Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC1)

2016-05-31 Thread Deron Eriksson
Thank you Justin and John for the clarification WRT the binaries in the source release. Deron On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 8:43 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > Thanks, > > Please consider this vote canceled and I will work on another RC with > proper fix for the binary files in the source distro. > >

Grant write access to the Incubator Wiki for GokulGunasekaran

2016-05-31 Thread Gokul Gunasekaran
Hi, Can you please grant write access to https://wiki.apache.org/incubator for id GokulGunasekaran? Thanks, Gokul

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Annotator

2016-05-31 Thread Sergio Fernández
Hi Benjamin, looks promising! Very interesting stuff. I'd be willing to mentor it, but I'm already in my limit with two podlings. For the proposal at https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AnnotatorProposal your should remove the hints from the template (e.g., "A short descriptive summary of the proj

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion 2.0.0 (incubating)

2016-05-31 Thread Sergio Fernández
+1 (binding) So far I've checked in the source release: signatures and digests, source releases file layouts, matched git tags and commit ids, incubator suffix and disclaimer, build sources in a clean environment (openjdk 1.8.0_91 on debian 64bits). On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Steve Varnau

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion 2.0.0 (incubating)

2016-05-31 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) It looks good to me. Regards JB On 05/31/2016 07:09 PM, Steve Varnau wrote: Hello, This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Trafodion 2.0.0-incubating (Release Candidate 3). The trafodion community has approved RC3 for release. Vote result: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_

Re: [VOTE] Accept CarbonData into the Apache Incubator

2016-05-31 Thread Sandeep Deshmukh
+1 (non-binding) Regards, Sandeep On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 7:04 PM, lidong wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > > Thanks, > Dong > --- > Apache Kylin - http://kylin.apache.org > Kyligence Inc. - http://kyligence.io > > > Original Message > Sender:Jean-Baptiste Onofréj...@nanthrax.net > Recipient:genera

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC1)

2016-05-31 Thread Luciano Resende
Thanks, Please consider this vote canceled and I will work on another RC with proper fix for the binary files in the source distro. On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 7:13 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:54 PM Justin Mclean > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > We will update trunk to remove

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion 2.0.0 (incubating)

2016-05-31 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 (binding) to release source package, but -1 for the client connivence binary until the 4 clause BSD licensing issue is resolved. For the source released I checked: - all files have incubating - signatures check out - disclaimer exists - LICENSE and NOTICE good - No unexpected binary in so

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC1)

2016-05-31 Thread John D. Ament
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:54 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > We will update trunk to remove the specified files. Will we need to begin > > voting again for another release candidate with these changes, or would > it > > suffice that the next release will have this fix? > > Depends on how othe

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC1)

2016-05-31 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > We will update trunk to remove the specified files. Will we need to begin > voting again for another release candidate with these changes, or would it > suffice that the next release will have this fix? Depends on how other IPMC members vote, if you get 3 +1 votes and more +1’s than -1’s t

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC1)

2016-05-31 Thread Deron Eriksson
Hi Justin, Thank you for reviewing the SystemML release candidate. I agree about the large number of artifacts at [1]. It would also help us in terms of project maintenance to decrease the number of artifacts that we are generating. We will update trunk to remove the specified files. Will we need

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC1)

2016-05-31 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Sorry -1 (binding) due to unexpected binaries in the source release. For the source artefact I checked: - signatures and hashes good - file name contain incubating - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE correct - There are unexpended binary in the source release (see below) - All files have

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC1)

2016-05-31 Thread Luciano Resende
Just want to reiterate my +1, And also mention that we got one of our mentors to vote on the dev list thread https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org/msg00617.html Anyone else willing to help us get this release out. Thanks On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Luciano Resende

Re: Could you please add my id (hzeller) as a contributor

2016-05-31 Thread Nick Burch
On Tue, 31 May 2016, Hans Zeller wrote: Could you please add my wiki id, hzeller to the Contributors group, so I can add the report? Karma granted, enjoy! Nick - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.or

Could you please add my id (hzeller) as a contributor

2016-05-31 Thread Hans Zeller
Hi, We are preparing the Trafodion report to the Incubator PMC and would like to add it to the wiki page https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/June2016. Could you please add my wiki id, hzeller to the Contributors group, so I can add the report? Thanks, Hans Zeller

Re: Request to add me to Incubator Wiki (KeithTurner)

2016-05-31 Thread John D. Ament
Done, happy editing! On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 5:52 PM Keith Turner wrote: > Wiki user name: KeithTurner >

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating) - rc3

2016-05-31 Thread Velmurugan Periasamy
Incubator PMC, The vote has passed with 3 “+1” votes from IPMC members (who provided their votes in Dev VOTE thread) and no “0” or “-1” votes. +1 (binding): - Alan Gates - Jakob Homan - Colm O hEigeartaigh +0: None -1: None I will proceed with official release. Thank you so much for your

Request to add me to Incubator Wiki (KeithTurner)

2016-05-31 Thread Keith Turner
Wiki user name: KeithTurner

RE: [PROPOSAL] Apache Annotator

2016-05-31 Thread Benjamin Young
Yeah. A bit of both, actually. ;) JSON-LD is the new bridge builder / peace-maker in this space. There's an RDF-based data model "underneath" but the expression of it can be treated as "plain JSON" for those who don't do RDF. For instance, I have the beginnings of the Web Annotation Protocol bu

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Annotator

2016-05-31 Thread Nick Kew
On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 18:13 +, Benjamin Young wrote: > Yeah. Lots has happened in the intervening 14 years. :) :) Thanks for the reply. I kind-of thought it might've done, but (having followed your first link and found only javascript that had nothing to say on the subject) I was looking fo

RE: [PROPOSAL] Apache Annotator

2016-05-31 Thread Benjamin Young
Yeah. Lots has happened in the intervening 14 years. :) The new thing is called the Web Annotation Data Model [1] and it's born out of work by the Web Annotation Working Group [2] which in turn built on the work created in the Open Annotation Community Group [3]. Annotea was used merely as a hi

Re: Podling name search - early or late?

2016-05-31 Thread Liang Chen
+1 for confirming the name early for podling project Liang -- View this message in context: http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/Podling-name-search-early-or-late-tp49856p49901.html Sent from the Apache Incubator - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --

Re: Request to add me to Incubator Wiki (HemanthYamijala)

2016-05-31 Thread John D. Ament
Added, happy editing! On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 1:13 PM Hemanth Yamijala wrote: > Wiki user name: HemanthYamijala >

Request to add me to Incubator Wiki (HemanthYamijala)

2016-05-31 Thread Hemanth Yamijala
Wiki user name: HemanthYamijala

[VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion 2.0.0 (incubating)

2016-05-31 Thread Steve Varnau
Hello, This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Trafodion 2.0.0-incubating (Release Candidate 3). The trafodion community has approved RC3 for release. Vote result: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-trafodion-dev/201605.mb ox/%3Cebe8936d36c9cedc2fbf65a94e6c5cbf%40mail.gmail.com

Re: Requesting edit privileges for the Incubator Wiki

2016-05-31 Thread Nick Burch
On Tue, 31 May 2016, Queenie Ma wrote: I would like to be granted edit privileges for the Incubator Wiki so that I can update the Incubator PMC report for June 2016 for the Quarks project. Name: Queenie Ma Karma granted, enjoy! Nick ---

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Annotator

2016-05-31 Thread Nick Kew
On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 13:46 +, Benjamin Young wrote: > Hi all, > > I have been working with the AnnotatorJS.org community to move our community > to the ASF. We have in the past been a BDFL-led group, but that has proved > unsustainable and resulted in many forks and lost opportunity. I see

Requesting edit privileges for the Incubator Wiki

2016-05-31 Thread Queenie Ma
Hello, I would like to be granted edit privileges for the Incubator Wiki so that I can update the Incubator PMC report for June 2016 for the Quarks project. Name: Queenie Ma Email: queeni...@apache.org Thank you, Queenie Ma

RE: [PROPOSAL] Apache Annotator

2016-05-31 Thread Benjamin Young
Thanks, John! Posted: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AnnotatorProposal -Original Message- From: John D. Ament [mailto:johndam...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 9:50 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org; Benjamin Young Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Annotator Hi Benjamin, I'

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Annotator

2016-05-31 Thread John D. Ament
Hi Benjamin, I've added bigbluehat to the contributors group, feel free to post your proposal there. John On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:46 AM Benjamin Young wrote: > Hi all, > > I have been working with the AnnotatorJS.org community to move our > community to the ASF. We have in the past been a BD

[PROPOSAL] Apache Annotator

2016-05-31 Thread Benjamin Young
Hi all, I have been working with the AnnotatorJS.org community to move our community to the ASF. We have in the past been a BDFL-led group, but that has proved unsustainable and resulted in many forks and lost opportunity. Recently, many community members gathered at the http://iannotate.org/