubator > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < > lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi

Re: [VOTE] Accept SensSoft into the Apache Incubator WAS Re: [VOTE] Accept

Sorry Lewis, I read through it the other day and though I'd replied, clearly not. +1 binding. On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Folks, > The SensSoft proposal needs a bit of TLC from general@ > If software-as-a-sensor, usability test

Re: [VOTE] Accept SensSoft into the Apache Incubator WAS Re: [VOTE] Accept

Hi Folks, The SensSoft proposal needs a bit of TLC from general@ If software-as-a-sensor, usability testing and user characterization are your thing then please consider giving the proposal a read through. At this stage in the game we are looking at obtaining one more binding PPMC VOTE in order to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion 2.0.1 (incubating)

Also note that I started a thread on it [1]. It appears that the source files you're using have been relicensed under the BSD-3-clause, as a result I would recommend switching to those versions. In light of the clarification of Cat-X, I have to change to a -1 due to licensing issues. [1]: https:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion 2.0.1 (incubating)

HI, > Maybe we need clarification from legal? BSD 4 clause is just 3 clause w/ > additional ask to not use UoC to endorse. It seems still in line w/ AL so > I would assume no problems. The 4 clause BSD license is considered category X other than in a couple of cases i.e. OpenSSL where the proje

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion 2.0.1 (incubating)

Hi, > As for the BSD license - the following text was added to the LICENSE file: > > Is there a better way to deal with this issue? That’s a good way to deal with this 4 clause BSD issue, given the large amount of text in the LICENSE I guess I missed that, sorry. The short form (a pointer to a

Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

I'm curious to know if anyone else is using IE 11 and got the same virus alert as Dennis. I took a look at the file it was complaining about and it's just a pretty straightforward javascript file. I don't know why it would be marked as a virus. On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 2:25 PM, James Bognar wrot

Re: Traffic Control Incubation Proposal.

Sounds cool! Git-dual is not a broad option right now unfortunately so that will need to be updated to git-wp. Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 16, 2016, at 2:26 PM, Jan van Doorn wrote: > > Hi all, > > I would like to discuss the proposal of a new project to the Incubator. > > Traffic Control

Traffic Control Incubation Proposal.

Hi all, I would like to discuss the proposal of a new project to the Incubator. Traffic Control is a CDN control plane that was open sourced in April of 2015. The Proposal is pasted below and can be found on the wiki at: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TrafficControlProposal

Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

Done. Added direct links to the Documents section. On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Craig Russell wrote: > It would be good to update the proposal with relevant links. > > Craig > > > On Jun 16, 2016, at 2:02 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton > wrote: > > > > > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From

Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

It would be good to update the proposal with relevant links. Craig > On Jun 16, 2016, at 2:02 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton > wrote: > > > >> -Original Message- >> From: James Bognar [mailto:james.bog...@salesforce.com] >> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 12:51 >> To: general@incubator.apache.

RE: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

> -Original Message- > From: James Bognar [mailto:james.bog...@salesforce.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 12:51 > To: general@incubator.apache.org; dennis.hamil...@acm.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal > > The list of POJOs supported is listed here: > > http:/

Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

The list of POJOs supported is listed here: http://jamesbognar.github.io/juneau-docs/doc/overview-summary.html#Core.PojoCategories On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:26 AM, James Bognar wrote: > Hi Dennis, > > I don't have IE 11 readily available, so I can't verify the report of a > virus. It appears

Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

Hi Dennis, I don't have IE 11 readily available, so I can't verify the report of a virus. It appears to be complaining about a file in a copy of Apache Wink in the samples project. That's being used to demo using the Juneau serializers and parsers using handlers defined for JAX-RS. I'll have to

RE: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

It appears that POJO = Plain-Old Java Object. There does not seem to be consensus on what qualifies as a POJO. There is at least one definition that suggests absence of a need for a class path (?! whatever that means, perhaps being about dependencies?). Is there some technical, definitive def

Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

Sounds interesting. Sign me up to mentor. Craig > On Jun 16, 2016, at 9:52 AM, James Bognar wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'd like to propose Juneau to be an Apache Incubator project. > > Juneau is a toolkit for marshalling POJOs to a wide variety of content > types using a common framework, and for

Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

FYIhere's the content of the proposal. = Juneau Toolkit = == Abstract == Apache Juneau is a toolkit for marshalling POJOs to a wide variety of content types using a common framework, and for creating sophisticated self-documenting REST interfaces and microservices using VERY little code. ==

[DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

Hi all, I'd like to propose Juneau to be an Apache Incubator project. Juneau is a toolkit for marshalling POJOs to a wide variety of content types using a common framework, and for creating sophisticated self-documenting REST interfaces and microservices using VERY little code. Juneau has been i

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion 2.0.1 (incubating)

Thanks Justin for your, as usual, thorough review. You are correct, we only have a DISCLAIMER file for the source package. I have created JIRA TRAFODION-2068 to track the issue. As for the BSD license - the following text was added to the LICENSE file: . . . + BSD-4

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion 2.0.1 (incubating)

Justin, I don't see [1] (may be missing) Maybe we need clarification from legal? BSD 4 clause is just 3 clause w/ additional ask to not use UoC to endorse. It seems still in line w/ AL so I would assume no problems. John On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 12:48 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Not havi

Re: [DISCUSS] DistributedLog Incubation Proposal

Any feedback here, folks? If no, I'd like to start a voting thread soon. - Sijie On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 9:34 PM, Sijie Guo wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to propose DistributedLog to be an Apache Incubator project. > > DistributedLog is a high performance replicated log service. > It offers dura